{"id":256,"date":"2018-03-08T08:00:54","date_gmt":"2018-03-08T13:00:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/productivitycast.net\/?p=256"},"modified":"2018-03-05T18:20:03","modified_gmt":"2018-03-05T23:20:03","slug":"025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/","title":{"rendered":"025 How Next-Action Thinking Changes Over Time &#8211; ProductivityCast"},"content":{"rendered":"<div itemscope itemtype=\"http:\/\/schema.org\/AudioObject\"><meta itemprop=\"name\" content=\"025 How Next-Action Thinking Changes Over Time &amp;#8211; ProductivityCast\" \/><meta itemprop=\"uploadDate\" content=\"2018-03-08T08:00:54-05:00\" \/><meta itemprop=\"encodingFormat\" content=\"audio\/mpeg\" \/><meta itemprop=\"duration\" content=\"PT49M05S\" \/><meta itemprop=\"description\" content=\"25 episodes! Thank you all for listening and helping us grow the ProductivityCast community!\n\nAs we grow and change in our personal and professional lives, we should all consider if the way you see your \u201cnext actions\u201d (the granular, physical tasks we...\" \/><meta itemprop=\"contentUrl\" content=\"https:\/\/media.blubrry.com\/productivitycast\/content.blubrry.com\/productivitycast\/025-how-next-action-thinking-changes-over-time-productivitycast.mp3\" \/><meta itemprop=\"contentSize\" content=\"45.7\" \/><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/player.blubrry.com\/?media_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.blubrry.com%2Fproductivitycast%2Fcontent.blubrry.com%2Fproductivitycast%2F025-how-next-action-thinking-changes-over-time-productivitycast.mp3&amp;podcast_link=https%3A%2F%2Fproductivitycast.net%2F025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast%2F\" scrolling=\"no\" width=\"100%\" height=\"165\" frameborder=\"0\" id=\"blubrryplayer-1\" class=\"blubrryplayer\" title=\"Blubrry Podcast Player\"><\/iframe><\/div><p class=\"powerpress_links powerpress_links_mp3\" style=\"margin-bottom: 1px !important;\">Podcast: <a href=\"https:\/\/media.blubrry.com\/productivitycast\/content.blubrry.com\/productivitycast\/025-how-next-action-thinking-changes-over-time-productivitycast.mp3\" class=\"powerpress_link_pinw\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Play in new window\" onclick=\"return powerpress_pinw('https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/?powerpress_pinw=256-podcast');\" rel=\"nofollow\">Play in new window<\/a> | <a href=\"https:\/\/media.blubrry.com\/productivitycast\/content.blubrry.com\/productivitycast\/025-how-next-action-thinking-changes-over-time-productivitycast.mp3\" class=\"powerpress_link_d\" title=\"Download\" rel=\"nofollow\" download=\"025-how-next-action-thinking-changes-over-time-productivitycast.mp3\">Download<\/a> | <a href=\"#\" class=\"powerpress_link_e\" title=\"Embed\" onclick=\"return powerpress_show_embed('256-podcast');\" rel=\"nofollow\">Embed<\/a><\/p><p class=\"powerpress_embed_box\" id=\"powerpress_embed_256-podcast\" style=\"display: none;\"><input id=\"powerpress_embed_256-podcast_t\" type=\"text\" value=\"&lt;iframe src=&quot;https:\/\/player.blubrry.com\/?media_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.blubrry.com%2Fproductivitycast%2Fcontent.blubrry.com%2Fproductivitycast%2F025-how-next-action-thinking-changes-over-time-productivitycast.mp3&amp;podcast_link=https%3A%2F%2Fproductivitycast.net%2F025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast%2F&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; width=&quot;100%&quot; height=&quot;165&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; id=&quot;blubrryplayer-2&quot; class=&quot;blubrryplayer&quot; title=&quot;Blubrry Podcast Player&quot;&gt;&lt;\/iframe&gt;\" onclick=\"javascript: this.select();\" onfocus=\"javascript: this.select();\" style=\"width: 70%;\" readOnly><\/p><p class=\"powerpress_links powerpress_subscribe_links\">Subscribe: <a href=\"https:\/\/itunes.apple.com\/us\/podcast\/productivitycast\/id1088480807?mt=2&amp;ls=1#episodeGuid=http%3A%2F%2Fproductivitycast.net%2F%3Fp%3D256\" class=\"powerpress_link_subscribe powerpress_link_subscribe_itunes\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Subscribe on Apple Podcasts\" rel=\"nofollow\">Apple Podcasts<\/a> | <a href=\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/feed\/podcast\/\" class=\"powerpress_link_subscribe powerpress_link_subscribe_rss\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Subscribe via RSS\" rel=\"nofollow\">RSS<\/a> | <a href=\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/subscribe\/\" class=\"powerpress_link_subscribe powerpress_link_subscribe_more\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"More\" rel=\"nofollow\">More<\/a><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">25 episodes! Thank you all for listening and helping us grow the ProductivityCast community!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As we grow and change in our personal and professional lives, we should all consider if the way you see your \u201cnext actions\u201d (the granular, physical tasks we take to move projects forward, <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">a la<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Getting Things Done by David Allen). If we approach next-action crafting in time chunks smaller or larger, or based on different contexts, than you need to accomplish them, then we\u2019ll see ourselves being less effective. In this cast, the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ProductivityCast<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> team addresses the issue of priming ourselves to appropriate next-action thinking in our productivity systems.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Enjoy! <a href=\"http:\/\/productivitycast.net\/contact\/\">Give us feedback<\/a>! And, again, thanks for listening!<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;d like to discuss this episode, please <a href=\"#reply-title\">click here to leave a comment<\/a> down below (this jumps you to the bottom of the post).<\/p>\n<h2>In this Cast<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/productivitycast.net\/about\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Ray Sidney-Smith<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/productivitycast.net\/about\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Augusto Pinaud<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/productivitycast.net\/about\/\">Francis Wade<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/productivitycast.net\/about\/\">Art Gelwicks<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Show Notes<\/h2>\n<p><em>Resources we mention, including links to them will be provided here. Please listen to the episode for context.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/amzn.to\/2DZKux3\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Getting Things Done: The Art of Stress-Free Productivity<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> by David Allen<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/quantifiedself.com\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Quantified Self<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.meetup.com\/DC-Quantified-Self\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DC Quantified Self<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> &#8211; Ray is the Organizer)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www2.usgs.gov\/humancapital\/documents\/TimeManagementGrid.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Eisenhower Matrix (Merrill-Covey Matrix)<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.stress.org\/holmes-rahe-stress-inventory\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Holmes-Rahe Life Stress Inventory<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Life changes to give you pause to know it\u2019s time to reflect on the structure, time and contexts of your next-action planning:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1- Birth<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">2- Death<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Professional Transitions<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a03- I&#8217;ve Been Demoted!<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a04- I&#8217;ve Been Promoted!<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a05- I&#8217;ve Been Hired!<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a06- Unemployment (whether involuntary or by choice)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a07- Changing Careers (while employed or not)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">8- Starting School<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">9- First Job<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">10- Moving Home<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">11- Moving Office<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">12- Downsizing Home<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">13- Starting Retirement<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">15- Marriage \/ Long-Term Commitment<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">15- Divorce \/ Separation \/ Ending a Long-Term Relationship<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.2time-sys.com\/calculator-do-you-need-a-task-management-improvement\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Calculator &#8211; Do You Need a Task Management Improvement?<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> by Francis Wade<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Francis: \u201c<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/medium.com\/2time-labs\/the-evergreen-guide-to-choosing-your-next-task-management-app-5e4ad21212af\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Ultimate, Evergreen Guide to Choosing Your Next Task Management App or Practice<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u201d Plus. the stuff on implicit vs explicit tagging is in my book which is being updated &#8211; <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/perfect.mytimedesign.com\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">http:\/\/perfect.mytimedesign.com<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Francis also included the idea in this paper &#8211; <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.2time-sys.com\/can-time-actually-be-managed\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">http:\/\/www.2time-sys.com\/can-time-actually-be-managed\/<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Francis: The idea of facing changing constraints as task load increases, and the need to see a change is also mentioned in this article: <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.quora.com\/What-are-the-greatest-task-management-tools-and-why\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">What are the greatest task management tools, and why?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Raw Text Transcript<\/h2>\n<p><em>Raw, unedited and machine-produced text transcript so there may be substantial errors, but you can search for specific points in the episode to jump to, or to reference back to at a later date and time, by keywords or key phrases. The time coding is h:mm:ss.ms to\u00a0h:mm:ss.ms (e.g., 0:00:00.000,0:00:04.000 starts at 0.00 seconds and ends at 4 seconds in the cast&#8217;s audio).<\/em><\/p>\n<span><a onclick=\"read_toggle(1678551774, 'Read More', 'Read Less'); return false;\" class=\"read-link\" id=\"readlink1678551774\" style=\"readlink\" href=\"#\">Read More<\/a><\/span>\n<div class=\"read_div\" id=\"read1678551774\" style=\"display: none;\"><\/p>\n<p>1<br \/>\n00:00:00,030 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:03,870<br \/>\nare you ready to manage your work and<\/p>\n<p>2<br \/>\n00:00:02,159 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:06,120<br \/>\npersonal world better to live a<\/p>\n<p>3<br \/>\n00:00:03,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:07,350<br \/>\nfulfilling productive life then you&#8217;ve<\/p>\n<p>4<br \/>\n00:00:06,120 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:09,780<br \/>\ncome to the right place<\/p>\n<p>5<br \/>\n00:00:07,350 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:12,360<br \/>\nproductivity cast the weekly show about<\/p>\n<p>6<br \/>\n00:00:09,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:15,480<br \/>\nall things productivity here your hosts<\/p>\n<p>7<br \/>\n00:00:12,360 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:17,430<br \/>\nray Sydney Smith and Augusto pronounces<\/p>\n<p>8<br \/>\n00:00:15,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:21,240<br \/>\nweight and art Galax welcome back<\/p>\n<p>9<br \/>\n00:00:17,430 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:23,609<br \/>\neverybody to episode 25 of productivity<\/p>\n<p>10<br \/>\n00:00:21,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:26,460<br \/>\ncast and so I just want to thank you all<\/p>\n<p>11<br \/>\n00:00:23,609 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:28,740<br \/>\nfor listening to productivity cast and I<\/p>\n<p>12<br \/>\n00:00:26,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:31,650<br \/>\nwant to welcome to the show today<\/p>\n<p>13<br \/>\n00:00:28,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:35,100<br \/>\ngusto pinaud francis Wade and art Galax<\/p>\n<p>14<br \/>\n00:00:31,650 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:37,380<br \/>\nwelcome to the show gentlemen guys I&#8217;m<\/p>\n<p>15<br \/>\n00:00:35,100 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:40,680<br \/>\ndoing really well and as I was saying<\/p>\n<p>16<br \/>\n00:00:37,380 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:42,239<br \/>\npre-show I&#8217;m I&#8217;m double caffeinated I&#8217;m<\/p>\n<p>17<br \/>\n00:00:40,680 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:45,379<br \/>\ndrinking two types of caffeine this<\/p>\n<p>18<br \/>\n00:00:42,239 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:47,610<br \/>\nmorning so I&#8217;m probably a little jittery<\/p>\n<p>19<br \/>\n00:00:45,379 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:49,710<br \/>\nbut I&#8217;m gonna I&#8217;m gonna try and keep it<\/p>\n<p>20<br \/>\n00:00:47,610 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:51,510<br \/>\nlevel keep it level for us all today so<\/p>\n<p>21<br \/>\n00:00:49,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:54,719<br \/>\nwe&#8217;re gonna we&#8217;re gonna talk today about<\/p>\n<p>22<br \/>\n00:00:51,510 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:58,680<br \/>\na rather interesting concept principle<\/p>\n<p>23<br \/>\n00:00:54,719 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:00,570<br \/>\nconcept centering on the premise of<\/p>\n<p>24<br \/>\n00:00:58,680 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:02,340<br \/>\ngetting things done next action<\/p>\n<p>25<br \/>\n00:01:00,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:04,979<br \/>\nprinciples and how those things change<\/p>\n<p>26<br \/>\n00:01:02,340 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:06,840<br \/>\nover time and so I&#8217;m gonna hand the mic<\/p>\n<p>27<br \/>\n00:01:04,979 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:08,400<br \/>\nover to you a goose toe to explain to<\/p>\n<p>28<br \/>\n00:01:06,840 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:11,130<br \/>\nthe audience what we&#8217;re gonna be talking<\/p>\n<p>29<br \/>\n00:01:08,400 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:14,070<br \/>\nabout today I was looking at my next<\/p>\n<p>30<br \/>\n00:01:11,130 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:16,140<br \/>\naction list as it was getting behind and<\/p>\n<p>31<br \/>\n00:01:14,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:19,170<br \/>\nI couldn&#8217;t understand why it&#8217;s not a<\/p>\n<p>32<br \/>\n00:01:16,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:23,369<br \/>\nmatter of the job it&#8217;s not a matter of<\/p>\n<p>33<br \/>\n00:01:19,170 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:25,470<br \/>\nthe tasks per se but the fact was what&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>34<br \/>\n00:01:23,369 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:27,630<br \/>\ngetting behind and I started to get<\/p>\n<p>35<br \/>\n00:01:25,470 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:31,110<br \/>\naccumulated so the question for me was<\/p>\n<p>36<br \/>\n00:01:27,630 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:33,329<br \/>\nis this something because I&#8217;ve been<\/p>\n<p>37<br \/>\n00:01:31,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:36,630<br \/>\nextremely busy or this is something<\/p>\n<p>38<br \/>\n00:01:33,329 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:41,610<br \/>\nbecause a condition around my day-to-day<\/p>\n<p>39<br \/>\n00:01:36,630 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:43,290<br \/>\nchange in my particular case was the<\/p>\n<p>40<br \/>\n00:01:41,610 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:46,860<br \/>\nsecond one a condition around my<\/p>\n<p>41<br \/>\n00:01:43,290 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:51,299<br \/>\nworkplace my work day-to-day change so<\/p>\n<p>42<br \/>\n00:01:46,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:55,439<br \/>\nwhat happened was I begin changing or<\/p>\n<p>43<br \/>\n00:01:51,299 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:58,229<br \/>\nevolving my role from a person who spent<\/p>\n<p>44<br \/>\n00:01:55,439 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:01,140<br \/>\na lot of time in the office to a person<\/p>\n<p>45<br \/>\n00:01:58,229 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:04,350<br \/>\nwho spent almost none in the office in<\/p>\n<p>46<br \/>\n00:02:01,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:08,190<br \/>\nother words a world warrior again<\/p>\n<p>47<br \/>\n00:02:04,350 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:13,480<br \/>\nas I was looking at that I begin to<\/p>\n<p>48<br \/>\n00:02:08,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:17,709<br \/>\nconsider or ask myself if the way you<\/p>\n<p>49<br \/>\n00:02:13,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:21,549<br \/>\nsee your next actions and how is<\/p>\n<p>50<br \/>\n00:02:17,709 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:24,310<br \/>\naffected by the unconscious time you<\/p>\n<p>51<br \/>\n00:02:21,549 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:27,040<br \/>\nthink you have to accomplish them so if<\/p>\n<p>52<br \/>\n00:02:24,310 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:29,680<br \/>\nyou think for example on the two-minute<\/p>\n<p>53<br \/>\n00:02:27,040 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:31,090<br \/>\nrule the two minutes without any doubts<\/p>\n<p>54<br \/>\n00:02:29,680 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:36,099<br \/>\nin arbitrary number<\/p>\n<p>55<br \/>\n00:02:31,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:40,120<br \/>\nso we with practice we begin to identify<\/p>\n<p>56<br \/>\n00:02:36,099 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:42,040<br \/>\nwhat kind of task can be done on that 2<\/p>\n<p>57<br \/>\n00:02:40,120 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:44,560<br \/>\nminutes roll the same way that when we<\/p>\n<p>58<br \/>\n00:02:42,040 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:46,660<br \/>\nare when we have less time we change<\/p>\n<p>59<br \/>\n00:02:44,560 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:48,310<br \/>\nthat 2 minutes to maybe a minute or 30<\/p>\n<p>60<br \/>\n00:02:46,660 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:50,560<br \/>\nseconds and everything else going to the<\/p>\n<p>61<br \/>\n00:02:48,310 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:52,510<br \/>\nsystem or when we have a ridiculous<\/p>\n<p>62<br \/>\n00:02:50,560 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:55,709<br \/>\namount of time for example a long train<\/p>\n<p>63<br \/>\n00:02:52,510 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:58,150<br \/>\ntrip coast-to-coast then we can go to a<\/p>\n<p>64<br \/>\n00:02:55,709 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:00,760<br \/>\n15-minute time because we&#8217;ll make no<\/p>\n<p>65<br \/>\n00:02:58,150 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:06,790<br \/>\ndifference we are not going anywhere so<\/p>\n<p>66<br \/>\n00:03:00,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:10,349<br \/>\nI begin to wonder if hold your next<\/p>\n<p>67<br \/>\n00:03:06,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:13,780<br \/>\nactions do conscious or unconscious<\/p>\n<p>68<br \/>\n00:03:10,349 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:15,700<br \/>\nbegin setting that same time so when I&#8217;m<\/p>\n<p>69<br \/>\n00:03:13,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:19,480<br \/>\nsitting at work this is around the time<\/p>\n<p>70<br \/>\n00:03:15,700 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:22,090<br \/>\nI can do without being interrupted or<\/p>\n<p>71<br \/>\n00:03:19,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:24,220<br \/>\nwithout the next meeting coming or<\/p>\n<p>72<br \/>\n00:03:22,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:26,919<br \/>\nwithout somebody coming to my desk and<\/p>\n<p>73<br \/>\n00:03:24,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:29,950<br \/>\nask me what I&#8217;m doing and you begin<\/p>\n<p>74<br \/>\n00:03:26,919 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:34,930<br \/>\ndefining your next actions based on that<\/p>\n<p>75<br \/>\n00:03:29,950 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:37,060<br \/>\ninterval if that&#8217;s true then you should<\/p>\n<p>76<br \/>\n00:03:34,930 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:42,359<br \/>\nbe able to adjust it one way or the<\/p>\n<p>77<br \/>\n00:03:37,060 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:45,430<br \/>\nother but I&#8217;m curious if people also<\/p>\n<p>78<br \/>\n00:03:42,359 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:50,280<br \/>\nobserve the same thing in other words if<\/p>\n<p>79<br \/>\n00:03:45,430 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:54,910<br \/>\nthey also notice that their next actions<\/p>\n<p>80<br \/>\n00:03:50,280 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:57,340<br \/>\nare defined to a specific interval of<\/p>\n<p>81<br \/>\n00:03:54,910 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:59,980<br \/>\ntime or is just the way mine works<\/p>\n<p>82<br \/>\n00:03:57,340 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:02,410<br \/>\nenough yeah I&#8217;m thinking about this from<\/p>\n<p>83<br \/>\n00:03:59,980 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:04,120<br \/>\nthe perspective of one of the questions<\/p>\n<p>84<br \/>\n00:04:02,410 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:06,370<br \/>\nthat I always ask myself and I ask other<\/p>\n<p>85<br \/>\n00:04:04,120 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:09,910<br \/>\npeople when they&#8217;re trying to do task<\/p>\n<p>86<br \/>\n00:04:06,370 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:12,910<br \/>\nestimation is what&#8217;s the amount of time<\/p>\n<p>87<br \/>\n00:04:09,910 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:15,600<br \/>\nthat you think a task is going to take<\/p>\n<p>88<br \/>\n00:04:12,910 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:18,180<br \/>\nbased on either assessment or<\/p>\n<p>89<br \/>\n00:04:15,600 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:19,830<br \/>\nhistorical values what&#8217;s important I<\/p>\n<p>90<br \/>\n00:04:18,180 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:22,230<br \/>\nthink related to what you&#8217;re bringing up<\/p>\n<p>91<br \/>\n00:04:19,830 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:25,440<br \/>\nAugusto is that I don&#8217;t know that it&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>92<br \/>\n00:04:22,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:28,260<br \/>\nnecessarily contextual to the time you<\/p>\n<p>93<br \/>\n00:04:25,440 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:30,020<br \/>\nhave available because if you think<\/p>\n<p>94<br \/>\n00:04:28,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:32,640<br \/>\nabout traditional project management<\/p>\n<p>95<br \/>\n00:04:30,020 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:33,270<br \/>\nmethodology you&#8217;ve got time cost and<\/p>\n<p>96<br \/>\n00:04:32,640 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:36,390<br \/>\nscope<\/p>\n<p>97<br \/>\n00:04:33,270 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:38,430<br \/>\nwell if time becomes an inflexible value<\/p>\n<p>98<br \/>\n00:04:36,390 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:40,200<br \/>\nwhich is this is the amount of time I<\/p>\n<p>99<br \/>\n00:04:38,430 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:42,180<br \/>\nhave in my calendar the only other two<\/p>\n<p>100<br \/>\n00:04:40,200 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:43,920<br \/>\nthings that can adjust related to it or<\/p>\n<p>101<br \/>\n00:04:42,180 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:46,230<br \/>\ncost and scope and if we&#8217;re not talking<\/p>\n<p>102<br \/>\n00:04:43,920 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:48,930<br \/>\nabout money it&#8217;s the amount of actual<\/p>\n<p>103<br \/>\n00:04:46,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:51,780<br \/>\nwork that you can do but we haven&#8217;t said<\/p>\n<p>104<br \/>\n00:04:48,930 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:54,030<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s the case that we can change the<\/p>\n<p>105<br \/>\n00:04:51,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:56,700<br \/>\nwork on the task so we have two<\/p>\n<p>106<br \/>\n00:04:54,030 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:59,760<br \/>\ninflexible values trying to help us do<\/p>\n<p>107<br \/>\n00:04:56,700 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:03,390<br \/>\nthis assessment I think if you&#8217;re in a<\/p>\n<p>108<br \/>\n00:04:59,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:05,280<br \/>\nsituation where you have time blocks and<\/p>\n<p>109<br \/>\n00:05:03,390 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:07,770<br \/>\nyou&#8217;re trying to find work that fits<\/p>\n<p>110<br \/>\n00:05:05,280 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:11,040<br \/>\ninto those blocks that&#8217;s a determination<\/p>\n<p>111<br \/>\n00:05:07,770 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:12,830<br \/>\nyou almost have to make prior to getting<\/p>\n<p>112<br \/>\n00:05:11,040 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:15,540<br \/>\nto those time blocks you have to look at<\/p>\n<p>113<br \/>\n00:05:12,830 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:17,280<br \/>\nthe timeline itself you have to look at<\/p>\n<p>114<br \/>\n00:05:15,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:19,350<br \/>\nthe tasks and say okay this task has<\/p>\n<p>115<br \/>\n00:05:17,280 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:20,790<br \/>\ntraditionally taken twenty minutes and I<\/p>\n<p>116<br \/>\n00:05:19,350 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:23,850<br \/>\nwas reading an article last week<\/p>\n<p>117<br \/>\n00:05:20,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:26,790<br \/>\nironically enough that talks about this<\/p>\n<p>118<br \/>\n00:05:23,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:28,620<br \/>\nidea of tagging related to time and<\/p>\n<p>119<br \/>\n00:05:26,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:31,200<br \/>\ngoing through and for example in this<\/p>\n<p>120<br \/>\n00:05:28,620 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:33,270<br \/>\ncase it was using OneNote creating a<\/p>\n<p>121<br \/>\n00:05:31,200 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:36,150<br \/>\nseries of tags or I&#8217;m sorry it was using<\/p>\n<p>122<br \/>\n00:05:33,270 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:37,950<br \/>\ntodoist creating a series of tags so<\/p>\n<p>123<br \/>\n00:05:36,150 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:39,840<br \/>\nthat when you put a task in you would<\/p>\n<p>124<br \/>\n00:05:37,950 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:42,480<br \/>\ntag it and say this is a 15-minute task<\/p>\n<p>125<br \/>\n00:05:39,840 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:44,460<br \/>\nor this is a 30-minute task then when<\/p>\n<p>126<br \/>\n00:05:42,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:46,140<br \/>\nyou had those opportunities of planning<\/p>\n<p>127<br \/>\n00:05:44,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:47,910<br \/>\nyour calendar you could go back and say<\/p>\n<p>128<br \/>\n00:05:46,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:50,790<br \/>\nokay I&#8217;ve got three 30-minute blocks<\/p>\n<p>129<br \/>\n00:05:47,910 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:52,790<br \/>\nhere where are all my 30-minute tasks<\/p>\n<p>130<br \/>\n00:05:50,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:55,530<br \/>\nand what can I put in where<\/p>\n<p>131<br \/>\n00:05:52,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:57,230<br \/>\ntheoretically that looks solid I have to<\/p>\n<p>132<br \/>\n00:05:55,530 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:59,940<br \/>\nadmit I haven&#8217;t tried it that much<\/p>\n<p>133<br \/>\n00:05:57,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:05,010<br \/>\nhands-on in that method to see if it<\/p>\n<p>134<br \/>\n00:05:59,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:06,900<br \/>\nworks well but yeah it has some pluses<\/p>\n<p>135<br \/>\n00:06:05,010 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:09,470<br \/>\nand minuses to it but I think it&#8217;s one<\/p>\n<p>136<br \/>\n00:06:06,900 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:12,690<br \/>\nof the ways to kind of mitigate this<\/p>\n<p>137<br \/>\n00:06:09,470 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:14,160<br \/>\npush-pull between time and scope when<\/p>\n<p>138<br \/>\n00:06:12,690 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:15,810<br \/>\nyou&#8217;re trying to get things planned out<\/p>\n<p>139<br \/>\n00:06:14,160 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:20,450<br \/>\nI&#8217;m not sure if that&#8217;s on target for<\/p>\n<p>140<br \/>\n00:06:15,810 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:24,600<br \/>\nwhat you&#8217;re looking for though I have a<\/p>\n<p>141<br \/>\n00:06:20,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:28,070<br \/>\nsort of a little bit about girl net me<\/p>\n<p>142<br \/>\n00:06:24,600 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:28,070<br \/>\nadd something to the discussion I think<\/p>\n<p>143<br \/>\n00:06:28,300 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:33,650<br \/>\nit&#8217;s a psychological phenomena from from<\/p>\n<p>144<br \/>\n00:06:31,909 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:35,210<br \/>\nmy point of view that when you create a<\/p>\n<p>145<br \/>\n00:06:33,650 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:39,460<br \/>\ntask the minute your mind comes up with<\/p>\n<p>146<br \/>\n00:06:35,210 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:42,199<br \/>\nthe task it automatically tags it in<\/p>\n<p>147<br \/>\n00:06:39,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:46,639<br \/>\nwhat what I what I call in my book in<\/p>\n<p>148<br \/>\n00:06:42,199 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:49,729<br \/>\nwith implicit tags and the these have to<\/p>\n<p>149<br \/>\n00:06:46,639 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:52,219<br \/>\ndo with for example what&#8217;s the context<\/p>\n<p>150<br \/>\n00:06:49,729 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:56,029<br \/>\nwhat&#8217;s the duration when am I going to<\/p>\n<p>151<br \/>\n00:06:52,219 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:58,310<br \/>\ndo it how important is it is it urgent<\/p>\n<p>152<br \/>\n00:06:56,029 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:00,740<br \/>\ndoes it involve any equipment does it<\/p>\n<p>153<br \/>\n00:06:58,310 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:03,409<br \/>\nhave a cost in other words well as soon<\/p>\n<p>154<br \/>\n00:07:00,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:06,740<br \/>\nas we create a task in our mind these<\/p>\n<p>155<br \/>\n00:07:03,409 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:12,349<br \/>\npsychological tags get created along<\/p>\n<p>156<br \/>\n00:07:06,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:15,139<br \/>\nalong with it the the when we start to<\/p>\n<p>157<br \/>\n00:07:12,349 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:19,400<br \/>\nbring tasks out of our head and put them<\/p>\n<p>158<br \/>\n00:07:15,139 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:21,919<br \/>\nonto lists we start to make these some<\/p>\n<p>159<br \/>\n00:07:19,400 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:23,900<br \/>\nof these tags explicit so they go from<\/p>\n<p>160<br \/>\n00:07:21,919 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:25,339<br \/>\nbeing just sort of vague notions to<\/p>\n<p>161<br \/>\n00:07:23,900 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:28,879<br \/>\nbeing something that we can manipulate<\/p>\n<p>162<br \/>\n00:07:25,339 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:32,839<br \/>\nbecause there&#8217;s actual data involved so<\/p>\n<p>163<br \/>\n00:07:28,879 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:35,509<br \/>\nfor example when you create a to-do list<\/p>\n<p>164<br \/>\n00:07:32,839 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:38,419<br \/>\nand you use the Eisenhower metrics<\/p>\n<p>165<br \/>\n00:07:35,509 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:42,139<br \/>\nyou&#8217;re bringing the important and urgent<\/p>\n<p>166<br \/>\n00:07:38,419 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:45,979<br \/>\ntags out of your sort of the recesses of<\/p>\n<p>167<br \/>\n00:07:42,139 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:47,659<br \/>\nyour mind the implicit tags and you&#8217;re<\/p>\n<p>168<br \/>\n00:07:45,979 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:50,870<br \/>\nmaking them explicit because you know<\/p>\n<p>169<br \/>\n00:07:47,659 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:54,770<br \/>\nyou&#8217;re organizing the the tasks in front<\/p>\n<p>170<br \/>\n00:07:50,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:57,770<br \/>\nof you using these no explicit tasks<\/p>\n<p>171<br \/>\n00:07:54,770 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:59,839<br \/>\nit&#8217;s re tags and I think what happens<\/p>\n<p>172<br \/>\n00:07:57,770 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:02,509<br \/>\nover time which I think sort of<\/p>\n<p>173<br \/>\n00:07:59,839 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:04,879<br \/>\naddresses a Gusteau&#8217;s concerned that<\/p>\n<p>174<br \/>\n00:08:02,509 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:06,860<br \/>\nhe&#8217;s noticed a shift I think what<\/p>\n<p>175<br \/>\n00:08:04,879 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:11,360<br \/>\nhappens over time is that as the number<\/p>\n<p>176<br \/>\n00:08:06,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:14,599<br \/>\nof tasks increase we need to change our<\/p>\n<p>177<br \/>\n00:08:11,360 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:17,210<br \/>\ntactics accordingly so in the very<\/p>\n<p>178<br \/>\n00:08:14,599 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:19,699<br \/>\nbeginning the first time we start to<\/p>\n<p>179<br \/>\n00:08:17,210 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:21,529<br \/>\nmake lists people out people rave about<\/p>\n<p>180<br \/>\n00:08:19,699 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:25,849<br \/>\nno ties and all this because it&#8217;s a very<\/p>\n<p>181<br \/>\n00:08:21,529 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:28,189<br \/>\nbasic way of using explicit tags but<\/p>\n<p>182<br \/>\n00:08:25,849 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:30,139<br \/>\nthat works for as long as it works which<\/p>\n<p>183<br \/>\n00:08:28,189 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:33,589<br \/>\nis for most people open to the point<\/p>\n<p>184<br \/>\n00:08:30,139 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:35,209<br \/>\nwhere there&#8217;s too many tasks then they<\/p>\n<p>185<br \/>\n00:08:33,589 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:39,199<br \/>\nmove then you need to migrate to a<\/p>\n<p>186<br \/>\n00:08:35,209 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:40,910<br \/>\ndifferent kind of a system and many<\/p>\n<p>187<br \/>\n00:08:39,199 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:42,970<br \/>\npeople move to for example<\/p>\n<p>188<br \/>\n00:08:40,910 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:45,890<br \/>\nGTD system which is a system of using<\/p>\n<p>189<br \/>\n00:08:42,970 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:51,430<br \/>\ncontexts in different ways and that the<\/p>\n<p>190<br \/>\n00:08:45,890 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:53,920<br \/>\nGTD contexts are a bit can sa kind of<\/p>\n<p>191<br \/>\n00:08:51,430 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:58,390<br \/>\ninducing critique away because some are<\/p>\n<p>192<br \/>\n00:08:53,920 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:02,120<br \/>\nlocation-based some are equipment based<\/p>\n<p>193<br \/>\n00:08:58,390 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:05,870<br \/>\nthere there&#8217;s some people even use later<\/p>\n<p>194<br \/>\n00:09:02,120 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:09,020<br \/>\nsome days or temporally based so that we<\/p>\n<p>195<br \/>\n00:09:05,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:11,720<br \/>\ntry to gain some capacity by changing<\/p>\n<p>196<br \/>\n00:09:09,020 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:15,220<br \/>\nthe way we tag and I think what&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>197<br \/>\n00:09:11,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:18,620<br \/>\nhappened with Augusto my hype my<\/p>\n<p>198<br \/>\n00:09:15,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:21,410<br \/>\ndiagnosis if I were a doctor if to say<\/p>\n<p>199<br \/>\n00:09:18,620 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:25,070<br \/>\nthat he&#8217;s running out of available free<\/p>\n<p>200<br \/>\n00:09:21,410 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:27,800<br \/>\ntime and all of a sudden he doesn&#8217;t have<\/p>\n<p>201<br \/>\n00:09:25,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:33,710<br \/>\nthe flexibility that he had or in other<\/p>\n<p>202<br \/>\n00:09:27,800 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:38,390<br \/>\nwords he has less slack time to decide<\/p>\n<p>203<br \/>\n00:09:33,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:40,850<br \/>\nwhat to do when to put tasks put tasks<\/p>\n<p>204<br \/>\n00:09:38,390 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:45,500<br \/>\nwithin the slack time that he had he has<\/p>\n<p>205<br \/>\n00:09:40,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:49,310<br \/>\nso the motor time has gone down but he<\/p>\n<p>206<br \/>\n00:09:45,500 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:51,200<br \/>\nhe still expects his his task to fit<\/p>\n<p>207<br \/>\n00:09:49,310 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:54,050<br \/>\ninto the available slack time the way it<\/p>\n<p>208<br \/>\n00:09:51,200 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:55,850<br \/>\nused to which is the system that he used<\/p>\n<p>209<br \/>\n00:09:54,050 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:59,540<br \/>\nto use before he went out on the road<\/p>\n<p>210<br \/>\n00:09:55,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:01,730<br \/>\nand I think what&#8217;s happened what needs<\/p>\n<p>211<br \/>\n00:09:59,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:06,230<br \/>\nto happen sort of from the outside<\/p>\n<p>212<br \/>\n00:10:01,730 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:10,420<br \/>\nlooking in is he no needs to to move to<\/p>\n<p>213<br \/>\n00:10:06,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:15,110<br \/>\nusing temporal tags which are duration<\/p>\n<p>214<br \/>\n00:10:10,420 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:17,060<br \/>\nplanned time of start due date and all<\/p>\n<p>215<br \/>\n00:10:15,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:21,260<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s happened all that happens to all<\/p>\n<p>216<br \/>\n00:10:17,060 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:24,680<br \/>\nof us is that as we add more tasks a new<\/p>\n<p>217<br \/>\n00:10:21,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:27,080<br \/>\nconstraint emerges so in the in the very<\/p>\n<p>218<br \/>\n00:10:24,680 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:28,970<br \/>\nbeginning when you using memory the<\/p>\n<p>219<br \/>\n00:10:27,080 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:31,460<br \/>\nconstraint at that time at some point<\/p>\n<p>220<br \/>\n00:10:28,970 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:33,080<br \/>\nwhen we&#8217;re me maybe hit 15 16 17 years<\/p>\n<p>221<br \/>\n00:10:31,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:34,280<br \/>\nold is that we can&#8217;t remember all that<\/p>\n<p>222<br \/>\n00:10:33,080 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:37,670<br \/>\nwe need to so that we start writing<\/p>\n<p>223<br \/>\n00:10:34,280 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:40,640<br \/>\nstuff down so at that point the<\/p>\n<p>224<br \/>\n00:10:37,670 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:43,190<br \/>\nconstraint is memory and as we go along<\/p>\n<p>225<br \/>\n00:10:40,640 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:46,880<br \/>\nthe constraints change and we need to<\/p>\n<p>226<br \/>\n00:10:43,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:49,340<br \/>\nchange over our tactics accordingly and<\/p>\n<p>227<br \/>\n00:10:46,880 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:51,230<br \/>\nI think he&#8217;s he may be at the cusp<\/p>\n<p>228<br \/>\n00:10:49,340 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:52,310<br \/>\nwhich many people reach from my point of<\/p>\n<p>229<br \/>\n00:10:51,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:53,880<br \/>\nview and I&#8217;ve been there actually<\/p>\n<p>230<br \/>\n00:10:52,310 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:00,960<br \/>\nactually twice<\/p>\n<p>231<br \/>\n00:10:53,880 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:04,740<br \/>\nmy memory where the using task lists no<\/p>\n<p>232<br \/>\n00:11:00,960 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:06,810<br \/>\nlonger work so we used and I had to make<\/p>\n<p>233<br \/>\n00:11:04,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:08,760<br \/>\na transition to scheduling everything or<\/p>\n<p>234<br \/>\n00:11:06,810 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:12,930<br \/>\nin other words time blocking everything<\/p>\n<p>235<br \/>\n00:11:08,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:16,820<br \/>\nor using temporal tags instead of<\/p>\n<p>236<br \/>\n00:11:12,930 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:19,350<br \/>\ncontextual tags and the only reason I<\/p>\n<p>237<br \/>\n00:11:16,820 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:22,790<br \/>\nhave survived the transition is because<\/p>\n<p>238<br \/>\n00:11:19,350 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:26,460<br \/>\nI use a program that allows me to it to<\/p>\n<p>239<br \/>\n00:11:22,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:28,370<br \/>\nreschedule my calendar without my doing<\/p>\n<p>240<br \/>\n00:11:26,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:32,070<br \/>\nit converted auto schedules my calendar<\/p>\n<p>241<br \/>\n00:11:28,370 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:35,100<br \/>\nso it&#8217;s perfect for someone who must use<\/p>\n<p>242<br \/>\n00:11:32,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:39,590<br \/>\ncontext I&#8217;m sorry temporal tags versus<\/p>\n<p>243<br \/>\n00:11:35,100 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:44,100<br \/>\nother kinds of tags so I said a lot but<\/p>\n<p>244<br \/>\n00:11:39,590 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:45,720<br \/>\nwe&#8217;re reading it okay I&#8217;m gonna agree<\/p>\n<p>245<br \/>\n00:11:44,100 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:48,090<br \/>\nwith you completely on the idea of the<\/p>\n<p>246<br \/>\n00:11:45,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:51,480<br \/>\ntemporal tags and and kind of bring it<\/p>\n<p>247<br \/>\n00:11:48,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:55,560<br \/>\ndown a notch because you I think you hit<\/p>\n<p>248<br \/>\n00:11:51,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:59,100<br \/>\nthe key term on it and that is the the<\/p>\n<p>249<br \/>\n00:11:55,560 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:02,580<br \/>\ncontingencies that are impacting the<\/p>\n<p>250<br \/>\n00:11:59,100 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:05,340<br \/>\ntasks have shifted what are the primary<\/p>\n<p>251<br \/>\n00:12:02,580 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:07,470<br \/>\ndrivers that are that have influence and<\/p>\n<p>252<br \/>\n00:12:05,340 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:10,290<br \/>\ncontrol over those tasks if you&#8217;re in a<\/p>\n<p>253<br \/>\n00:12:07,470 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:12,750<br \/>\nsituation where you have an eight-hour<\/p>\n<p>254<br \/>\n00:12:10,290 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:14,550<br \/>\nblock of a day and you know you always<\/p>\n<p>255<br \/>\n00:12:12,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:15,720<br \/>\nhave that eight hour block of a day and<\/p>\n<p>256<br \/>\n00:12:14,550 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:17,790<br \/>\nyou&#8217;re going to be working in the same<\/p>\n<p>257<br \/>\n00:12:15,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:20,700<br \/>\nspace with the same equipment and the<\/p>\n<p>258<br \/>\n00:12:17,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:23,670<br \/>\nsame software it&#8217;s much easier to plan<\/p>\n<p>259<br \/>\n00:12:20,700 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:26,430<br \/>\nsomething that&#8217;s going to flex but if<\/p>\n<p>260<br \/>\n00:12:23,670 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:29,130<br \/>\nyou&#8217;re out and about or you have hard<\/p>\n<p>261<br \/>\n00:12:26,430 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:31,260<br \/>\nscheduled activities or I&#8217;m gonna flip<\/p>\n<p>262<br \/>\n00:12:29,130 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:34,230<br \/>\nthis around a little bit if you&#8217;re a<\/p>\n<p>263<br \/>\n00:12:31,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:36,690<br \/>\nmanager or an executive that has a lot<\/p>\n<p>264<br \/>\n00:12:34,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:38,700<br \/>\nof meetings that are thrown at you not<\/p>\n<p>265<br \/>\n00:12:36,690 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:42,870<br \/>\nones of your own creation but once you<\/p>\n<p>266<br \/>\n00:12:38,700 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:45,420<br \/>\nkeep getting invited to then the<\/p>\n<p>267<br \/>\n00:12:42,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:49,320<br \/>\nsituation you&#8217;re in is you don&#8217;t have<\/p>\n<p>268<br \/>\n00:12:45,420 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:51,900<br \/>\ncontrol over a lot of those key drivers<\/p>\n<p>269<br \/>\n00:12:49,320 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:53,670<br \/>\nso you have to say okay what what are<\/p>\n<p>270<br \/>\n00:12:51,900 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:57,660<br \/>\nthe influences that are gonna mess these<\/p>\n<p>271<br \/>\n00:12:53,670 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:00,450<br \/>\ntasks up for me and what actually items<\/p>\n<p>272<br \/>\n00:12:57,660 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:03,360<br \/>\ndo I have control over if you don&#8217;t have<\/p>\n<p>273<br \/>\n00:13:00,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:06,360<br \/>\ncontrol over the length and the and the<\/p>\n<p>274<br \/>\n00:13:03,360 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:07,590<br \/>\nspacing of your time blocks then the<\/p>\n<p>275<br \/>\n00:13:06,360 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:09,540<br \/>\nonly thing you can really do<\/p>\n<p>276<br \/>\n00:13:07,590 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:11,570<br \/>\nhas chunked the tasks down in a way that<\/p>\n<p>277<br \/>\n00:13:09,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:13,410<br \/>\nthey become much more dynamic and that&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>278<br \/>\n00:13:11,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:15,120<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s where I started thinking about<\/p>\n<p>279<br \/>\n00:13:13,410 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:17,280<br \/>\nwhat we&#8217;re dealing with here I could see<\/p>\n<p>280<br \/>\n00:13:15,120 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:19,950<br \/>\nsomebody who had a master listing of<\/p>\n<p>281<br \/>\n00:13:17,280 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:22,440<br \/>\ntasks big tasks and having problems<\/p>\n<p>282<br \/>\n00:13:19,950 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:24,600<br \/>\nscheduling them well maybe they need to<\/p>\n<p>283<br \/>\n00:13:22,440 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:26,880<br \/>\nbe smaller maybe need to need to have<\/p>\n<p>284<br \/>\n00:13:24,600 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:28,860<br \/>\nmore little ones that can be broken up<\/p>\n<p>285<br \/>\n00:13:26,880 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:30,570<br \/>\nand fit into things now there&#8217;s a<\/p>\n<p>286<br \/>\n00:13:28,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:33,540<br \/>\ndiminishing point of return there as<\/p>\n<p>287<br \/>\n00:13:30,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:36,390<br \/>\nwell where you&#8217;re gonna have so many<\/p>\n<p>288<br \/>\n00:13:33,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:38,340<br \/>\nlittle things to try and juggle that you<\/p>\n<p>289<br \/>\n00:13:36,390 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:42,240<br \/>\nmay be transitioning in and out of work<\/p>\n<p>290<br \/>\n00:13:38,340 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:43,830<br \/>\ntoo quickly it it&#8217;s not optimal in<\/p>\n<p>291<br \/>\n00:13:42,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:46,560<br \/>\neither situation if you don&#8217;t have<\/p>\n<p>292<br \/>\n00:13:43,830 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:49,860<br \/>\ncontrol over either the workload or the<\/p>\n<p>293<br \/>\n00:13:46,560 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:51,600<br \/>\nschedule and if both are fairly out of<\/p>\n<p>294<br \/>\n00:13:49,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:54,270<br \/>\nyour control then it can be really<\/p>\n<p>295<br \/>\n00:13:51,600 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:56,820<br \/>\ndifficult that&#8217;s where you have to<\/p>\n<p>296<br \/>\n00:13:54,270 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:58,470<br \/>\nconstantly measure and evaluate your<\/p>\n<p>297<br \/>\n00:13:56,820 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:01,350<br \/>\nsystem look at the amount of stuff going<\/p>\n<p>298<br \/>\n00:13:58,470 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:03,720<br \/>\nin do the work look at how that work was<\/p>\n<p>299<br \/>\n00:14:01,350 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:06,630<br \/>\nsuccessful take a look at those metrics<\/p>\n<p>300<br \/>\n00:14:03,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:08,070<br \/>\nand say okay what worked what didn&#8217;t did<\/p>\n<p>301<br \/>\n00:14:06,630 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:09,960<br \/>\ncertain sized time blocks I have a<\/p>\n<p>302<br \/>\n00:14:08,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:12,810<br \/>\ngreater level of success or smaller ones<\/p>\n<p>303<br \/>\n00:14:09,960 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:14,460<br \/>\nand start to tune it and continue to<\/p>\n<p>304<br \/>\n00:14:12,810 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:16,050<br \/>\nrefine it I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re gonna<\/p>\n<p>305<br \/>\n00:14:14,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:18,660<br \/>\nfind anyone that you can flip a switch<\/p>\n<p>306<br \/>\n00:14:16,050 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:21,720<br \/>\nand and this stuff is gonna fit this<\/p>\n<p>307<br \/>\n00:14:18,660 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:23,340<br \/>\nparticular model I very much believe in<\/p>\n<p>308<br \/>\n00:14:21,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:25,590<br \/>\nthe concept of acceleration and<\/p>\n<p>309<br \/>\n00:14:23,340 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:28,230<br \/>\ndeceleration lanes when it comes to your<\/p>\n<p>310<br \/>\n00:14:25,590 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:30,090<br \/>\nproductivity routine and so I think<\/p>\n<p>311<br \/>\n00:14:28,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:33,030<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s really important I did want to I<\/p>\n<p>312<br \/>\n00:14:30,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:35,910<br \/>\nwant to jump back to to some comments<\/p>\n<p>313<br \/>\n00:14:33,030 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:38,250<br \/>\nthat Francis had made about this being a<\/p>\n<p>314<br \/>\n00:14:35,910 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:39,960<br \/>\nmemory limit issue and if we can sort of<\/p>\n<p>315<br \/>\n00:14:38,250 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:42,960<br \/>\nthink about this in terms of psychic RAM<\/p>\n<p>316<br \/>\n00:14:39,960 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:45,450<br \/>\nI hate to really analogize the brain to<\/p>\n<p>317<br \/>\n00:14:42,960 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:46,890<br \/>\na computer too much but if we think<\/p>\n<p>318<br \/>\n00:14:45,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:49,350<br \/>\nabout it from that perspective we have<\/p>\n<p>319<br \/>\n00:14:46,890 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:51,840<br \/>\nthis sense of psychic RAM and that<\/p>\n<p>320<br \/>\n00:14:49,350 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:54,810<br \/>\ntemporary memory storage does fill up<\/p>\n<p>321<br \/>\n00:14:51,840 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:56,340<br \/>\nvery quickly for us and so we need to be<\/p>\n<p>322<br \/>\n00:14:54,810 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:58,410<br \/>\nconscious of that but there are other<\/p>\n<p>323<br \/>\n00:14:56,340 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:00,780<br \/>\nlimits I think that also come into play<\/p>\n<p>324<br \/>\n00:14:58,410 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:02,880<br \/>\nwhich not necessarily the limits but<\/p>\n<p>325<br \/>\n00:15:00,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:07,220<br \/>\nother dimensions which is the emotional<\/p>\n<p>326<br \/>\n00:15:02,880 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:10,140<br \/>\ndimension typically measured in anxiety<\/p>\n<p>327<br \/>\n00:15:07,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:12,570<br \/>\nlevels and this is not really negative<\/p>\n<p>328<br \/>\n00:15:10,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:15,510<br \/>\nanxiety necessarily it&#8217;s just the<\/p>\n<p>329<br \/>\n00:15:12,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:17,760<br \/>\ndiscomfort you feel physically from the<\/p>\n<p>330<br \/>\n00:15:15,510 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:20,100<br \/>\nemotion of anxiety and I think that a<\/p>\n<p>331<br \/>\n00:15:17,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:21,240<br \/>\nlot of people don&#8217;t get that when we&#8217;re<\/p>\n<p>332<br \/>\n00:15:20,100 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:23,640<br \/>\ntalking about personal<\/p>\n<p>333<br \/>\n00:15:21,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:27,839<br \/>\nproductivity especially your individual<\/p>\n<p>334<br \/>\n00:15:23,640 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:30,240<br \/>\nanxiety levels will predispose you to a<\/p>\n<p>335<br \/>\n00:15:27,839 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:33,240<br \/>\nparticular type of action or non action<\/p>\n<p>336<br \/>\n00:15:30,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:34,440<br \/>\nright so that&#8217;s one particular thing<\/p>\n<p>337<br \/>\n00:15:33,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:36,720<br \/>\nthat we have to really take into account<\/p>\n<p>338<br \/>\n00:15:34,440 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:38,910<br \/>\nand then as well as motivation right how<\/p>\n<p>339<br \/>\n00:15:36,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:41,550<br \/>\nmotivated you are to do something or not<\/p>\n<p>340<br \/>\n00:15:38,910 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:44,520<br \/>\nwell then also play into it so I just<\/p>\n<p>341<br \/>\n00:15:41,550 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:46,230<br \/>\nwanted to add those maybe dimensions to<\/p>\n<p>342<br \/>\n00:15:44,520 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:48,810<br \/>\nthe concept that yes we get to a point<\/p>\n<p>343<br \/>\n00:15:46,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:50,940<br \/>\nin our adolescent and then preteen and<\/p>\n<p>344<br \/>\n00:15:48,810 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:54,089<br \/>\nteen years where things start to become<\/p>\n<p>345<br \/>\n00:15:50,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:56,250<br \/>\nsuch a maximum limit that we can keep<\/p>\n<p>346<br \/>\n00:15:54,089 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:59,250<br \/>\nrunning in terms of projects and actions<\/p>\n<p>347<br \/>\n00:15:56,250 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:00,720<br \/>\nthat we do start to keep lists but then<\/p>\n<p>348<br \/>\n00:15:59,250 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:03,089<br \/>\nwe get to this other point which is that<\/p>\n<p>349<br \/>\n00:16:00,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:05,940<br \/>\nif I&#8217;m type-a I&#8217;m predisposed to higher<\/p>\n<p>350<br \/>\n00:16:03,089 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:08,250<br \/>\nlevels of anxiety again not necessarily<\/p>\n<p>351<br \/>\n00:16:05,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:10,620<br \/>\na negative thing we need to we need to<\/p>\n<p>352<br \/>\n00:16:08,250 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:13,740<br \/>\nlearn how to manage those well and here<\/p>\n<p>353<br \/>\n00:16:10,620 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:16,260<br \/>\nin adulthood we recognize or we should<\/p>\n<p>354<br \/>\n00:16:13,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:18,420<br \/>\nrecognize I hope we recognize that<\/p>\n<p>355<br \/>\n00:16:16,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:20,250<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s something that&#8217;s going on under<\/p>\n<p>356<br \/>\n00:16:18,420 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:22,140<br \/>\nthe hood and we can then go ahead and<\/p>\n<p>357<br \/>\n00:16:20,250 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:24,839<br \/>\nsay okay I need more framework I need<\/p>\n<p>358<br \/>\n00:16:22,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:26,730<br \/>\nmore control versus perspective again<\/p>\n<p>359<br \/>\n00:16:24,839 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:29,190<br \/>\ngoing back to sort of GTD language in<\/p>\n<p>360<br \/>\n00:16:26,730 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:32,850<br \/>\norder to be able to reduce that stress<\/p>\n<p>361<br \/>\n00:16:29,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:35,880<br \/>\nand then increase the movement forward<\/p>\n<p>362<br \/>\n00:16:32,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:38,880<br \/>\non the flip side of this going back to<\/p>\n<p>363<br \/>\n00:16:35,880 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:40,890<br \/>\nsort of the the topic at hand I did want<\/p>\n<p>364<br \/>\n00:16:38,880 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:42,779<br \/>\nto sort of outline a little bit about<\/p>\n<p>365<br \/>\n00:16:40,890 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:45,740<br \/>\nthe way in which I approach this which<\/p>\n<p>366<br \/>\n00:16:42,779 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:50,990<br \/>\nis that for many years I have used time<\/p>\n<p>367<br \/>\n00:16:45,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:53,790<br \/>\navailable as the driving force behind<\/p>\n<p>368<br \/>\n00:16:50,990 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:56,279<br \/>\ncreating next actions and not<\/p>\n<p>369<br \/>\n00:16:53,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:59,040<br \/>\nnecessarily the traditional concept of<\/p>\n<p>370<br \/>\n00:16:56,279 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:01,140<br \/>\ncontext I see the efficiencies of making<\/p>\n<p>371<br \/>\n00:16:59,040 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:03,240<br \/>\ncalls together and sending emails<\/p>\n<p>372<br \/>\n00:17:01,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:06,150<br \/>\ntogether and so and so forth but I do<\/p>\n<p>373<br \/>\n00:17:03,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:10,199<br \/>\nnot I just know how I work I work very<\/p>\n<p>374<br \/>\n00:17:06,150 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:12,540<br \/>\nmuch project based and so there is this<\/p>\n<p>375<br \/>\n00:17:10,199 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:15,959<br \/>\nconcept for me that I need to finish I<\/p>\n<p>376<br \/>\n00:17:12,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:18,360<br \/>\nneed to complete some chunk what I call<\/p>\n<p>377<br \/>\n00:17:15,959 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:20,939<br \/>\na milestone which is up either a part of<\/p>\n<p>378<br \/>\n00:17:18,360 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:23,760<br \/>\na project or multiple projects together<\/p>\n<p>379<br \/>\n00:17:20,939 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:27,260<br \/>\nthat create an anchor around something<\/p>\n<p>380<br \/>\n00:17:23,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:30,179<br \/>\nand so many times I want to complete<\/p>\n<p>381<br \/>\n00:17:27,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:32,040<br \/>\nsome part of something in order to feel<\/p>\n<p>382<br \/>\n00:17:30,179 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:34,450<br \/>\naccomplished it&#8217;s not literally just<\/p>\n<p>383<br \/>\n00:17:32,040 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:37,779<br \/>\nchecking off one action for it<\/p>\n<p>384<br \/>\n00:17:34,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:39,370<br \/>\nthat gets me that dopamine kick it&#8217;s the<\/p>\n<p>385<br \/>\n00:17:37,779 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:42,370<br \/>\nit&#8217;s the knowing of completion of<\/p>\n<p>386<br \/>\n00:17:39,370 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:44,470<br \/>\nsomething so it&#8217;s rather intuitive and<\/p>\n<p>387<br \/>\n00:17:42,370 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:46,720<br \/>\niterative for me in terms of next action<\/p>\n<p>388<br \/>\n00:17:44,470 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:49,659<br \/>\nplanning and so over the years I&#8217;ve just<\/p>\n<p>389<br \/>\n00:17:46,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:52,240<br \/>\npaid attention and this again for me I&#8217;m<\/p>\n<p>390<br \/>\n00:17:49,659 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:54,760<br \/>\na quantified self err so I&#8217;m always<\/p>\n<p>391<br \/>\n00:17:52,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:58,750<br \/>\ntracking data about myself and I&#8217;ve<\/p>\n<p>392<br \/>\n00:17:54,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:59,440<br \/>\nlearned through past data how long it<\/p>\n<p>393<br \/>\n00:17:58,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:03,010<br \/>\ntakes me<\/p>\n<p>394<br \/>\n00:17:59,440 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:04,690<br \/>\non average usually a mean average that<\/p>\n<p>395<br \/>\n00:18:03,010 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:06,789<br \/>\nI&#8217;m taking not a modal average because I<\/p>\n<p>396<br \/>\n00:18:04,690 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:09,309<br \/>\nthink that can be a little bit a little<\/p>\n<p>397<br \/>\n00:18:06,789 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:12,549<br \/>\nless accurate than for some reason the<\/p>\n<p>398<br \/>\n00:18:09,309 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:15,519<br \/>\nmean average and so I then go in and I<\/p>\n<p>399<br \/>\n00:18:12,549 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:19,870<br \/>\nidentify how long things typically take<\/p>\n<p>400<br \/>\n00:18:15,519 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:22,630<br \/>\nfor me and thereby helping to inform me<\/p>\n<p>401<br \/>\n00:18:19,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:26,019<br \/>\ngoing forward when I look at how much<\/p>\n<p>402<br \/>\n00:18:22,630 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:27,850<br \/>\ntime available I have and the actions<\/p>\n<p>403<br \/>\n00:18:26,019 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:31,240<br \/>\nthat are necessary to bring me to<\/p>\n<p>404<br \/>\n00:18:27,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:34,870<br \/>\nfruition does that make sense guys it<\/p>\n<p>405<br \/>\n00:18:31,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:37,059<br \/>\ndoes it parallels as I mentioned the<\/p>\n<p>406<br \/>\n00:18:34,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:38,380<br \/>\nproject management space I look at<\/p>\n<p>407<br \/>\n00:18:37,059 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:41,350<br \/>\nthings a little bit differently because<\/p>\n<p>408<br \/>\n00:18:38,380 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:43,630<br \/>\nI come from a pre-sales sales kind of<\/p>\n<p>409<br \/>\n00:18:41,350 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:45,899<br \/>\nbackground for a long time and a lot of<\/p>\n<p>410<br \/>\n00:18:43,630 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:48,940<br \/>\nits estimation at work prior to doing it<\/p>\n<p>411<br \/>\n00:18:45,899 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:52,029<br \/>\nfor to get somebody to agree that you&#8217;re<\/p>\n<p>412<br \/>\n00:18:48,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:55,630<br \/>\ngonna do it so for me it&#8217;s a matter of<\/p>\n<p>413<br \/>\n00:18:52,029 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:57,130<br \/>\nlooking at historical completion which<\/p>\n<p>414<br \/>\n00:18:55,630 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:59,049<br \/>\nis a lot of the measurements that you&#8217;re<\/p>\n<p>415<br \/>\n00:18:57,130 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:00,880<br \/>\ntalking about and then being able to say<\/p>\n<p>416<br \/>\n00:18:59,049 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:03,309<br \/>\nwell how close to that historical<\/p>\n<p>417<br \/>\n00:19:00,880 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:05,710<br \/>\naccuracy can we get in the estimation of<\/p>\n<p>418<br \/>\n00:19:03,309 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:08,559<br \/>\nthis particular task to say it&#8217;s going<\/p>\n<p>419<br \/>\n00:19:05,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:10,899<br \/>\nto take X number of hours to do now<\/p>\n<p>420<br \/>\n00:19:08,559 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:12,789<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s on a larger scale and not often<\/p>\n<p>421<br \/>\n00:19:10,899 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:15,130<br \/>\nare we booking are we thinking about<\/p>\n<p>422<br \/>\n00:19:12,789 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:16,809<br \/>\nthings in just our daily activity where<\/p>\n<p>423<br \/>\n00:19:15,130 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:19,330<br \/>\nwe&#8217;re saying okay this is going to be an<\/p>\n<p>424<br \/>\n00:19:16,809 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:21,700<br \/>\neight-hour task or a 16-hour task I mean<\/p>\n<p>425<br \/>\n00:19:19,330 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:23,760<br \/>\nwe break it down more granularly than<\/p>\n<p>426<br \/>\n00:19:21,700 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:30,250<br \/>\nthat at least I think we do I know I do<\/p>\n<p>427<br \/>\n00:19:23,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:35,049<br \/>\nso looking at that kind of pre-planning<\/p>\n<p>428<br \/>\n00:19:30,250 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:37,419<br \/>\nI have to wonder maybe to make it a<\/p>\n<p>429<br \/>\n00:19:35,049 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:39,580<br \/>\nlittle less daunting maybe being able to<\/p>\n<p>430<br \/>\n00:19:37,419 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:42,250<br \/>\nbreak things down into buckets are<\/p>\n<p>431<br \/>\n00:19:39,580 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:44,799<br \/>\nhelpful you know start to identify tasks<\/p>\n<p>432<br \/>\n00:19:42,250 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:47,110<br \/>\nwith context not so much around duration<\/p>\n<p>433<br \/>\n00:19:44,799 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:48,880<br \/>\nbut estimated size this<\/p>\n<p>434<br \/>\n00:19:47,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:50,950<br \/>\na small test this is a medium test this<\/p>\n<p>435<br \/>\n00:19:48,880 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:54,040<br \/>\nis a large task understanding that that<\/p>\n<p>436<br \/>\n00:19:50,950 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:56,200<br \/>\ntranslates to roughly a half hour<\/p>\n<p>437<br \/>\n00:19:54,040 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:58,480<br \/>\nroughly an hour roughly two hours and<\/p>\n<p>438<br \/>\n00:19:56,200 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:02,679<br \/>\nthen you can go through and juggle your<\/p>\n<p>439<br \/>\n00:19:58,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:04,240<br \/>\nyour planning accordingly I think a lot<\/p>\n<p>440<br \/>\n00:20:02,679 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:06,610<br \/>\nof this honestly from what I&#8217;m hearing<\/p>\n<p>441<br \/>\n00:20:04,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:09,790<br \/>\nfrom all of us is going to be a lot of<\/p>\n<p>442<br \/>\n00:20:06,610 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:12,460<br \/>\ntrial and error in methodology there is<\/p>\n<p>443<br \/>\n00:20:09,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:14,890<br \/>\nno that I&#8217;ve heard there&#8217;s no formulaic<\/p>\n<p>444<br \/>\n00:20:12,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:16,600<br \/>\nway to approach this because it&#8217;s going<\/p>\n<p>445<br \/>\n00:20:14,890 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:19,419<br \/>\nto vary depending on the type of work<\/p>\n<p>446<br \/>\n00:20:16,600 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:21,820<br \/>\nyou&#8217;re doing and the one thing we<\/p>\n<p>447<br \/>\n00:20:19,419 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:23,679<br \/>\nhaven&#8217;t talked about what happens when<\/p>\n<p>448<br \/>\n00:20:21,820 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:25,179<br \/>\nthis planning breaks what happens when<\/p>\n<p>449<br \/>\n00:20:23,679 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:30,400<br \/>\nsomething jumps into it what happens<\/p>\n<p>450<br \/>\n00:20:25,179 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:34,960<br \/>\nwhen a task goes off the rails I I can<\/p>\n<p>451<br \/>\n00:20:30,400 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:36,850<br \/>\nshare some of my own history here I I<\/p>\n<p>452<br \/>\n00:20:34,960 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:41,820<br \/>\nrecently was two years ago<\/p>\n<p>453<br \/>\n00:20:36,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:44,970<br \/>\nmade the switch from from managing my<\/p>\n<p>454<br \/>\n00:20:41,820 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:47,640<br \/>\nbeen manipulating my own calendar I<\/p>\n<p>455<br \/>\n00:20:44,970 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:50,290<br \/>\nmentioned using an auto scheduler before<\/p>\n<p>456<br \/>\n00:20:47,640 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:52,900<br \/>\nand I&#8217;ve been I&#8217;ve been manipulating my<\/p>\n<p>457<br \/>\n00:20:50,290 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:58,540<br \/>\nown calendar or a calendar of all my<\/p>\n<p>458<br \/>\n00:20:52,900 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:00,490<br \/>\ntasks for this about 2001 I think and I<\/p>\n<p>459<br \/>\n00:20:58,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:02,440<br \/>\nhad a break in between when I thought I<\/p>\n<p>460<br \/>\n00:21:00,490 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:04,270<br \/>\ncould find something better and turned<\/p>\n<p>461<br \/>\n00:21:02,440 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:07,809<br \/>\nout to be worse but any we have been<\/p>\n<p>462<br \/>\n00:21:04,270 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:10,570<br \/>\ntrying to do this manually for 15 years<\/p>\n<p>463<br \/>\n00:21:07,809 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:12,280<br \/>\nand then two years ago I made the<\/p>\n<p>464<br \/>\n00:21:10,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:15,190<br \/>\ntransition to using an auto scheduler<\/p>\n<p>465<br \/>\n00:21:12,280 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:18,250<br \/>\nand and I had them difficulty most<\/p>\n<p>466<br \/>\n00:21:15,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:22,710<br \/>\npeople have which is that it&#8217;s it&#8217;s hard<\/p>\n<p>467<br \/>\n00:21:18,250 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:26,500<br \/>\nto to figure out the right calendar<\/p>\n<p>468<br \/>\n00:21:22,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:28,210<br \/>\nmanually and to keep it updated so a<\/p>\n<p>469<br \/>\n00:21:26,500 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:30,880<br \/>\nbooster is probably you know looking at<\/p>\n<p>470<br \/>\n00:21:28,210 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:32,710<br \/>\nyou know I have I have 20 hours<\/p>\n<p>471<br \/>\n00:21:30,880 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:34,390<br \/>\navailable each week that I&#8217;m not in<\/p>\n<p>472<br \/>\n00:21:32,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:35,740<br \/>\nmeetings I&#8217;m not traveling and it&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>473<br \/>\n00:21:34,390 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:38,650<br \/>\ndiscretionary<\/p>\n<p>474<br \/>\n00:21:35,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:41,950<br \/>\nI have 30 hours of activity to put into<\/p>\n<p>475<br \/>\n00:21:38,650 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:44,730<br \/>\nthat 20 hours how do I figure out what&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>476<br \/>\n00:21:41,950 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:48,070<br \/>\nthe best 20 hours to pick from the 30<\/p>\n<p>477<br \/>\n00:21:44,730 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:49,929<br \/>\nknow doing that manually is very very<\/p>\n<p>478<br \/>\n00:21:48,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:52,299<br \/>\nvery terms of to be very very very hard<\/p>\n<p>479<br \/>\n00:21:49,929 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:54,309<br \/>\nI can see from experience because you<\/p>\n<p>480<br \/>\n00:21:52,299 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:56,830<br \/>\nyou&#8217;re juggling multiple attributes<\/p>\n<p>481<br \/>\n00:21:54,309 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:59,590<br \/>\nfiguring out what&#8217;s high priority was<\/p>\n<p>482<br \/>\n00:21:56,830 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:01,990<br \/>\nurgent and that changes every day and<\/p>\n<p>483<br \/>\n00:21:59,590 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:03,639<br \/>\nyou got to redo your schedule whenever<\/p>\n<p>484<br \/>\n00:22:01,990 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:06,039<br \/>\nthere&#8217;s a surprise and all of a sudden<\/p>\n<p>485<br \/>\n00:22:03,639 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:08,019<br \/>\nyou have a late flight and messes<\/p>\n<p>486<br \/>\n00:22:06,039 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:10,179<br \/>\neverything up but so you&#8217;re always<\/p>\n<p>487<br \/>\n00:22:08,019 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:11,559<br \/>\njuggling juggling and rescheduling and<\/p>\n<p>488<br \/>\n00:22:10,179 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:13,419<br \/>\nyou&#8217;re doing it manually you&#8217;re trying<\/p>\n<p>489<br \/>\n00:22:11,559 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:16,090<br \/>\nto use a lot of psychic I&#8217;m according to<\/p>\n<p>490<br \/>\n00:22:13,419 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:17,860<br \/>\nI thought it&#8217;s furry to try and come up<\/p>\n<p>491<br \/>\n00:22:16,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:21,129<br \/>\nwith a schedule that looks feasible and<\/p>\n<p>492<br \/>\n00:22:17,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:23,019<br \/>\nhave it be feasible all the time the<\/p>\n<p>493<br \/>\n00:22:21,129 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:26,139<br \/>\nwhen I started using an auto schedule a<\/p>\n<p>494<br \/>\n00:22:23,019 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:27,730<br \/>\ncouple years ago it took away all of the<\/p>\n<p>495<br \/>\n00:22:26,139 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:30,009<br \/>\nmanual effort because no with the click<\/p>\n<p>496<br \/>\n00:22:27,730 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:32,230<br \/>\nof a button I instantly have an optimal<\/p>\n<p>497<br \/>\n00:22:30,009 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:36,909<br \/>\nschedule but what I&#8217;ve noticed since<\/p>\n<p>498<br \/>\n00:22:32,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:39,100<br \/>\nthen is is but because I&#8217;m scheduling so<\/p>\n<p>499<br \/>\n00:22:36,909 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:42,690<br \/>\nfrequently which is multiple times a day<\/p>\n<p>500<br \/>\n00:22:39,100 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:45,490<br \/>\nand I&#8217;m not using my own energy to do it<\/p>\n<p>501<br \/>\n00:22:42,690 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:48,190<br \/>\nI&#8217;ve become a sort of a better scheduler<\/p>\n<p>502<br \/>\n00:22:45,490 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:53,830<br \/>\nin the sense that I&#8217;m a better estimator<\/p>\n<p>503<br \/>\n00:22:48,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:55,119<br \/>\nso I I because I&#8217;m I&#8217;m the lies that I<\/p>\n<p>504<br \/>\n00:22:53,830 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:58,029<br \/>\nused to tell myself and I used to get<\/p>\n<p>505<br \/>\n00:22:55,119 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:00,580<br \/>\naway with it slowly taken oh no I can<\/p>\n<p>506<br \/>\n00:22:58,029 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:02,470<br \/>\nsee where where that cost me something<\/p>\n<p>507<br \/>\n00:23:00,580 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:04,629<br \/>\nin my schedule it cost me time and<\/p>\n<p>508<br \/>\n00:23:02,470 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:08,139<br \/>\nenergy so I become a far better<\/p>\n<p>509<br \/>\n00:23:04,629 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:10,980<br \/>\nestimator and much less of a more more<\/p>\n<p>510<br \/>\n00:23:08,139 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:14,950<br \/>\ntruthful and how long things tick and<\/p>\n<p>511<br \/>\n00:23:10,980 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:17,649<br \/>\nhow good and how well I can follow my<\/p>\n<p>512<br \/>\n00:23:14,950 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:20,860<br \/>\nown schedule so of course I have history<\/p>\n<p>513<br \/>\n00:23:17,649 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:22,960<br \/>\nno because I have I&#8217;m actually system<\/p>\n<p>514<br \/>\n00:23:20,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:26,700<br \/>\ngathers gathers some data that you can<\/p>\n<p>515<br \/>\n00:23:22,960 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:29,769<br \/>\ngo back and look at prior activities<\/p>\n<p>516<br \/>\n00:23:26,700 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:32,950<br \/>\nI&#8217;ve become way more granular as you can<\/p>\n<p>517<br \/>\n00:23:29,769 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:36,909<br \/>\nimagine because when I when I did manual<\/p>\n<p>518<br \/>\n00:23:32,950 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:41,049<br \/>\nscheduling and this was using a Google<\/p>\n<p>519<br \/>\n00:23:36,909 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:42,909<br \/>\nCalendar mostly it was really hard to<\/p>\n<p>520<br \/>\n00:23:41,049 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:44,799<br \/>\nschedule a lot of items so the smallest<\/p>\n<p>521<br \/>\n00:23:42,909 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:46,570<br \/>\ntime block I could possibly manage was<\/p>\n<p>522<br \/>\n00:23:44,799 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:48,039<br \/>\nabout a half an hour I would never go<\/p>\n<p>523<br \/>\n00:23:46,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:51,460<br \/>\nlower than that because it was just too<\/p>\n<p>524<br \/>\n00:23:48,039 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:53,740<br \/>\nhard to manipulate so many tasks no<\/p>\n<p>525<br \/>\n00:23:51,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:55,629<br \/>\nhowever I can go down to five and ten<\/p>\n<p>526<br \/>\n00:23:53,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:58,179<br \/>\nminutes if I want because I&#8217;m the one<\/p>\n<p>527<br \/>\n00:23:55,629 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:59,740<br \/>\ndoing all the hard work it accumulates<\/p>\n<p>528<br \/>\n00:23:58,179 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:02,769<br \/>\nsmall tasks put them to get put them<\/p>\n<p>529<br \/>\n00:23:59,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:04,629<br \/>\ntogether in different ways and so it<\/p>\n<p>530<br \/>\n00:24:02,769 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:06,999<br \/>\ntakes away all of the hard work so I&#8217;ve<\/p>\n<p>531<br \/>\n00:24:04,629 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:12,490<br \/>\nbecome way more precise and more<\/p>\n<p>532<br \/>\n00:24:06,999 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:14,009<br \/>\naccurate just because I&#8217;m less exhausted<\/p>\n<p>533<br \/>\n00:24:12,490 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:18,059<br \/>\ntrying to keep up<\/p>\n<p>534<br \/>\n00:24:14,009 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:20,289<br \/>\nwith my my my schedule of all my tasks<\/p>\n<p>535<br \/>\n00:24:18,059 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:22,570<br \/>\nsomething else is doing the hard work<\/p>\n<p>536<br \/>\n00:24:20,289 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:24,479<br \/>\nand I&#8217;ve become way more smarter in the<\/p>\n<p>537<br \/>\n00:24:22,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:26,679<br \/>\nlast couple of years just because I&#8217;m<\/p>\n<p>538<br \/>\n00:24:24,479 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:29,340<br \/>\npreserving energy and putting it to<\/p>\n<p>539<br \/>\n00:24:26,679 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:33,729<br \/>\nwhere it&#8217;s sort of I guess better used<\/p>\n<p>540<br \/>\n00:24:29,340 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:39,100<br \/>\nit&#8217;s my experience so it&#8217;s interesting<\/p>\n<p>541<br \/>\n00:24:33,729 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:42,039<br \/>\nbecause the discussion you know bring a<\/p>\n<p>542<br \/>\n00:24:39,100 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:47,379<br \/>\nbunch of interesting elements to<\/p>\n<p>543<br \/>\n00:24:42,039 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:53,979<br \/>\nconsider years ago when I was well<\/p>\n<p>544<br \/>\n00:24:47,379 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:56,739<br \/>\nalmost as heavy road warrior as what my<\/p>\n<p>545<br \/>\n00:24:53,979 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:58,659<br \/>\nworkload is turning right now to be I<\/p>\n<p>546<br \/>\n00:24:56,739 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:03,759<br \/>\ncan see there are a lot of those things<\/p>\n<p>547<br \/>\n00:24:58,659 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:06,940<br \/>\nand when my roles change to a more fixed<\/p>\n<p>548<br \/>\n00:25:03,759 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:09,220<br \/>\nasset and you know we&#8217;re traveling now<\/p>\n<p>549<br \/>\n00:25:06,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:11,799<br \/>\nwas something that almost happened only<\/p>\n<p>550<br \/>\n00:25:09,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:14,830<br \/>\nfor vacation instead of work or<\/p>\n<p>551<br \/>\n00:25:11,799 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:18,549<br \/>\nconstantly for work the nature of how I<\/p>\n<p>552<br \/>\n00:25:14,830 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:21,960<br \/>\nclassify and how I look into next<\/p>\n<p>553<br \/>\n00:25:18,549 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:24,489<br \/>\nactions and projects and other things<\/p>\n<p>554<br \/>\n00:25:21,960 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:26,379<br \/>\nchange with it so it&#8217;s it&#8217;s quite<\/p>\n<p>555<br \/>\n00:25:24,489 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:29,470<br \/>\ninteresting to look to look at it I<\/p>\n<p>556<br \/>\n00:25:26,379 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:31,960<br \/>\ndon&#8217;t remember and that doesn&#8217;t mean<\/p>\n<p>557<br \/>\n00:25:29,470 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:35,739<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s how I may have done it<\/p>\n<p>558<br \/>\n00:25:31,960 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:37,840<br \/>\nunconsciously to have you know a time<\/p>\n<p>559<br \/>\n00:25:35,739 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:40,320<br \/>\nbucket for example it was just have<\/p>\n<p>560<br \/>\n00:25:37,840 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:45,029<br \/>\nactions based on software but or<\/p>\n<p>561<br \/>\n00:25:40,320 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:50,739<br \/>\nlocation mostly software because I said<\/p>\n<p>562<br \/>\n00:25:45,029 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:55,590<br \/>\nmy role was heavy on the travel side you<\/p>\n<p>563<br \/>\n00:25:50,739 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:59,649<br \/>\nknow I was doing at that time over<\/p>\n<p>564<br \/>\n00:25:55,590 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:02,229<br \/>\n250,000 miles in planes so but I had the<\/p>\n<p>565<br \/>\n00:25:59,649 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:05,080<br \/>\nthings I have now that I&#8217;m now that I<\/p>\n<p>566<br \/>\n00:26:02,229 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:08,379<br \/>\nmentioned that I remembered yes I had a<\/p>\n<p>567<br \/>\n00:26:05,080 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:10,239<br \/>\ncertain list there were things to do on<\/p>\n<p>568<br \/>\n00:26:08,379 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:13,299<br \/>\na planes mostly because planes tend to<\/p>\n<p>569<br \/>\n00:26:10,239 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:16,090<br \/>\nyou or tend to be at that time longer<\/p>\n<p>570<br \/>\n00:26:13,299 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:20,529<br \/>\nworking time so maybe unconsciously I<\/p>\n<p>571<br \/>\n00:26:16,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:22,509<br \/>\nwas temporary tagging for time without<\/p>\n<p>572<br \/>\n00:26:20,529 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:25,599<br \/>\nnecessarily being aware that is part of<\/p>\n<p>573<br \/>\n00:26:22,509 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:28,119<br \/>\nwhat he&#8217;s having on this change towards<\/p>\n<p>574<br \/>\n00:26:25,599 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:29,830<br \/>\nthe other side when when you change from<\/p>\n<p>575<br \/>\n00:26:28,119 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:33,429<br \/>\nbeing a road warrior and never have time<\/p>\n<p>576<br \/>\n00:26:29,830 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:35,379<br \/>\nto be on the office and have oh what<\/p>\n<p>577<br \/>\n00:26:33,429 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:39,070<br \/>\nseems like an unlimited supply of time<\/p>\n<p>578<br \/>\n00:26:35,379 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:43,029<br \/>\nit&#8217;s not a problem turning the wheels so<\/p>\n<p>579<br \/>\n00:26:39,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:48,159<br \/>\ngoing from the office to now this highly<\/p>\n<p>580<br \/>\n00:26:43,029 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:52,090<br \/>\nconstrained working environment it&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>581<br \/>\n00:26:48,159 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:55,659<br \/>\nwhat has thrown at least mine a range to<\/p>\n<p>582<br \/>\n00:26:52,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:59,009<br \/>\nmy system and and made me consider where<\/p>\n<p>583<br \/>\n00:26:55,659 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:01,570<br \/>\nwhere can be or where are the potential<\/p>\n<p>584<br \/>\n00:26:59,009 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:02,200<br \/>\nelements that I&#8217;m ignoring and I&#8217;m not<\/p>\n<p>585<br \/>\n00:27:01,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:05,200<br \/>\nlooking<\/p>\n<p>586<br \/>\n00:27:02,200 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:07,980<br \/>\nthere are causing trouble I think it&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>587<br \/>\n00:27:05,200 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:14,559<br \/>\nreally important here for us to identify<\/p>\n<p>588<br \/>\n00:27:07,980 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:18,669<br \/>\nfor our audience what we can do to<\/p>\n<p>589<br \/>\n00:27:14,559 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:22,450<br \/>\nidentify when things change so that is<\/p>\n<p>590<br \/>\n00:27:18,669 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:25,869<br \/>\nto say when when is when is it<\/p>\n<p>591<br \/>\n00:27:22,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:28,269<br \/>\nappropriate for us to do that kind of<\/p>\n<p>592<br \/>\n00:27:25,869 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:30,629<br \/>\nreview and reflection what what are the<\/p>\n<p>593<br \/>\n00:27:28,269 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:34,690<br \/>\nkey indicators that tell us that<\/p>\n<p>594<br \/>\n00:27:30,629 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:38,589<br \/>\nsomething has shifted and therefore time<\/p>\n<p>595<br \/>\n00:27:34,690 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:40,330<br \/>\navailable context the length of time of<\/p>\n<p>596<br \/>\n00:27:38,589 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:42,759<br \/>\nparticular next actions that you would<\/p>\n<p>597<br \/>\n00:27:40,330 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:44,710<br \/>\ndo in one context say sitting at your<\/p>\n<p>598<br \/>\n00:27:42,759 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:49,330<br \/>\ndesk now needs to be done<\/p>\n<p>599<br \/>\n00:27:44,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:53,169<br \/>\nsay out in the field or on a plane train<\/p>\n<p>600<br \/>\n00:27:49,330 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:55,929<br \/>\nbus what have you and now cannot be done<\/p>\n<p>601<br \/>\n00:27:53,169 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:57,849<br \/>\nor say you&#8217;re driving so no longer can<\/p>\n<p>602<br \/>\n00:27:55,929 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:59,529<br \/>\nyou use that time and and that&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>603<br \/>\n00:27:57,849 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:01,929<br \/>\nsomething that has affected me quite<\/p>\n<p>604<br \/>\n00:27:59,529 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:04,720<br \/>\ngreatly in the last year year and a half<\/p>\n<p>605<br \/>\n00:28:01,929 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:06,519<br \/>\nis you know I&#8217;m driving a lot more today<\/p>\n<p>606<br \/>\n00:28:04,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:08,559<br \/>\nthan I used to and that has<\/p>\n<p>607<br \/>\n00:28:06,519 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:11,229<br \/>\nfundamentally changed the way in which I<\/p>\n<p>608<br \/>\n00:28:08,559 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:14,049<br \/>\nget things done so what are the things<\/p>\n<p>609<br \/>\n00:28:11,229 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:16,570<br \/>\nthat you all sort of identify as those<\/p>\n<p>610<br \/>\n00:28:14,049 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:18,190<br \/>\nthings and and how do you how do you<\/p>\n<p>611<br \/>\n00:28:16,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:20,109<br \/>\nchange with them Francis do you want to<\/p>\n<p>612<br \/>\n00:28:18,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:21,429<br \/>\nget started yeah well funny funny you<\/p>\n<p>613<br \/>\n00:28:20,109 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:22,629<br \/>\nknow if I&#8217;ve actually been thinking<\/p>\n<p>614<br \/>\n00:28:21,429 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:24,639<br \/>\nabout this one<\/p>\n<p>615<br \/>\n00:28:22,629 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:27,309<br \/>\nI&#8217;m right they&#8217;re gonna at the global<\/p>\n<p>616<br \/>\n00:28:24,639 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:29,499<br \/>\nwhat you should pick us your next task<\/p>\n<p>617<br \/>\n00:28:27,309 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:31,599<br \/>\nmanager&#8217; how to decide what your next<\/p>\n<p>618<br \/>\n00:28:29,499 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:33,159<br \/>\ntask manager should be which is very<\/p>\n<p>619<br \/>\n00:28:31,599 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:35,409<br \/>\nsimple it was very similar to what we&#8217;re<\/p>\n<p>620<br \/>\n00:28:33,159 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:37,450<br \/>\ntalking about here which is when things<\/p>\n<p>621<br \/>\n00:28:35,409 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:40,899<br \/>\nchange how do you figure<\/p>\n<p>622<br \/>\n00:28:37,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:42,880<br \/>\nwhat the next approach should be and I<\/p>\n<p>623<br \/>\n00:28:40,899 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:43,809<br \/>\ncame up with a calculator to try and<\/p>\n<p>624<br \/>\n00:28:42,880 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:46,779<br \/>\nfigure out okay<\/p>\n<p>625<br \/>\n00:28:43,809 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:50,110<br \/>\nif you take this particular test then it<\/p>\n<p>626<br \/>\n00:28:46,779 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:52,740<br \/>\nshould tell you when you are ripe for a<\/p>\n<p>627<br \/>\n00:28:50,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:55,659<br \/>\nchange and I&#8217;ll tell you some of the<\/p>\n<p>628<br \/>\n00:28:52,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:59,409<br \/>\nindicators I came so one was the state<\/p>\n<p>629<br \/>\n00:28:55,659 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:03,399<br \/>\nof your email inbox so if if all of a<\/p>\n<p>630<br \/>\n00:28:59,409 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:05,460<br \/>\nsudden there is a an overwhelming number<\/p>\n<p>631<br \/>\n00:29:03,399 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:08,200<br \/>\nof emails that you&#8217;re not responding to<\/p>\n<p>632<br \/>\n00:29:05,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:10,389<br \/>\nin your inbox or you used to be doing<\/p>\n<p>633<br \/>\n00:29:08,200 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:13,269<br \/>\nzero inbox and you&#8217;re no longer doing it<\/p>\n<p>634<br \/>\n00:29:10,389 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:15,159<br \/>\nthen it&#8217;s an indicator that something<\/p>\n<p>635<br \/>\n00:29:13,269 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:19,620<br \/>\nhas changed and you need it your system<\/p>\n<p>636<br \/>\n00:29:15,159 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:23,019<br \/>\nand you upload the other ones<\/p>\n<p>637<br \/>\n00:29:19,620 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:24,970<br \/>\nfeelings of overwhelm as you look at<\/p>\n<p>638<br \/>\n00:29:23,019 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:27,820<br \/>\nyour list you have this sort of feeling<\/p>\n<p>639<br \/>\n00:29:24,970 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:30,010<br \/>\nof dread it&#8217;s all about it it&#8217;s an<\/p>\n<p>640<br \/>\n00:29:27,820 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:32,710<br \/>\nemotional measure it&#8217;s not you know a<\/p>\n<p>641<br \/>\n00:29:30,010 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:35,639<br \/>\npractical measure but another practical<\/p>\n<p>642<br \/>\n00:29:32,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:39,190<br \/>\nsort of measurable would be how many<\/p>\n<p>643<br \/>\n00:29:35,639 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:41,440<br \/>\ntasks are falling through the cracks so<\/p>\n<p>644<br \/>\n00:29:39,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:44,500<br \/>\nhow many are you just losing track of<\/p>\n<p>645<br \/>\n00:29:41,440 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:46,149<br \/>\nthat you intended to do this week or it<\/p>\n<p>646<br \/>\n00:29:44,500 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:48,039<br \/>\nhad to be done this week it had a very<\/p>\n<p>647<br \/>\n00:29:46,149 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:51,070<br \/>\nhigh intention and a consequence for not<\/p>\n<p>648<br \/>\n00:29:48,039 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:52,720<br \/>\ndoing it and you&#8217;re not able to do<\/p>\n<p>649<br \/>\n00:29:51,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:54,820<br \/>\nyou&#8217;re not able to you weren&#8217;t able to<\/p>\n<p>650<br \/>\n00:29:52,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:56,460<br \/>\ndo it and the number of tasks that are<\/p>\n<p>651<br \/>\n00:29:54,820 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:00,970<br \/>\nfalling through the cracks are<\/p>\n<p>652<br \/>\n00:29:56,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:02,529<br \/>\nincreasing so that&#8217;s a there&#8217;s no system<\/p>\n<p>653<br \/>\n00:30:00,970 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:05,350<br \/>\nmanual that actually measures that and<\/p>\n<p>654<br \/>\n00:30:02,529 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:09,039<br \/>\nit will take a manual sort of recording<\/p>\n<p>655<br \/>\n00:30:05,350 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:11,649<br \/>\nor when that happens but those are a<\/p>\n<p>656<br \/>\n00:30:09,039 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:14,740<br \/>\ncouple that I have included in my my<\/p>\n<p>657<br \/>\n00:30:11,649 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:17,260<br \/>\ncalculator which I can&#8217;t recommend to<\/p>\n<p>658<br \/>\n00:30:14,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:18,460<br \/>\nanyone because it&#8217;s so ugly but anyway<\/p>\n<p>659<br \/>\n00:30:17,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:20,889<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s that&#8217;s a couple that I came up<\/p>\n<p>660<br \/>\n00:30:18,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:24,460<br \/>\nwith yeah this this is one of those<\/p>\n<p>661<br \/>\n00:30:20,889 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:25,450<br \/>\ntough ones though that each one of us is<\/p>\n<p>662<br \/>\n00:30:24,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:27,399<br \/>\nlooking at it from a different<\/p>\n<p>663<br \/>\n00:30:25,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:29,309<br \/>\nperspective I can understand why people<\/p>\n<p>664<br \/>\n00:30:27,399 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:32,110<br \/>\nget frustrated with this problem because<\/p>\n<p>665<br \/>\n00:30:29,309 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:35,549<br \/>\nthere are so many different ways to try<\/p>\n<p>666<br \/>\n00:30:32,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:40,870<br \/>\nand tackle it and none of them have a<\/p>\n<p>667<br \/>\n00:30:35,549 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:43,570<br \/>\nclear end point as to yes this will work<\/p>\n<p>668<br \/>\n00:30:40,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:47,799<br \/>\nor no this is not going to work I mean I<\/p>\n<p>669<br \/>\n00:30:43,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:49,629<br \/>\ncould really see okay I&#8217;m going to flip<\/p>\n<p>670<br \/>\n00:30:47,799 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:50,970<br \/>\nkind of flip the equation here a little<\/p>\n<p>671<br \/>\n00:30:49,629 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:54,760<br \/>\nbit<\/p>\n<p>672<br \/>\n00:30:50,970 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:56,230<br \/>\nwhat&#8217;s the core problem we&#8217;ve gone down<\/p>\n<p>673<br \/>\n00:30:54,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:57,820<br \/>\na bunch of rabbit holes here but I think<\/p>\n<p>674<br \/>\n00:30:56,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:59,500<br \/>\nwe need to back up and go back to the<\/p>\n<p>675<br \/>\n00:30:57,820 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:03,070<br \/>\noriginal problem that we&#8217;re trying to<\/p>\n<p>676<br \/>\n00:30:59,500 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:04,950<br \/>\nsolve so augusto question for you based<\/p>\n<p>677<br \/>\n00:31:03,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:07,900<br \/>\non everything that you&#8217;ve heard so far<\/p>\n<p>678<br \/>\n00:31:04,950 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:12,400<br \/>\nhas any of this actually addressed the<\/p>\n<p>679<br \/>\n00:31:07,900 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:16,320<br \/>\ncore problem that you see as a person<\/p>\n<p>680<br \/>\n00:31:12,400 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:19,090<br \/>\nwho has heard the short answer is no but<\/p>\n<p>681<br \/>\n00:31:16,320 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:21,010<br \/>\nthis has uncovered something quite<\/p>\n<p>682<br \/>\n00:31:19,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:24,100<br \/>\ninteresting that you just mentioned the<\/p>\n<p>683<br \/>\n00:31:21,010 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:28,600<br \/>\nproblem has been poorly State so that is<\/p>\n<p>684<br \/>\n00:31:24,100 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:32,110<br \/>\na possibility or the simple answer to<\/p>\n<p>685<br \/>\n00:31:28,600 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:35,440<br \/>\nthis is a lot more complex than what i<\/p>\n<p>686<br \/>\n00:31:32,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:37,660<br \/>\neven i was estimating that is exactly<\/p>\n<p>687<br \/>\n00:31:35,440 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:42,940<br \/>\npart of the reason I wanted to brought<\/p>\n<p>688<br \/>\n00:31:37,660 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:46,300<br \/>\nthis topic to the show because changing<\/p>\n<p>689<br \/>\n00:31:42,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:48,790<br \/>\non your work conditions internally we<\/p>\n<p>690<br \/>\n00:31:46,300 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:52,240<br \/>\neven with and without a promotion they<\/p>\n<p>691<br \/>\n00:31:48,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:56,220<br \/>\nhappen to everybody who is doing the the<\/p>\n<p>692<br \/>\n00:31:52,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:59,050<br \/>\nsystem and and I haven&#8217;t seen a lot of<\/p>\n<p>693<br \/>\n00:31:56,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:01,660<br \/>\ndiscussion on the topic right and trust<\/p>\n<p>694<br \/>\n00:31:59,050 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:03,790<br \/>\nme I search for it okay but this<\/p>\n<p>695<br \/>\n00:32:01,660 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:06,160<br \/>\nhappened to everybody okay you just<\/p>\n<p>696<br \/>\n00:32:03,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:08,410<br \/>\nstart doing this and hey things change<\/p>\n<p>697<br \/>\n00:32:06,160 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:14,020<br \/>\nlife change work changed travel change<\/p>\n<p>698<br \/>\n00:32:08,410 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:17,500<br \/>\neverything else change so but I but as<\/p>\n<p>699<br \/>\n00:32:14,020 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:20,470<br \/>\nwe have been or I be noticing on this<\/p>\n<p>700<br \/>\n00:32:17,500 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:23,170<br \/>\ndiscussion there is as you said not a<\/p>\n<p>701<br \/>\n00:32:20,470 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:28,770<br \/>\nclean cut not a clean answer are not a<\/p>\n<p>702<br \/>\n00:32:23,170 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:28,770<br \/>\nstraight path that then make me think on<\/p>\n<p>703<br \/>\n00:32:29,340 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:36,370<br \/>\nhow the level of frustration for the<\/p>\n<p>704<br \/>\n00:32:32,410 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:41,410<br \/>\npeople who is going through that okay<\/p>\n<p>705<br \/>\n00:32:36,370 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:44,800<br \/>\nwho not necessarily have the time or<\/p>\n<p>706<br \/>\n00:32:41,410 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:47,680<br \/>\nhave a span or have the passion to look<\/p>\n<p>707<br \/>\n00:32:44,800 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:50,290<br \/>\nand research and and look into the<\/p>\n<p>708<br \/>\n00:32:47,680 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:52,150<br \/>\nlittle details of all this they just<\/p>\n<p>709<br \/>\n00:32:50,290 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:54,190<br \/>\nneed something that work and will allow<\/p>\n<p>710<br \/>\n00:32:52,150 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:56,550<br \/>\nthem to move from the place they are<\/p>\n<p>711<br \/>\n00:32:54,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:59,500<br \/>\nstuck to the place they need to go and<\/p>\n<p>712<br \/>\n00:32:56,550 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:01,530<br \/>\nthat has been a really really<\/p>\n<p>713<br \/>\n00:32:59,500 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:05,610<br \/>\ninteresting sleep<\/p>\n<p>714<br \/>\n00:33:01,530 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:08,870<br \/>\nI think I could I see a I see a common<\/p>\n<p>715<br \/>\n00:33:05,610 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:13,080<br \/>\nproblem though the the challenge that<\/p>\n<p>716<br \/>\n00:33:08,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:17,490<br \/>\nthe individual always if the individual<\/p>\n<p>717<br \/>\n00:33:13,080 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:21,030<br \/>\nfaces is that what was what my habits<\/p>\n<p>718<br \/>\n00:33:17,490 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:26,760<br \/>\nmake the combination of habits practices<\/p>\n<p>719<br \/>\n00:33:21,030 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:29,940<br \/>\napps tools devices the little system I<\/p>\n<p>720<br \/>\n00:33:26,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:31,710<br \/>\nhave for myself has stopped working<\/p>\n<p>721<br \/>\n00:33:29,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:33,000<br \/>\nthere are symptoms that I&#8217;ve are showing<\/p>\n<p>722<br \/>\n00:33:31,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:35,160<br \/>\nup there and we used to experience<\/p>\n<p>723<br \/>\n00:33:33,000 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:38,070<br \/>\nbefore so let&#8217;s let&#8217;s say their unwanted<\/p>\n<p>724<br \/>\n00:33:35,160 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:41,790<br \/>\nsymptoms so everyone gets to that point<\/p>\n<p>725<br \/>\n00:33:38,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:44,730<br \/>\nat different times of their life some<\/p>\n<p>726<br \/>\n00:33:41,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:46,230<br \/>\npeople react by just cutting down the<\/p>\n<p>727<br \/>\n00:33:44,730 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:48,000<br \/>\nnumber of tasks and saying you know what<\/p>\n<p>728<br \/>\n00:33:46,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:49,950<br \/>\nI&#8217;ve had people tell me I don&#8217;t want to<\/p>\n<p>729<br \/>\n00:33:48,000 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:51,480<br \/>\nget promoted because I know I can&#8217;t<\/p>\n<p>730<br \/>\n00:33:49,950 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:54,510<br \/>\nhandle it so I just want to stay at the<\/p>\n<p>731<br \/>\n00:33:51,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:56,250<br \/>\nlevel I&#8217;m at until I retire so they&#8217;re<\/p>\n<p>732<br \/>\n00:33:54,510 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:58,620<br \/>\nessentially saying I don&#8217;t want life to<\/p>\n<p>733<br \/>\n00:33:56,250 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:00,330<br \/>\ngive me anymore triggers for me to<\/p>\n<p>734<br \/>\n00:33:58,620 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:02,880<br \/>\ncreate anymore tasks and I can currently<\/p>\n<p>735<br \/>\n00:34:00,330 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:04,950<br \/>\nmanage because I can&#8217;t manage the more<\/p>\n<p>736<br \/>\n00:34:02,880 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:09,060<br \/>\nthan the number that I have but most<\/p>\n<p>737<br \/>\n00:34:04,950 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:13,399<br \/>\npeople respond by by saying how do I get<\/p>\n<p>738<br \/>\n00:34:09,060 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:16,140<br \/>\nrid of these symptoms know that the<\/p>\n<p>739<br \/>\n00:34:13,399 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:18,270<br \/>\nshort answer is all you need to change<\/p>\n<p>740<br \/>\n00:34:16,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:20,340<br \/>\nthe combination of habits practices<\/p>\n<p>741<br \/>\n00:34:18,270 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:22,890<br \/>\ntools and apps that you&#8217;re currently<\/p>\n<p>742<br \/>\n00:34:20,340 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:26,100<br \/>\nusing I need to upgrade them accordingly<\/p>\n<p>743<br \/>\n00:34:22,890 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:27,540<br \/>\nso that you can manage more tasks and<\/p>\n<p>744<br \/>\n00:34:26,100 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:32,909<br \/>\nthereby get rid of these unwanted<\/p>\n<p>745<br \/>\n00:34:27,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:37,110<br \/>\nsymptoms the tougher question is which<\/p>\n<p>746<br \/>\n00:34:32,909 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:39,990<br \/>\nones do I change and I make sure those<\/p>\n<p>747<br \/>\n00:34:37,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:42,720<br \/>\nare the right ones for me to change but<\/p>\n<p>748<br \/>\n00:34:39,990 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:45,120<br \/>\nthe common problem is common even if<\/p>\n<p>749<br \/>\n00:34:42,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:47,429<br \/>\nyou&#8217;re whether you&#8217;re 12 years old or 50<\/p>\n<p>750<br \/>\n00:34:45,120 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:48,360<br \/>\nyears old whether you&#8217;re a CEO or an<\/p>\n<p>751<br \/>\n00:34:47,429 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:51,179<br \/>\nentry-level employee<\/p>\n<p>752<br \/>\n00:34:48,360 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:54,690<br \/>\nthe question is how do I change these<\/p>\n<p>753<br \/>\n00:34:51,179 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:56,310<br \/>\nthings that I use so that I can capture<\/p>\n<p>754<br \/>\n00:34:54,690 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:00,020<br \/>\nmore capacity and get rid of these<\/p>\n<p>755<br \/>\n00:34:56,310 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:03,180<br \/>\nsymptoms so I can move to the next level<\/p>\n<p>756<br \/>\n00:35:00,020 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:05,070<br \/>\nand I&#8217;ve focused a lot of times in my<\/p>\n<p>757<br \/>\n00:35:03,180 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:08,090<br \/>\nown sort of research and writing in<\/p>\n<p>758<br \/>\n00:35:05,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:11,490<br \/>\nfiguring out what that lateral skills<\/p>\n<p>759<br \/>\n00:35:08,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:14,160<br \/>\nneeds to look like as long as it&#8217;s only<\/p>\n<p>760<br \/>\n00:35:11,490 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:15,300<br \/>\nabout the tasks increasing not about the<\/p>\n<p>761<br \/>\n00:35:14,160 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:17,520<br \/>\nemotional pressure<\/p>\n<p>762<br \/>\n00:35:15,300 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:20,970<br \/>\nthe anxiety or any of that but if it&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>763<br \/>\n00:35:17,520 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:23,520<br \/>\njust about tasks increasing then there&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>764<br \/>\n00:35:20,970 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:27,030<br \/>\na ladder that we tend to climb as humans<\/p>\n<p>765<br \/>\n00:35:23,520 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:30,270<br \/>\nthat think it&#8217;s predictable the<\/p>\n<p>766<br \/>\n00:35:27,030 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:33,330<br \/>\nchallenge is that most people aren&#8217;t<\/p>\n<p>767<br \/>\n00:35:30,270 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:34,860<br \/>\naware that they are they have their own<\/p>\n<p>768<br \/>\n00:35:33,330 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:37,440<br \/>\nsystem most people aren&#8217;t aware that<\/p>\n<p>769<br \/>\n00:35:34,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:40,080<br \/>\nit&#8217;s made up of habits practices apps<\/p>\n<p>770<br \/>\n00:35:37,440 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:42,420<br \/>\ndevices tools most people aren&#8217;t aware<\/p>\n<p>771<br \/>\n00:35:40,080 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:45,300<br \/>\nthat there is a ladder and the need to<\/p>\n<p>772<br \/>\n00:35:42,420 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:46,740<br \/>\nupgrade most people aren&#8217;t aware of any<\/p>\n<p>773<br \/>\n00:35:45,300 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:49,110<br \/>\nof those elements and when they&#8217;re not<\/p>\n<p>774<br \/>\n00:35:46,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:50,940<br \/>\naware then it&#8217;s just a matter of chasing<\/p>\n<p>775<br \/>\n00:35:49,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:53,010<br \/>\ndown the latest blog post and that&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>776<br \/>\n00:35:50,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:56,370<br \/>\nwhen it gets really difficult for them<\/p>\n<p>777<br \/>\n00:35:53,010 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:00,060<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s sort of my take on it they don&#8217;t<\/p>\n<p>778<br \/>\n00:35:56,370 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:02,430<br \/>\nsee the common problem so let me ask a<\/p>\n<p>779<br \/>\n00:36:00,060 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:05,340<br \/>\nquestion then and I&#8217;ll go back to you<\/p>\n<p>780<br \/>\n00:36:02,430 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:08,480<br \/>\nAugusto and ask the question this way if<\/p>\n<p>781<br \/>\n00:36:05,340 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:11,640<br \/>\nsomebody came to you with this problem<\/p>\n<p>782<br \/>\n00:36:08,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:13,500<br \/>\nhow would you recommend to them that<\/p>\n<p>783<br \/>\n00:36:11,640 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:15,090<br \/>\nthey start to tackle it take yours take<\/p>\n<p>784<br \/>\n00:36:13,500 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:17,610<br \/>\nyourself out of your own shoes and look<\/p>\n<p>785<br \/>\n00:36:15,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:20,160<br \/>\nat it from the outside I don&#8217;t know a<\/p>\n<p>786<br \/>\n00:36:17,610 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:22,560<br \/>\ngusto system well enough to be able to<\/p>\n<p>787<br \/>\n00:36:20,160 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:25,500<br \/>\ntell him but I could suggest ways in<\/p>\n<p>788<br \/>\n00:36:22,560 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:28,320<br \/>\nwhich he could he could sort of measure<\/p>\n<p>789<br \/>\n00:36:25,500 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:30,750<br \/>\nthe unwanted symptoms the degree to<\/p>\n<p>790<br \/>\n00:36:28,320 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:33,630<br \/>\nwhich he has them and then figure out<\/p>\n<p>791<br \/>\n00:36:30,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:37,290<br \/>\nwhere he is on the basically of the<\/p>\n<p>792<br \/>\n00:36:33,630 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:39,900<br \/>\nladder and then make a choice as to what<\/p>\n<p>793<br \/>\n00:36:37,290 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:42,600<br \/>\nthe next rung on the ladder should be in<\/p>\n<p>794<br \/>\n00:36:39,900 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:46,020<br \/>\nterms of the tool<\/p>\n<p>795<br \/>\n00:36:42,600 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:47,430<br \/>\nhabit practice that combination so I&#8217;d<\/p>\n<p>796<br \/>\n00:36:46,020 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:49,710<br \/>\ngive him some kind of way to self<\/p>\n<p>797<br \/>\n00:36:47,430 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:52,140<br \/>\ndiagnose himself and then look at the<\/p>\n<p>798<br \/>\n00:36:49,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:55,590<br \/>\nnext level and then choose it or not<\/p>\n<p>799<br \/>\n00:36:52,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:58,260<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s that&#8217;s how I approach this<\/p>\n<p>800<br \/>\n00:36:55,590 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:02,820<br \/>\nproblem when it when it was identified<\/p>\n<p>801<br \/>\n00:36:58,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:06,300<br \/>\nfine then now it&#8217;s time that I sit<\/p>\n<p>802<br \/>\n00:37:02,820 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:08,910<br \/>\nmyself on the patient chair and look at<\/p>\n<p>803<br \/>\n00:37:06,300 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:12,690<br \/>\nit that&#8217;s was how there was a couple of<\/p>\n<p>804<br \/>\n00:37:08,910 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:15,720<br \/>\nthings one is what are the new<\/p>\n<p>805<br \/>\n00:37:12,690 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:18,930<br \/>\nconstraints that you can see because as<\/p>\n<p>806<br \/>\n00:37:15,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:20,850<br \/>\nmuch as we all will love to see all the<\/p>\n<p>807<br \/>\n00:37:18,930 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:25,380<br \/>\nconstraints with clarity that doesn&#8217;t<\/p>\n<p>808<br \/>\n00:37:20,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:27,510<br \/>\nmean it happens so now that you are<\/p>\n<p>809<br \/>\n00:37:25,380 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:29,190<br \/>\ngoing to be there so one is what are the<\/p>\n<p>810<br \/>\n00:37:27,510 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:32,549<br \/>\nconstraints second<\/p>\n<p>811<br \/>\n00:37:29,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:34,950<br \/>\nwhat are the times that has been changed<\/p>\n<p>812<br \/>\n00:37:32,549 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:37,589<br \/>\nso for example time in the office versus<\/p>\n<p>813<br \/>\n00:37:34,950 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:39,170<br \/>\ntime in the car now I&#8217;m spending a lot<\/p>\n<p>814<br \/>\n00:37:37,589 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:44,099<br \/>\nmore time in the car<\/p>\n<p>815<br \/>\n00:37:39,170 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:46,740<br \/>\ntherefore I need to make sure that if<\/p>\n<p>816<br \/>\n00:37:44,099 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:49,859<br \/>\nthere is anything that can be done<\/p>\n<p>817<br \/>\n00:37:46,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:53,160<br \/>\nproductively while I am in the car for<\/p>\n<p>818<br \/>\n00:37:49,859 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:56,670<br \/>\nexample making a phone call I have a<\/p>\n<p>819<br \/>\n00:37:53,160 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:00,240<br \/>\nclear and simple and complete access to<\/p>\n<p>820<br \/>\n00:37:56,670 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:05,220<br \/>\nbe able to get those phone calls or as<\/p>\n<p>821<br \/>\n00:38:00,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:08,520<br \/>\nmany of those as possible that bring you<\/p>\n<p>822<br \/>\n00:38:05,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:12,059<br \/>\nback even to equipment do I am am i<\/p>\n<p>823<br \/>\n00:38:08,520 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:15,230<br \/>\nequip enough to have a good phone<\/p>\n<p>824<br \/>\n00:38:12,059 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:17,700<br \/>\nconversation in the car because if you<\/p>\n<p>825<br \/>\n00:38:15,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:19,920<br \/>\nyou know nothing worse than half the<\/p>\n<p>826<br \/>\n00:38:17,700 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:21,930<br \/>\nconversation and then the person on the<\/p>\n<p>827<br \/>\n00:38:19,920 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:25,020<br \/>\nother side is hearing all the noise and<\/p>\n<p>828<br \/>\n00:38:21,930 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:29,849<br \/>\neverything else oh so all that things<\/p>\n<p>829<br \/>\n00:38:25,020 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:32,069<br \/>\ncome into play third is okay now if you<\/p>\n<p>830<br \/>\n00:38:29,849 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:33,299<br \/>\nare now into all these meetings that are<\/p>\n<p>831<br \/>\n00:38:32,069 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:35,640<br \/>\nthe end of their work and you&#8217;re<\/p>\n<p>832<br \/>\n00:38:33,299 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:40,069<br \/>\ntraveling and spending this amount in<\/p>\n<p>833<br \/>\n00:38:35,640 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:43,049<br \/>\nthe car how much time you have left<\/p>\n<p>834<br \/>\n00:38:40,069 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:45,750<br \/>\nbecause that is the other point if you<\/p>\n<p>835<br \/>\n00:38:43,049 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:49,650<br \/>\nare on the office environment where your<\/p>\n<p>836<br \/>\n00:38:45,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:52,619<br \/>\nsupply is pretty much unlimited and you<\/p>\n<p>837<br \/>\n00:38:49,650 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:55,680<br \/>\nare now not well then that is and the<\/p>\n<p>838<br \/>\n00:38:52,619 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:59,279<br \/>\nother element is how fast are you<\/p>\n<p>839<br \/>\n00:38:55,680 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:02,910<br \/>\nconsuming energy and how can you<\/p>\n<p>840<br \/>\n00:38:59,279 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:05,369<br \/>\nreplenish that in a faster way and what<\/p>\n<p>841<br \/>\n00:39:02,910 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:10,910<br \/>\nI mean with that is when you are again<\/p>\n<p>842<br \/>\n00:39:05,369 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:15,869<br \/>\nin the office most of the time you can<\/p>\n<p>843<br \/>\n00:39:10,910 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:18,510<br \/>\nmanage how much energy you are consuming<\/p>\n<p>844<br \/>\n00:39:15,869 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:21,029<br \/>\nwhen you are now meeting to meeting<\/p>\n<p>845<br \/>\n00:39:18,510 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:22,890<br \/>\nagain in the car drive an hour go to two<\/p>\n<p>846<br \/>\n00:39:21,029 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:24,680<br \/>\nmeetings to get in the car drive another<\/p>\n<p>847<br \/>\n00:39:22,890 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:28,980<br \/>\nhour go to a meeting<\/p>\n<p>848<br \/>\n00:39:24,680 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:32,609<br \/>\nit gets more challenging to manage<\/p>\n<p>849<br \/>\n00:39:28,980 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:35,730<br \/>\nenergy mostly even in the best of your<\/p>\n<p>850<br \/>\n00:39:32,609 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:40,109<br \/>\nabilities you are now running almost all<\/p>\n<p>851<br \/>\n00:39:35,730 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:42,840<br \/>\nthe time that said there are things you<\/p>\n<p>852<br \/>\n00:39:40,109 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:46,830<br \/>\ncan do to try to slow the<\/p>\n<p>853<br \/>\n00:39:42,840 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:49,380<br \/>\nto try to recover energy and and to<\/p>\n<p>854<br \/>\n00:39:46,830 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:53,870<br \/>\ncontinue doing some of the good stuff<\/p>\n<p>855<br \/>\n00:39:49,380 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:56,850<br \/>\nyou used to do before so at this<\/p>\n<p>856<br \/>\n00:39:53,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:59,760<br \/>\nparticular point for me has been a more<\/p>\n<p>857<br \/>\n00:39:56,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:01,560<br \/>\nexploratory process than a solution<\/p>\n<p>858<br \/>\n00:39:59,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:04,110<br \/>\nhence the reason I wanted to make this<\/p>\n<p>859<br \/>\n00:40:01,560 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:08,580<br \/>\ncall to see if there was a clear answer<\/p>\n<p>860<br \/>\n00:40:04,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:11,280<br \/>\nor element that I was missing on the<\/p>\n<p>861<br \/>\n00:40:08,580 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:16,350<br \/>\nassessment I was doing interestingly<\/p>\n<p>862<br \/>\n00:40:11,280 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:20,120<br \/>\nenough it wasn&#8217;t it seems that part of<\/p>\n<p>863<br \/>\n00:40:16,350 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:24,000<br \/>\nthe answer it&#8217;s more complicated than<\/p>\n<p>864<br \/>\n00:40:20,120 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:25,320<br \/>\nthan the simple I seems to show I wanted<\/p>\n<p>865<br \/>\n00:40:24,000 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:27,990<br \/>\nto spend a little bit of time here just<\/p>\n<p>866<br \/>\n00:40:25,320 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:29,400<br \/>\ndoubling back on the part of the<\/p>\n<p>867<br \/>\n00:40:27,990 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:33,060<br \/>\ndiscussion we were talking about with<\/p>\n<p>868<br \/>\n00:40:29,400 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:35,880<br \/>\nregard to how to identify when it&#8217;s time<\/p>\n<p>869<br \/>\n00:40:33,060 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:37,920<br \/>\nto actually look at your system to<\/p>\n<p>870<br \/>\n00:40:35,880 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:40,620<br \/>\nidentify whether or not you&#8217;re creating<\/p>\n<p>871<br \/>\n00:40:37,920 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:44,660<br \/>\nthe right next actions appropriate to<\/p>\n<p>872<br \/>\n00:40:40,620 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:48,210<br \/>\nthe new potential contexts of your life<\/p>\n<p>873<br \/>\n00:40:44,660 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:49,680<br \/>\ncontext being not in just GTD context<\/p>\n<p>874<br \/>\n00:40:48,210 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:52,020<br \/>\nbut really you know what&#8217;s happening<\/p>\n<p>875<br \/>\n00:40:49,680 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:54,150<br \/>\nwhat&#8217;s the circumstance of life and so<\/p>\n<p>876<br \/>\n00:40:52,020 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:57,570<br \/>\nthere is in psychology something called<\/p>\n<p>877<br \/>\n00:40:54,150 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:58,590<br \/>\nthe Holmes ray life stress inventory and<\/p>\n<p>878<br \/>\n00:40:57,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:02,550<br \/>\nI&#8217;ll put a link to this in the show<\/p>\n<p>879<br \/>\n00:40:58,590 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:06,720<br \/>\nnotes and what it does is it uses 43<\/p>\n<p>880<br \/>\n00:41:02,550 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:10,020<br \/>\ndifferent units to identify whether or<\/p>\n<p>881<br \/>\n00:41:06,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:12,360<br \/>\nnot you are having major life stress or<\/p>\n<p>882<br \/>\n00:41:10,020 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:14,730<br \/>\nnot and it uses a point scale and so and<\/p>\n<p>883<br \/>\n00:41:12,360 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:16,170<br \/>\nso forth that that&#8217;s really used for<\/p>\n<p>884<br \/>\n00:41:14,730 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:18,810<br \/>\nwhether or not you&#8217;re going to have a<\/p>\n<p>885<br \/>\n00:41:16,170 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:22,170<br \/>\nmental or physical health breakdown<\/p>\n<p>886<br \/>\n00:41:18,810 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:23,790<br \/>\nright some level of trauma happening in<\/p>\n<p>887<br \/>\n00:41:22,170 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:27,360<br \/>\nyour life and therefore you need to<\/p>\n<p>888<br \/>\n00:41:23,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:29,190<br \/>\naddress that health risk I like to look<\/p>\n<p>889<br \/>\n00:41:27,360 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:31,650<br \/>\nat it from the perspective that those<\/p>\n<p>890<br \/>\n00:41:29,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:34,860<br \/>\nare opportunities whenever any of those<\/p>\n<p>891<br \/>\n00:41:31,650 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:36,750<br \/>\nthings happen to assess your system is<\/p>\n<p>892<br \/>\n00:41:34,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:38,640<br \/>\nmy system appropriate to the<\/p>\n<p>893<br \/>\n00:41:36,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:41,610<br \/>\ncircumstances of life right now in life<\/p>\n<p>894<br \/>\n00:41:38,640 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:44,370<br \/>\nand work and so I have just 15<\/p>\n<p>895<br \/>\n00:41:41,610 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:46,050<br \/>\ncategories that cover these things and<\/p>\n<p>896<br \/>\n00:41:44,370 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:47,370<br \/>\nI&#8217;ll put I&#8217;ll put I&#8217;ll copy these into<\/p>\n<p>897<br \/>\n00:41:46,050 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:48,630<br \/>\nthe show notes so you have them but I<\/p>\n<p>898<br \/>\n00:41:47,370 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:51,450<br \/>\njust wanted to list them off here really<\/p>\n<p>899<br \/>\n00:41:48,630 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:53,460<br \/>\nquickly so people are aware of them the<\/p>\n<p>900<br \/>\n00:41:51,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:54,930<br \/>\nfirst one is birth second is death so<\/p>\n<p>901<br \/>\n00:41:53,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:55,410<br \/>\nwhen if you have a birth or death in the<\/p>\n<p>902<br \/>\n00:41:54,930 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:56,730<br \/>\nfamily<\/p>\n<p>903<br \/>\n00:41:55,410 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:58,500<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s really a time to<\/p>\n<p>904<br \/>\n00:41:56,730 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:00,750<br \/>\ntake assessment to whether or not you<\/p>\n<p>905<br \/>\n00:41:58,500 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:03,440<br \/>\nhave prioritized the right things but<\/p>\n<p>906<br \/>\n00:42:00,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:06,240<br \/>\nalso are you setting up actions<\/p>\n<p>907<br \/>\n00:42:03,440 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:07,140<br \/>\nappropriate to the time now you have<\/p>\n<p>908<br \/>\n00:42:06,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:09,210<br \/>\navailable to you<\/p>\n<p>909<br \/>\n00:42:07,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:12,900<br \/>\nprofessional transitions and those<\/p>\n<p>910<br \/>\n00:42:09,210 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:15,510<br \/>\ninclude demotion promotion higher being<\/p>\n<p>911<br \/>\n00:42:12,900 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:18,710<br \/>\nhired being terminated in some way shape<\/p>\n<p>912<br \/>\n00:42:15,510 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:21,720<br \/>\nor form whether involuntary or by choice<\/p>\n<p>913<br \/>\n00:42:18,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:23,190<br \/>\nchanges in in careers that is switching<\/p>\n<p>914<br \/>\n00:42:21,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:26,880<br \/>\nin transitioning from one career to<\/p>\n<p>915<br \/>\n00:42:23,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:30,350<br \/>\nanother starting school first job moving<\/p>\n<p>916<br \/>\n00:42:26,880 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:33,210<br \/>\nhome moving offices downsizing homes<\/p>\n<p>917<br \/>\n00:42:30,350 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:35,610<br \/>\nstarting retirement for some people<\/p>\n<p>918<br \/>\n00:42:33,210 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:37,860<br \/>\nmarriage or some type of long term<\/p>\n<p>919<br \/>\n00:42:35,610 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:40,200<br \/>\ncommitment has been engaged and then<\/p>\n<p>920<br \/>\n00:42:37,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:41,880<br \/>\nanytime of long long term commitment<\/p>\n<p>921<br \/>\n00:42:40,200 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:43,410<br \/>\nends whether that be through divorce<\/p>\n<p>922<br \/>\n00:42:41,880 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:45,660<br \/>\nseparation or ending a long term<\/p>\n<p>923<br \/>\n00:42:43,410 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:48,030<br \/>\nrelationship so those are the 15 of them<\/p>\n<p>924<br \/>\n00:42:45,660 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:50,430<br \/>\nthat really are the the questions I<\/p>\n<p>925<br \/>\n00:42:48,030 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:52,650<br \/>\nactually ask clients all the time you<\/p>\n<p>926<br \/>\n00:42:50,430 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:56,850<br \/>\nknow oh if they&#8217;re if they&#8217;re<\/p>\n<p>927<br \/>\n00:42:52,650 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:59,640<br \/>\nexperiencing some level of trauma to say<\/p>\n<p>928<br \/>\n00:42:56,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:01,230<br \/>\nhey that is trauma to their productivity<\/p>\n<p>929<br \/>\n00:42:59,640 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:03,780<br \/>\nsystem not necessarily mental emotional<\/p>\n<p>930<br \/>\n00:43:01,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:06,690<br \/>\ntrauma but are these major life events<\/p>\n<p>931<br \/>\n00:43:03,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:11,790<br \/>\nhappening and if they are then we need<\/p>\n<p>932<br \/>\n00:43:06,690 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:14,940<br \/>\nto reassess the system Frances those are<\/p>\n<p>933<br \/>\n00:43:11,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:16,310<br \/>\nreally cool I&#8217;ll share the share my high<\/p>\n<p>934<br \/>\n00:43:14,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:18,840<br \/>\ncliff there in the show notes as well<\/p>\n<p>935<br \/>\n00:43:16,310 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:20,760<br \/>\nfor these things by the time the stroke<\/p>\n<p>936<br \/>\n00:43:18,840 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:24,360<br \/>\nactually comes out but I could share<\/p>\n<p>937<br \/>\n00:43:20,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:25,830<br \/>\nsome of the others that I looked at how<\/p>\n<p>938<br \/>\n00:43:24,360 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:27,930<br \/>\noften do you wish you had more spare<\/p>\n<p>939<br \/>\n00:43:25,830 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:32,280<br \/>\ntime you know how often does the thought<\/p>\n<p>940<br \/>\n00:43:27,930 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:34,560<br \/>\ncome up do you run late for meetings and<\/p>\n<p>941<br \/>\n00:43:32,280 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:38,340<br \/>\nappointments it&#8217;s sort of a basic one<\/p>\n<p>942<br \/>\n00:43:34,560 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:39,750<br \/>\nare you meeting your due dates do you<\/p>\n<p>943<br \/>\n00:43:38,340 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:41,460<br \/>\nhave a good reputation or has your<\/p>\n<p>944<br \/>\n00:43:39,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:42,990<br \/>\nreputation been suffering lately for<\/p>\n<p>945<br \/>\n00:43:41,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:45,810<br \/>\nbeing and delivering on time are you<\/p>\n<p>946<br \/>\n00:43:42,990 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:49,140<br \/>\ntelling you that you have a problem<\/p>\n<p>947<br \/>\n00:43:45,810 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:51,510<br \/>\nI also added on something about space<\/p>\n<p>948<br \/>\n00:43:49,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:54,590<br \/>\nand seeing my personal space has piles<\/p>\n<p>949<br \/>\n00:43:51,510 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:57,960<br \/>\nso I can&#8217;t find stuff when I need it is<\/p>\n<p>950<br \/>\n00:43:54,590 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:04,290<br \/>\nthat a factor or is that has that<\/p>\n<p>951<br \/>\n00:43:57,960 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:06,240<br \/>\nincreased lately and then that may be<\/p>\n<p>952<br \/>\n00:44:04,290 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:07,860<br \/>\nthe last last one I&#8217;ll sure here is I&#8217;m<\/p>\n<p>953<br \/>\n00:44:06,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:09,339<br \/>\nawakened in the middle of the night by<\/p>\n<p>954<br \/>\n00:44:07,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:13,089<br \/>\nthe thought of a task I<\/p>\n<p>955<br \/>\n00:44:09,339 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:15,729<br \/>\nwhat about a sort of a jumping out of<\/p>\n<p>956<br \/>\n00:44:13,089 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:17,979<br \/>\nyour sleep in a panic wondering if and<\/p>\n<p>957<br \/>\n00:44:15,729 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:19,989<br \/>\nif that happens that&#8217;s a probably not a<\/p>\n<p>958<br \/>\n00:44:17,979 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:24,460<br \/>\ngood idea that a good indicator that<\/p>\n<p>959<br \/>\n00:44:19,989 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:28,200<br \/>\nit&#8217;s time to look at your your blend of<\/p>\n<p>960<br \/>\n00:44:24,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:30,969<br \/>\npractices habits tools and apps<\/p>\n<p>961<br \/>\n00:44:28,200 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:33,910<br \/>\nremarkably I&#8217;ve never been awakened by<\/p>\n<p>962<br \/>\n00:44:30,969 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:35,799<br \/>\nmy own thoughts in sleep I I&#8217;m I&#8217;m a<\/p>\n<p>963<br \/>\n00:44:33,910 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:38,499<br \/>\nfairly light and sensitive sleeper so<\/p>\n<p>964<br \/>\n00:44:35,799 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:41,369<br \/>\nI&#8217;m lookin by many different things<\/p>\n<p>965<br \/>\n00:44:38,499 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:43,450<br \/>\nmaybe they sound or light you know<\/p>\n<p>966<br \/>\n00:44:41,369 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:46,539<br \/>\nthings happening in my certain<\/p>\n<p>967<br \/>\n00:44:43,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:56,099<br \/>\nenvironment but I am a sound sleeper<\/p>\n<p>968<br \/>\n00:44:46,539 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:59,289<br \/>\notherwise you&#8217;ve been spared system I<\/p>\n<p>969<br \/>\n00:44:56,099 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:03,099<br \/>\nthink in a situation yeah in a situation<\/p>\n<p>970<br \/>\n00:44:59,289 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:05,469<br \/>\nlike this one more information is needed<\/p>\n<p>971<br \/>\n00:45:03,099 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:08,619<br \/>\nbefore decisions start getting made as<\/p>\n<p>972<br \/>\n00:45:05,469 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:12,009<br \/>\nto how to make changes so my<\/p>\n<p>973<br \/>\n00:45:08,619 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:15,759<br \/>\nrecommendation to you Augusto is to take<\/p>\n<p>974<br \/>\n00:45:12,009 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:18,579<br \/>\na deeper dive into what&#8217;s not working<\/p>\n<p>975<br \/>\n00:45:15,759 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:21,549<br \/>\nwhat&#8217;s failing what&#8217;s what is causing<\/p>\n<p>976<br \/>\n00:45:18,579 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:23,440<br \/>\nstress Nadja to try to isolate those<\/p>\n<p>977<br \/>\n00:45:21,549 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:25,660<br \/>\nitems and then tackle those because<\/p>\n<p>978<br \/>\n00:45:23,440 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:28,599<br \/>\nright now this sounds like a really big<\/p>\n<p>979<br \/>\n00:45:25,660 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:31,210<br \/>\npizza to eat and you need to get it down<\/p>\n<p>980<br \/>\n00:45:28,599 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:33,900<br \/>\ninto some smaller slices agree and I I<\/p>\n<p>981<br \/>\n00:45:31,210 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:38,259<br \/>\nthink there are many people most people<\/p>\n<p>982<br \/>\n00:45:33,900 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:41,440<br \/>\nwho struggle in the same way especially<\/p>\n<p>983<br \/>\n00:45:38,259 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:44,469<br \/>\npeople who have a sort of productivity<\/p>\n<p>984<br \/>\n00:45:41,440 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:47,170<br \/>\nsmart because they can&#8217;t understand why<\/p>\n<p>985<br \/>\n00:45:44,469 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:50,109<br \/>\nthe system they have put together all of<\/p>\n<p>986<br \/>\n00:45:47,170 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:52,269<br \/>\na sudden doesn&#8217;t work and it&#8217;s not it<\/p>\n<p>987<br \/>\n00:45:50,109 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:55,299<br \/>\noften times they try to work their<\/p>\n<p>988<br \/>\n00:45:52,269 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:57,549<br \/>\nsystem even harder or they try to follow<\/p>\n<p>989<br \/>\n00:45:55,299 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:00,430<br \/>\ntheir same approach with more rigor or<\/p>\n<p>990<br \/>\n00:45:57,549 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:03,279<br \/>\nmore discipline or more energy or more<\/p>\n<p>991<br \/>\n00:46:00,430 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:05,920<br \/>\nsomething and it&#8217;s frustrating when that<\/p>\n<p>992<br \/>\n00:46:03,279 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:08,140<br \/>\ndoesn&#8217;t work and they they&#8217;re not able<\/p>\n<p>993<br \/>\n00:46:05,920 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:10,599<br \/>\nto see the far bigger pickles that it<\/p>\n<p>994<br \/>\n00:46:08,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:12,549<br \/>\nhas to do with capacity and capacity is<\/p>\n<p>995<br \/>\n00:46:10,599 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:15,099<br \/>\nno respecter of the system that you use<\/p>\n<p>996<br \/>\n00:46:12,549 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:17,049<br \/>\nat some point we all want the capacity<\/p>\n<p>997<br \/>\n00:46:15,099 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:19,900<br \/>\njust because we keep creating more tasks<\/p>\n<p>998<br \/>\n00:46:17,049 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:22,540<br \/>\nso it&#8217;s almost like an inevitable must<\/p>\n<p>999<br \/>\n00:46:19,900 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:25,120<br \/>\nhappen in the life of all of us<\/p>\n<p>1000<br \/>\n00:46:22,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:27,790<br \/>\nquestion is where can they find the<\/p>\n<p>1001<br \/>\n00:46:25,120 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:31,180<br \/>\ntargeted support that goes beyond the<\/p>\n<p>1002<br \/>\n00:46:27,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:32,980<br \/>\ntop 10 list or here read this book and I<\/p>\n<p>1003<br \/>\n00:46:31,180 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:35,320<br \/>\nthink it the safe diagnosis is a<\/p>\n<p>1004<br \/>\n00:46:32,980 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:39,130<br \/>\nself-evaluation the critical part of<\/p>\n<p>1005<br \/>\n00:46:35,320 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:41,770<br \/>\nthat well I for one know I don&#8217;t have a<\/p>\n<p>1006<br \/>\n00:46:39,130 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:44,020<br \/>\ndefinite answer to the problem but I&#8217;m<\/p>\n<p>1007<br \/>\n00:46:41,770 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:47,220<br \/>\nreally happy of the discussion because<\/p>\n<p>1008<br \/>\n00:46:44,020 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:51,120<br \/>\none of the things that has been<\/p>\n<p>1009<br \/>\n00:46:47,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:54,070<br \/>\nfrustrating to a point is how many<\/p>\n<p>1010<br \/>\n00:46:51,120 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:56,830<br \/>\ndirections this problem seems to turn<\/p>\n<p>1011<br \/>\n00:46:54,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:59,020<br \/>\nand how many heads it shows you know in<\/p>\n<p>1012<br \/>\n00:46:56,830 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:01,090<br \/>\na way it&#8217;s like fighting with a Hydra<\/p>\n<p>1013<br \/>\n00:46:59,020 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:03,040<br \/>\nyou know just cut two heads it&#8217;s a great<\/p>\n<p>1014<br \/>\n00:47:01,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:05,950<br \/>\nI&#8217;m moving forward suddenly and you now<\/p>\n<p>1015<br \/>\n00:47:03,040 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:08,410<br \/>\nhave four heads in front of you like<\/p>\n<p>1016<br \/>\n00:47:05,950 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:11,590<br \/>\ngroups if this is not going at the<\/p>\n<p>1017<br \/>\n00:47:08,410 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:13,780<br \/>\ndirection I was planning but the<\/p>\n<p>1018<br \/>\n00:47:11,590 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:17,260<br \/>\ndiscussion shows that it&#8217;s not<\/p>\n<p>1019<br \/>\n00:47:13,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:21,040<br \/>\nnecessarily a single cut answer and it<\/p>\n<p>1020<br \/>\n00:47:17,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:24,030<br \/>\nmay require even going to a more basic<\/p>\n<p>1021<br \/>\n00:47:21,040 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:26,770<br \/>\nlevel than what I originally thought<\/p>\n<p>1022<br \/>\n00:47:24,030 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:29,380<br \/>\nwell gentlemen this brings us to the end<\/p>\n<p>1023<br \/>\n00:47:26,770 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:31,180<br \/>\nof this episode of productivity cast the<\/p>\n<p>1024<br \/>\n00:47:29,380 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:32,620<br \/>\nweekly show about all things personal<\/p>\n<p>1025<br \/>\n00:47:31,180 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:35,110<br \/>\nproductivity I want to thank you all for<\/p>\n<p>1026<br \/>\n00:47:32,620 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:37,690<br \/>\nalways joining us here for this<\/p>\n<p>1027<br \/>\n00:47:35,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:40,510<br \/>\nproductivity cast if you are listeners<\/p>\n<p>1028<br \/>\n00:47:37,690 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:43,180<br \/>\nhave questions or comments please go to<\/p>\n<p>1029<br \/>\n00:47:40,510 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:45,520<br \/>\nproductivity cast net forward slash<\/p>\n<p>1030<br \/>\n00:47:43,180 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:47,950<br \/>\ncontact and leave us a message you can<\/p>\n<p>1031<br \/>\n00:47:45,520 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:51,550<br \/>\nrecord an audio message and potentially<\/p>\n<p>1032<br \/>\n00:47:47,950 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:54,400<br \/>\nbe here on the show with us and\/or write<\/p>\n<p>1033<br \/>\n00:47:51,550 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:55,990<br \/>\na message and hit submit and we will try<\/p>\n<p>1034<br \/>\n00:47:54,400 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:59,710<br \/>\nto answer your question either here on<\/p>\n<p>1035<br \/>\n00:47:55,990 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:01,240<br \/>\nair or in and via messaging back and<\/p>\n<p>1036<br \/>\n00:47:59,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:03,370<br \/>\nforth so feel free to go to practically<\/p>\n<p>1037<br \/>\n00:48:01,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:06,070<br \/>\ncast net forward slash contact and let<\/p>\n<p>1038<br \/>\n00:48:03,370 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:07,960<br \/>\nus know also please feel free to rate us<\/p>\n<p>1039<br \/>\n00:48:06,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:10,090<br \/>\non iTunes or your favorite podcast<\/p>\n<p>1040<br \/>\n00:48:07,960 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:12,850<br \/>\ndirectory wherever you access<\/p>\n<p>1041<br \/>\n00:48:10,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:15,790<br \/>\nproductivity cast please do rate us that<\/p>\n<p>1042<br \/>\n00:48:12,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:18,070<br \/>\nhelps to broaden our reach and therefore<\/p>\n<p>1043<br \/>\n00:48:15,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:21,550<br \/>\nexpand the productivity cast community<\/p>\n<p>1044<br \/>\n00:48:18,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:24,430<br \/>\nand we want to spread this far and wide<\/p>\n<p>1045<br \/>\n00:48:21,550 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:26,530<br \/>\nand bring more people to it so please do<\/p>\n<p>1046<br \/>\n00:48:24,430 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:28,270<br \/>\nthat and as well you can feel free to<\/p>\n<p>1047<br \/>\n00:48:26,530 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:30,010<br \/>\nshare your episode your favorite episode<\/p>\n<p>1048<br \/>\n00:48:28,270 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:32,050<br \/>\nof productivity casts so far feel free<\/p>\n<p>1049<br \/>\n00:48:30,010 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:34,480<br \/>\nto share that on social media and I&#8217;ll<\/p>\n<p>1050<br \/>\n00:48:32,050 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:35,770<br \/>\nlet us know why that episode meant as<\/p>\n<p>1051<br \/>\n00:48:34,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:36,140<br \/>\nmuch as it did to you that would be<\/p>\n<p>1052<br \/>\n00:48:35,770 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:38,000<br \/>\nreally<\/p>\n<p>1053<br \/>\n00:48:36,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:40,850<br \/>\nfor us to know we really appreciate and<\/p>\n<p>1054<br \/>\n00:48:38,000 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:43,310<br \/>\nenjoy the feedback finally thanks to<\/p>\n<p>1055<br \/>\n00:48:40,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:45,410<br \/>\nAugusto panade Frances Wade and art<\/p>\n<p>1056<br \/>\n00:48:43,310 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:47,420<br \/>\nGalax welcome thank you gentlemen for<\/p>\n<p>1057<br \/>\n00:48:45,410 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:51,470<br \/>\nbeing on productivity cast with me today<\/p>\n<p>1058<br \/>\n00:48:47,420 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:53,330<br \/>\nalways a pleasure thank you welcome<\/p>\n<p>1059<br \/>\n00:48:51,470 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:55,370<br \/>\nhere&#8217;s your productive life everybody<\/p>\n<p>1060<br \/>\n00:48:53,330 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:57,680<br \/>\ntake care that&#8217;s it for this<\/p>\n<p>1061<br \/>\n00:48:55,370 &#8211;&gt; 00:49:00,110<br \/>\nproductivity cast the weekly show about<\/p>\n<p>1062<br \/>\n00:48:57,680 &#8211;&gt; 00:49:02,150<br \/>\nall things productivity with your hosts<\/p>\n<p>1063<br \/>\n00:49:00,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:49:06,310<br \/>\nray Sydney Smith and Augusto pan out<\/p>\n<p>1064<br \/>\n00:49:02,150 &#8211;&gt; 00:49:06,310<br \/>\nwith Francis Wade and art Galax<\/p>\n<p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>25 episodes! Thank you all for listening and helping us grow the ProductivityCast community! As we grow and change in<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":257,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[119,118,3],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>025 How Next-Action Thinking Changes Over Time - ProductivityCast - ProductivityCast<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"025 How Next-Action Thinking Changes Over Time - ProductivityCast - ProductivityCast\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"25 episodes! Thank you all for listening and helping us grow the ProductivityCast community! As we grow and change in\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"ProductivityCast\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/productivitycast\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-03-08T13:00:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-03-05T23:20:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/03\/025-How-Next-Action-Thinking-Changes-Over-Time-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ray Sidney-Smith\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@rsidneysmith\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@prodcastshow\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ray Sidney-Smith\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"52 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ray Sidney-Smith\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/person\/226872a6bbe4c89226050740b276da08\"},\"headline\":\"025 How Next-Action Thinking Changes Over Time &#8211; ProductivityCast\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-03-08T13:00:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-05T23:20:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/\"},\"wordCount\":10617,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/03\/025-How-Next-Action-Thinking-Changes-Over-Time-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png\",\"keywords\":[\"How Next-Action Thinking Changes Over Time\",\"next-action\",\"productivity\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Casts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/\",\"name\":\"025 How Next-Action Thinking Changes Over Time - ProductivityCast - ProductivityCast\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/03\/025-How-Next-Action-Thinking-Changes-Over-Time-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-03-08T13:00:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-05T23:20:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/03\/025-How-Next-Action-Thinking-Changes-Over-Time-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/03\/025-How-Next-Action-Thinking-Changes-Over-Time-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png\",\"width\":1400,\"height\":1400,\"caption\":\"How Next-Action Thinking Changes Over Time - ProductivityCast\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"025 How Next-Action Thinking Changes Over Time &#8211; ProductivityCast\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/\",\"name\":\"ProductivityCast\",\"description\":\"The weekly show about all things productivity\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#organization\",\"name\":\"ProductivityCast\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2022\/03\/ProductivityCast-Logo-with-tagline.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2022\/03\/ProductivityCast-Logo-with-tagline.png\",\"width\":2800,\"height\":2800,\"caption\":\"ProductivityCast\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/productivitycast\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/prodcastshow\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/person\/226872a6bbe4c89226050740b276da08\",\"name\":\"Ray Sidney-Smith\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e78862bcd2eacbab8c97b6703db853f6?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e78862bcd2eacbab8c97b6703db853f6?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ray Sidney-Smith\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/rsidneysmith.com\",\"https:\/\/instagram.com\/focusatworkco\",\"https:\/\/linkedin.com\/in\/raymond\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/rsidneysmith\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"025 How Next-Action Thinking Changes Over Time - ProductivityCast - ProductivityCast","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"025 How Next-Action Thinking Changes Over Time - ProductivityCast - ProductivityCast","og_description":"25 episodes! Thank you all for listening and helping us grow the ProductivityCast community! As we grow and change in","og_url":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/","og_site_name":"ProductivityCast","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/productivitycast","article_published_time":"2018-03-08T13:00:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-03-05T23:20:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1400,"height":1400,"url":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/03\/025-How-Next-Action-Thinking-Changes-Over-Time-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Ray Sidney-Smith","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@rsidneysmith","twitter_site":"@prodcastshow","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ray Sidney-Smith","Est. reading time":"52 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/"},"author":{"name":"Ray Sidney-Smith","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/person\/226872a6bbe4c89226050740b276da08"},"headline":"025 How Next-Action Thinking Changes Over Time &#8211; ProductivityCast","datePublished":"2018-03-08T13:00:54+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-05T23:20:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/"},"wordCount":10617,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/03\/025-How-Next-Action-Thinking-Changes-Over-Time-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png","keywords":["How Next-Action Thinking Changes Over Time","next-action","productivity"],"articleSection":["Casts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/","url":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/","name":"025 How Next-Action Thinking Changes Over Time - ProductivityCast - ProductivityCast","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/03\/025-How-Next-Action-Thinking-Changes-Over-Time-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png","datePublished":"2018-03-08T13:00:54+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-05T23:20:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/03\/025-How-Next-Action-Thinking-Changes-Over-Time-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/03\/025-How-Next-Action-Thinking-Changes-Over-Time-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png","width":1400,"height":1400,"caption":"How Next-Action Thinking Changes Over Time - ProductivityCast"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/025-next-action-thinking-changes-time-productivitycast\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"025 How Next-Action Thinking Changes Over Time &#8211; ProductivityCast"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#website","url":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/","name":"ProductivityCast","description":"The weekly show about all things productivity","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#organization","name":"ProductivityCast","url":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2022\/03\/ProductivityCast-Logo-with-tagline.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2022\/03\/ProductivityCast-Logo-with-tagline.png","width":2800,"height":2800,"caption":"ProductivityCast"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/productivitycast","https:\/\/x.com\/prodcastshow"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/person\/226872a6bbe4c89226050740b276da08","name":"Ray Sidney-Smith","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e78862bcd2eacbab8c97b6703db853f6?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e78862bcd2eacbab8c97b6703db853f6?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ray Sidney-Smith"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/rsidneysmith.com","https:\/\/instagram.com\/focusatworkco","https:\/\/linkedin.com\/in\/raymond","https:\/\/x.com\/rsidneysmith"],"url":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=256"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/257"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=256"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=256"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=256"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}