{"id":288,"date":"2018-05-10T08:30:14","date_gmt":"2018-05-10T12:30:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/productivitycast.net\/?p=288"},"modified":"2018-05-06T10:17:32","modified_gmt":"2018-05-06T14:17:32","slug":"029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/","title":{"rendered":"029 Inbox Zero, Inbox One, and Processing Email Messages &#8211; ProductivityCast"},"content":{"rendered":"<div itemscope itemtype=\"http:\/\/schema.org\/AudioObject\"><meta itemprop=\"name\" content=\"029 Inbox Zero, Inbox One, and Processing Email Messages &amp;#8211; ProductivityCast\" \/><meta itemprop=\"uploadDate\" content=\"2018-05-10T08:30:14-04:00\" \/><meta itemprop=\"encodingFormat\" content=\"audio\/mpeg\" \/><meta itemprop=\"duration\" content=\"PT48M24S\" \/><meta itemprop=\"description\" content=\"As we discussed email in the last episode, email management of multiple accounts has its positives and negatives. All of us, Augusto, Art, Francis and I have multiple email accounts. And, to be honest, I don\u2019t know many people who have only one solit...\" \/><meta itemprop=\"contentUrl\" content=\"https:\/\/media.blubrry.com\/productivitycast\/content.blubrry.com\/productivitycast\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-processing-email-messages-productivitycast.mp3\" \/><meta itemprop=\"contentSize\" content=\"44.4\" \/><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/player.blubrry.com\/?media_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.blubrry.com%2Fproductivitycast%2Fcontent.blubrry.com%2Fproductivitycast%2F029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-processing-email-messages-productivitycast.mp3&amp;podcast_link=https%3A%2F%2Fproductivitycast.net%2F029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast%2F\" scrolling=\"no\" width=\"100%\" height=\"165\" frameborder=\"0\" id=\"blubrryplayer-1\" class=\"blubrryplayer\" title=\"Blubrry Podcast Player\"><\/iframe><\/div><p class=\"powerpress_links powerpress_links_mp3\" style=\"margin-bottom: 1px !important;\">Podcast: <a href=\"https:\/\/media.blubrry.com\/productivitycast\/content.blubrry.com\/productivitycast\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-processing-email-messages-productivitycast.mp3\" class=\"powerpress_link_pinw\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Play in new window\" onclick=\"return powerpress_pinw('https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/?powerpress_pinw=288-podcast');\" rel=\"nofollow\">Play in new window<\/a> | <a href=\"https:\/\/media.blubrry.com\/productivitycast\/content.blubrry.com\/productivitycast\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-processing-email-messages-productivitycast.mp3\" class=\"powerpress_link_d\" title=\"Download\" rel=\"nofollow\" download=\"029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-processing-email-messages-productivitycast.mp3\">Download<\/a> | <a href=\"#\" class=\"powerpress_link_e\" title=\"Embed\" onclick=\"return powerpress_show_embed('288-podcast');\" rel=\"nofollow\">Embed<\/a><\/p><p class=\"powerpress_embed_box\" id=\"powerpress_embed_288-podcast\" style=\"display: none;\"><input id=\"powerpress_embed_288-podcast_t\" type=\"text\" value=\"&lt;iframe src=&quot;https:\/\/player.blubrry.com\/?media_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.blubrry.com%2Fproductivitycast%2Fcontent.blubrry.com%2Fproductivitycast%2F029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-processing-email-messages-productivitycast.mp3&amp;podcast_link=https%3A%2F%2Fproductivitycast.net%2F029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast%2F&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; width=&quot;100%&quot; height=&quot;165&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; id=&quot;blubrryplayer-2&quot; class=&quot;blubrryplayer&quot; title=&quot;Blubrry Podcast Player&quot;&gt;&lt;\/iframe&gt;\" onclick=\"javascript: this.select();\" onfocus=\"javascript: this.select();\" style=\"width: 70%;\" readOnly><\/p><p class=\"powerpress_links powerpress_subscribe_links\">Subscribe: <a href=\"https:\/\/itunes.apple.com\/us\/podcast\/productivitycast\/id1088480807?mt=2&amp;ls=1#episodeGuid=http%3A%2F%2Fproductivitycast.net%2F%3Fp%3D288\" class=\"powerpress_link_subscribe powerpress_link_subscribe_itunes\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Subscribe on Apple Podcasts\" rel=\"nofollow\">Apple Podcasts<\/a> | <a href=\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/feed\/podcast\/\" class=\"powerpress_link_subscribe powerpress_link_subscribe_rss\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Subscribe via RSS\" rel=\"nofollow\">RSS<\/a> | <a href=\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/subscribe\/\" class=\"powerpress_link_subscribe powerpress_link_subscribe_more\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"More\" rel=\"nofollow\">More<\/a><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As we discussed email in the last episode, email management of multiple accounts has its positives and negatives. All of us, Augusto, Art, Francis and I have multiple email accounts. And, to be honest, I don\u2019t know many people who have only one solitary email account. But, whether you have one inbox, or 10 inboxes, one methodology that\u2019s cropped up and lingered for nearly two decades is the idea of <em>Inbox Zero<\/em>. In this cast, we discuss the history of Inbox Zero (with the pros and cons), some related concepts that I\u2019ve theorized over the years (namely my Inbox One and Tab Zero methods, the former of which I hinted at in the last cast), and get feedback and permutations from the <em>ProductivityCast<\/em> team. We close with some thoughts on email message processing.\u00a0<\/span>Enjoy! <a href=\"http:\/\/productivitycast.net\/contact\/\">Give us feedback<\/a>! And, thanks for listening!<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;d like to discuss this episode, please <a href=\"#reply-title\">click here to leave a comment<\/a> down below (this jumps you to the bottom of the post).<\/p>\n<h2>In this Cast<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/productivitycast.net\/about\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Ray Sidney-Smith<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/productivitycast.net\/about\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Augusto Pinaud<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/productivitycast.net\/about\/\">Francis Wade<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/productivitycast.net\/about\/\">Art Gelwicks<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Show Notes<\/h2>\n<p><em>Resources we mention, including links to them will be provided here. Please listen to the episode for context.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"810\" height=\"608\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/z9UjeTMb3Yk?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=z9UjeTMb3Yk\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cInbox Zero\u201d (GoogleTechTalks)<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> by Merlin Mann<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/amzn.to\/2B7oj76\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Getting Things Done<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> by David Allen<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.43folders.com\/izero\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">43 Folders Series: Inbox Zero<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (also by Merlin Mann)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/thenextweb.com\/opinion\/2015\/07\/26\/bluetoot\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Forget \u2018Inbox Zero\u2019: Your empty email account means nothing<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/rsidneysmith.com\/evernote\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Evernote<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/amzn.to\/2z1yvfJ\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fujitsu ScanSnap iX500<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scansnapcloud.com\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ScanSnap Cloud<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ray\u2019s Web browser corollary to Inbox Zero, <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/twominuterule.com\/post\/142294174509\/tab-zero\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Tab Zero<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Raw Text Transcript<\/h2>\n<p><em>Raw, unedited and machine-produced text transcript so there may be substantial errors, but you can search for specific points in the episode to jump to, or to reference back to at a later date and time, by keywords or key phrases. The time coding is h:mm:ss.ms to\u00a0h:mm:ss.ms (e.g., 0:00:00.000,0:00:04.000 starts at 0.00 seconds and ends at 4 seconds in the cast&#8217;s audio).<\/em><\/p>\n<span><a onclick=\"read_toggle(177162637, 'Read More', 'Read Less'); return false;\" class=\"read-link\" id=\"readlink177162637\" style=\"readlink\" href=\"#\">Read More<\/a><\/span>\n<div class=\"read_div\" id=\"read177162637\" style=\"display: none;\"><\/p>\n<p>1<br \/>\n00:00:00,000 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:03,870<br \/>\nare you ready to manage your work and<\/p>\n<p>2<br \/>\n00:00:02,159 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:06,120<br \/>\npersonal world better to live a<\/p>\n<p>3<br \/>\n00:00:03,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:07,350<br \/>\nfulfilling productive life then you&#8217;ve<\/p>\n<p>4<br \/>\n00:00:06,120 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:09,809<br \/>\ncome to the right place<\/p>\n<p>5<br \/>\n00:00:07,350 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:12,090<br \/>\nproductivity cast the weekly show about<\/p>\n<p>6<br \/>\n00:00:09,809 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:14,480<br \/>\nall things productivity here are your<\/p>\n<p>7<br \/>\n00:00:12,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:18,180<br \/>\nhosts ray Sydney Smith and Augusto<\/p>\n<p>8<br \/>\n00:00:14,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:21,750<br \/>\npronounces weight and art Galax welcome<\/p>\n<p>9<br \/>\n00:00:18,180 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:25,410<br \/>\neverybody to productivity cast episode 0<\/p>\n<p>10<br \/>\n00:00:21,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:28,560<br \/>\nto 9 episode 29 inbox zero inbox 1 and<\/p>\n<p>11<br \/>\n00:00:25,410 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:30,800<br \/>\nprocessing email messages we are going<\/p>\n<p>12<br \/>\n00:00:28,560 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:33,600<br \/>\nto be talking about the all-encompassing<\/p>\n<p>13<br \/>\n00:00:30,800 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:37,559<br \/>\ninbox and how to deal with your inbox<\/p>\n<p>14<br \/>\n00:00:33,600 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:40,200<br \/>\nand so I wanted to lead off because as<\/p>\n<p>15<br \/>\n00:00:37,559 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:43,230<br \/>\nwe discussed email in the last episode<\/p>\n<p>16<br \/>\n00:00:40,200 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:45,719<br \/>\nemail management of multiple accounts<\/p>\n<p>17<br \/>\n00:00:43,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:48,390<br \/>\nhas its positives and negatives all of<\/p>\n<p>18<br \/>\n00:00:45,719 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:50,640<br \/>\nus Augusto art Francis and I have<\/p>\n<p>19<br \/>\n00:00:48,390 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:53,219<br \/>\nmultiple email accounts and to be honest<\/p>\n<p>20<br \/>\n00:00:50,640 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:56,489<br \/>\nI don&#8217;t know how many people who have<\/p>\n<p>21<br \/>\n00:00:53,219 &#8211;&gt; 00:00:59,010<br \/>\nonly one single solitary email account<\/p>\n<p>22<br \/>\n00:00:56,489 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:01,260<br \/>\nbut whether you have one inbox or 10<\/p>\n<p>23<br \/>\n00:00:59,010 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:03,180<br \/>\ninboxes one methodology that&#8217;s cropped<\/p>\n<p>24<br \/>\n00:01:01,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:08,010<br \/>\nup over the past decade is the idea of<\/p>\n<p>25<br \/>\n00:01:03,180 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:12,000<br \/>\ninbox zero it came from Merlin Mann who<\/p>\n<p>26<br \/>\n00:01:08,010 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:13,830<br \/>\ndid a google Tech Talk back in 2007 and<\/p>\n<p>27<br \/>\n00:01:12,000 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:15,360<br \/>\nI will put a link to that in the show<\/p>\n<p>28<br \/>\n00:01:13,830 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:17,850<br \/>\nnotes if those of you who want to watch<\/p>\n<p>29<br \/>\n00:01:15,360 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:20,460<br \/>\nI believe is about an hour or so he<\/p>\n<p>30<br \/>\n00:01:17,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:22,170<br \/>\ntalks about this idea of inbox zero so<\/p>\n<p>31<br \/>\n00:01:20,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:25,290<br \/>\nin this cast we&#8217;re gonna discuss a<\/p>\n<p>32<br \/>\n00:01:22,170 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:28,409<br \/>\nlittle bit about inbox zero its pros and<\/p>\n<p>33<br \/>\n00:01:25,290 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:30,150<br \/>\ncons some related concepts that I&#8217;ve<\/p>\n<p>34<br \/>\n00:01:28,409 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:33,150<br \/>\nkind of thought about over the past<\/p>\n<p>35<br \/>\n00:01:30,150 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:36,689<br \/>\ncouple of years namely inbox 1 and the<\/p>\n<p>36<br \/>\n00:01:33,150 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:38,640<br \/>\ntab 0 methods and get feedback and<\/p>\n<p>37<br \/>\n00:01:36,689 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:40,950<br \/>\npermutations from the productivity cast<\/p>\n<p>38<br \/>\n00:01:38,640 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:44,100<br \/>\nteam will close them with some thoughts<\/p>\n<p>39<br \/>\n00:01:40,950 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:46,320<br \/>\non email message processing from my<\/p>\n<p>40<br \/>\n00:01:44,100 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:47,909<br \/>\nesteemed colleagues and I think this is<\/p>\n<p>41<br \/>\n00:01:46,320 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:49,649<br \/>\ngonna be a great podcast it&#8217;s gonna have<\/p>\n<p>42<br \/>\n00:01:47,909 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:52,740<br \/>\na lot of really great information for us<\/p>\n<p>43<br \/>\n00:01:49,649 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:56,040<br \/>\nall so let&#8217;s kick it off with who wants<\/p>\n<p>44<br \/>\n00:01:52,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:57,180<br \/>\nto kind of describe in brief the concept<\/p>\n<p>45<br \/>\n00:01:56,040 &#8211;&gt; 00:01:59,310<br \/>\nof inbox 0<\/p>\n<p>46<br \/>\n00:01:57,180 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:03,390<br \/>\nwhat Merlin Mann was really talking<\/p>\n<p>47<br \/>\n00:01:59,310 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:05,790<br \/>\nabout as a as a kind of extension of<\/p>\n<p>48<br \/>\n00:02:03,390 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:09,509<br \/>\ngetting things done by David Allen and<\/p>\n<p>49<br \/>\n00:02:05,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:13,110<br \/>\nthis idea of of capturing and then<\/p>\n<p>50<br \/>\n00:02:09,509 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:13,890<br \/>\nprocessing ones inboxes I don&#8217;t know if<\/p>\n<p>51<br \/>\n00:02:13,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:16,610<br \/>\nany of us<\/p>\n<p>52<br \/>\n00:02:13,890 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:18,959<br \/>\ntruly understand what the current<\/p>\n<p>53<br \/>\n00:02:16,610 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:22,080<br \/>\ndefinition of that is I know what mine<\/p>\n<p>54<br \/>\n00:02:18,959 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:24,270<br \/>\nis and and I&#8217;m sure &#8211; not matching<\/p>\n<p>55<br \/>\n00:02:22,080 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:28,980<br \/>\nwhat&#8217;s in the literature but in the<\/p>\n<p>56<br \/>\n00:02:24,270 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:31,680<br \/>\nmentality of being able to get eliminate<\/p>\n<p>57<br \/>\n00:02:28,980 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:34,800<br \/>\nall actionable items and processing<\/p>\n<p>58<br \/>\n00:02:31,680 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:37,280<br \/>\nitems from a common email inbox or a<\/p>\n<p>59<br \/>\n00:02:34,800 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:40,590<br \/>\nsingular email inbox<\/p>\n<p>60<br \/>\n00:02:37,280 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:42,480<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s to my knowledge that&#8217;s it in a<\/p>\n<p>61<br \/>\n00:02:40,590 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:44,370<br \/>\nnutshell now what have I missed guys I<\/p>\n<p>62<br \/>\n00:02:42,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:47,130<br \/>\nwill add a couple of things you know<\/p>\n<p>63<br \/>\n00:02:44,370 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:49,200<br \/>\nwhat what Merlin man was talking about<\/p>\n<p>64<br \/>\n00:02:47,130 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:51,510<br \/>\nwhen he was talking about inbox zero is<\/p>\n<p>65<br \/>\n00:02:49,200 &#8211;&gt; 00:02:56,280<br \/>\nthat David Allen talked about this idea<\/p>\n<p>66<br \/>\n00:02:51,510 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:00,660<br \/>\nthat your task inbox should really be<\/p>\n<p>67<br \/>\n00:02:56,280 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:04,080<br \/>\ncleared out every 24 to 48 hours and I<\/p>\n<p>68<br \/>\n00:03:00,660 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:06,780<br \/>\ndon&#8217;t actually know what David Allen was<\/p>\n<p>69<br \/>\n00:03:04,080 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:07,920<br \/>\nspecifically thinking but I have tended<\/p>\n<p>70<br \/>\n00:03:06,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:10,940<br \/>\nto think about that from the perspective<\/p>\n<p>71<br \/>\n00:03:07,920 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:13,950<br \/>\nthat he wasn&#8217;t talking about necessarily<\/p>\n<p>72<br \/>\n00:03:10,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:17,489<br \/>\nyour communications inboxes that is<\/p>\n<p>73<br \/>\n00:03:13,950 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:20,310<br \/>\nemail and voicemail boxes and so forth<\/p>\n<p>74<br \/>\n00:03:17,489 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:23,720<br \/>\nhe was really talking about your in tray<\/p>\n<p>75<br \/>\n00:03:20,310 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:27,299<br \/>\nthe basket in which you receive your<\/p>\n<p>76<br \/>\n00:03:23,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:30,750<br \/>\ninputs right so whether you took notes<\/p>\n<p>77<br \/>\n00:03:27,299 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:34,440<br \/>\nor received letters or memos or whatever<\/p>\n<p>78<br \/>\n00:03:30,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:37,200<br \/>\nthat inbox was the one that I perceive<\/p>\n<p>79<br \/>\n00:03:34,440 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:40,079<br \/>\nhim to frequently be talking about not<\/p>\n<p>80<br \/>\n00:03:37,200 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:42,720<br \/>\nnecessarily your email inbox but it is<\/p>\n<p>81<br \/>\n00:03:40,079 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:45,299<br \/>\nanother one of those in baskets as he<\/p>\n<p>82<br \/>\n00:03:42,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:49,049<br \/>\ntalks about and getting things done so I<\/p>\n<p>83<br \/>\n00:03:45,299 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:51,989<br \/>\nget it my thought here is that it&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>84<br \/>\n00:03:49,049 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:54,600<br \/>\nreally important or let me take a step<\/p>\n<p>85<br \/>\n00:03:51,989 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:56,579<br \/>\nback what I believe Merlin Mann was<\/p>\n<p>86<br \/>\n00:03:54,600 &#8211;&gt; 00:03:58,739<br \/>\ntalking about and and sort of the the<\/p>\n<p>87<br \/>\n00:03:56,579 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:01,140<br \/>\ncrux of what he was talking about was<\/p>\n<p>88<br \/>\n00:03:58,739 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:05,310<br \/>\nthat very similar to the way that we<\/p>\n<p>89<br \/>\n00:04:01,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:09,269<br \/>\nreceive mail in our home mail boxes we<\/p>\n<p>90<br \/>\n00:04:05,310 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:12,450<br \/>\nreceive a an influx of physical inputs<\/p>\n<p>91<br \/>\n00:04:09,269 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:15,780<br \/>\nand we take those out and we deal with<\/p>\n<p>92<br \/>\n00:04:12,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:17,820<br \/>\nthem and we don&#8217;t put them back in the<\/p>\n<p>93<br \/>\n00:04:15,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:20,340<br \/>\nmail box right they it&#8217;s sort of a<\/p>\n<p>94<br \/>\n00:04:17,820 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:22,200<br \/>\none-way conveyor belt if you want to<\/p>\n<p>95<br \/>\n00:04:20,340 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:26,340<br \/>\nthink of it that way that we process<\/p>\n<p>96<br \/>\n00:04:22,200 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:29,580<br \/>\nthings and go go from there so<\/p>\n<p>97<br \/>\n00:04:26,340 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:34,020<br \/>\nif we want to if we want to have a clear<\/p>\n<p>98<br \/>\n00:04:29,580 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:36,720<br \/>\nsort of runway in in or ground level in<\/p>\n<p>99<br \/>\n00:04:34,020 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:40,410<br \/>\nGTD language we then need to that we<\/p>\n<p>100<br \/>\n00:04:36,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:42,600<br \/>\nneed to then have a an ability to<\/p>\n<p>101<br \/>\n00:04:40,410 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:46,440<br \/>\nprocess or clarify those things that are<\/p>\n<p>102<br \/>\n00:04:42,600 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:49,889<br \/>\ncoming in as inputs and and dealing with<\/p>\n<p>103<br \/>\n00:04:46,440 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:52,080<br \/>\njust the things that are new as they&#8217;re<\/p>\n<p>104<br \/>\n00:04:49,889 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:55,290<br \/>\ncoming in the inbox is a poor place to<\/p>\n<p>105<br \/>\n00:04:52,080 &#8211;&gt; 00:04:58,110<br \/>\nmanage inputs if we&#8217;ve got a whole bunch<\/p>\n<p>106<br \/>\n00:04:55,290 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:00,720<br \/>\nof other stuff in there that may or may<\/p>\n<p>107<br \/>\n00:04:58,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:03,900<br \/>\nnot even be organized but the things<\/p>\n<p>108<br \/>\n00:05:00,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:06,150<br \/>\nthat come in into in should truly be new<\/p>\n<p>109<br \/>\n00:05:03,900 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:09,720<br \/>\nstuff coming in not just old stuff<\/p>\n<p>110<br \/>\n00:05:06,150 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:12,660<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s been hanging around so one of the<\/p>\n<p>111<br \/>\n00:05:09,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:17,910<br \/>\ninteresting things about the time Merlyn<\/p>\n<p>112<br \/>\n00:05:12,660 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:22,800<br \/>\nman came with was his inbox zero concept<\/p>\n<p>113<br \/>\n00:05:17,910 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:26,910<br \/>\nwas that I don&#8217;t people were clear but<\/p>\n<p>114<br \/>\n00:05:22,800 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:28,770<br \/>\nthe message at the time from from David<\/p>\n<p>115<br \/>\n00:05:26,910 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:31,560<br \/>\nand I agree on that it wasn&#8217;t clear on<\/p>\n<p>116<br \/>\n00:05:28,770 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:34,860<br \/>\nwell you&#8217;re going to process but he was<\/p>\n<p>117<br \/>\n00:05:31,560 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:38,610<br \/>\nreally well you process what you can and<\/p>\n<p>118<br \/>\n00:05:34,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:40,650<br \/>\nand what he&#8217;s come said there were those<\/p>\n<p>119<br \/>\n00:05:38,610 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:44,490<br \/>\ntwo concepts that he brought that were<\/p>\n<p>120<br \/>\n00:05:40,650 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:47,520<br \/>\nquite interested interesting at the time<\/p>\n<p>121<br \/>\n00:05:44,490 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:52,770<br \/>\none was that inbox Hiro comment that<\/p>\n<p>122<br \/>\n00:05:47,520 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:56,430<br \/>\nthat really put him into a famous part<\/p>\n<p>123<br \/>\n00:05:52,770 &#8211;&gt; 00:05:58,260<br \/>\nfor colored some way because he was he<\/p>\n<p>124<br \/>\n00:05:56,430 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:00,389<br \/>\nbring it over to say well it&#8217;s not<\/p>\n<p>125<br \/>\n00:05:58,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:02,039<br \/>\nenough to to be able to process you<\/p>\n<p>126<br \/>\n00:06:00,389 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:04,530<br \/>\nreally need to get surround your goal<\/p>\n<p>127<br \/>\n00:06:02,039 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:06,479<br \/>\nneed to be to process everything so you<\/p>\n<p>128<br \/>\n00:06:04,530 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:10,250<br \/>\ndon&#8217;t have everything or stuff hanging<\/p>\n<p>129<br \/>\n00:06:06,479 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:14,450<br \/>\nout and the other thing that he brought<\/p>\n<p>130<br \/>\n00:06:10,250 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:18,810<br \/>\npretty close to that was the concept of<\/p>\n<p>131<br \/>\n00:06:14,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:21,870<br \/>\nthe hipster PDA where you start having<\/p>\n<p>132<br \/>\n00:06:18,810 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:25,770<br \/>\nyour system in paper in index cards to<\/p>\n<p>133<br \/>\n00:06:21,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:28,860<br \/>\nbe precise and that&#8217;s how you create a<\/p>\n<p>134<br \/>\n00:06:25,770 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:30,630<br \/>\nsystem the problem with the paper system<\/p>\n<p>135<br \/>\n00:06:28,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:33,600<br \/>\nis still my problem to this day as much<\/p>\n<p>136<br \/>\n00:06:30,630 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:36,030<br \/>\nas I will love it is it do not allow it<\/p>\n<p>137<br \/>\n00:06:33,600 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:38,490<br \/>\nonly allow a certain amount of input and<\/p>\n<p>138<br \/>\n00:06:36,030 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:39,590<br \/>\nas soon as you surpass that point you<\/p>\n<p>139<br \/>\n00:06:38,490 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:43,190<br \/>\nbreak it<\/p>\n<p>140<br \/>\n00:06:39,590 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:45,910<br \/>\nbut the inbox zero it&#8217;s still a good<\/p>\n<p>141<br \/>\n00:06:43,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:50,750<br \/>\nconcept and it&#8217;s a good concept that<\/p>\n<p>142<br \/>\n00:06:45,910 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:56,090<br \/>\nsadly for most people it&#8217;s unheard of<\/p>\n<p>143<br \/>\n00:06:50,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:06:58,520<br \/>\nyou know I there is a on one and one of<\/p>\n<p>144<br \/>\n00:06:56,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:01,550<br \/>\nthe many things I have heard David Allen<\/p>\n<p>145<br \/>\n00:06:58,520 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:04,310<br \/>\ntalking he he made a point that that is<\/p>\n<p>146<br \/>\n00:07:01,550 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:08,180<br \/>\nreally interesting and he said most<\/p>\n<p>147<br \/>\n00:07:04,310 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:10,250<br \/>\npeople has never seen inbox zero if you<\/p>\n<p>148<br \/>\n00:07:08,180 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:12,590<br \/>\ngo right now and open a new email<\/p>\n<p>149<br \/>\n00:07:10,250 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:16,130<br \/>\naccount doesn&#8217;t matter if you are going<\/p>\n<p>150<br \/>\n00:07:12,590 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:18,110<br \/>\nto pay for exchange or office 365 you<\/p>\n<p>151<br \/>\n00:07:16,130 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:21,050<br \/>\nare going to get corporate Google or you<\/p>\n<p>152<br \/>\n00:07:18,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:23,240<br \/>\njust go for a free account anywhere as<\/p>\n<p>153<br \/>\n00:07:21,050 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:26,090<br \/>\nsoon as you open and get to that inbox<\/p>\n<p>154<br \/>\n00:07:23,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:28,820<br \/>\nyou already have to okay because you<\/p>\n<p>155<br \/>\n00:07:26,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:32,000<br \/>\nhave a welcome and set up and so for<\/p>\n<p>156<br \/>\n00:07:28,820 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:36,979<br \/>\nmost people inbox zero is something that<\/p>\n<p>157<br \/>\n00:07:32,000 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:39,919<br \/>\nis unheard of and because of that they<\/p>\n<p>158<br \/>\n00:07:36,979 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:44,180<br \/>\nhave never experienced the power who<\/p>\n<p>159<br \/>\n00:07:39,919 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:48,320<br \/>\nhave have to look at that and have<\/p>\n<p>160<br \/>\n00:07:44,180 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:52,010<br \/>\neverything process during the years I<\/p>\n<p>161<br \/>\n00:07:48,320 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:54,130<br \/>\nhave advised people to unplug you know<\/p>\n<p>162<br \/>\n00:07:52,010 &#8211;&gt; 00:07:57,110<br \/>\nkill the web download your email on<\/p>\n<p>163<br \/>\n00:07:54,130 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:00,110<br \/>\ndisconnect from the internet and then<\/p>\n<p>164<br \/>\n00:07:57,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:02,030<br \/>\nrespond to that process all that you<\/p>\n<p>165<br \/>\n00:08:00,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:03,650<br \/>\nknow doesn&#8217;t matter the emails will go<\/p>\n<p>166<br \/>\n00:08:02,030 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:06,620<br \/>\nout as soon as you reconnect to the<\/p>\n<p>167<br \/>\n00:08:03,650 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:09,500<br \/>\ninternet but is for most people the only<\/p>\n<p>168<br \/>\n00:08:06,620 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:13,460<br \/>\nchance you have to actually get to zero<\/p>\n<p>169<br \/>\n00:08:09,500 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:15,860<br \/>\nI get you know emails are afraid that if<\/p>\n<p>170<br \/>\n00:08:13,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:18,860<br \/>\nI don&#8217;t disconnect that way I will never<\/p>\n<p>171<br \/>\n00:08:15,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:21,860<br \/>\nsee inbox zero and I wish to say that<\/p>\n<p>172<br \/>\n00:08:18,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:27,560<br \/>\nI&#8217;m unique on that but sadly that&#8217;s not<\/p>\n<p>173<br \/>\n00:08:21,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:29,090<br \/>\nbatch of originality anymore yeah here I<\/p>\n<p>174<br \/>\n00:08:27,560 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:31,100<br \/>\nwant to backtrack a second though and<\/p>\n<p>175<br \/>\n00:08:29,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:34,039<br \/>\nnow that my brain cells are starting to<\/p>\n<p>176<br \/>\n00:08:31,100 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:36,860<br \/>\nfire properly on a Monday morning the<\/p>\n<p>177<br \/>\n00:08:34,039 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:40,310<br \/>\nconcept of inbox zero I think starts off<\/p>\n<p>178<br \/>\n00:08:36,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:43,459<br \/>\nwith a misnomer when we say inbox zero<\/p>\n<p>179<br \/>\n00:08:40,310 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:45,620<br \/>\nand I&#8217;m going back to what I read from<\/p>\n<p>180<br \/>\n00:08:43,459 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:47,780<br \/>\nMerlin Mann and that sort we make the<\/p>\n<p>181<br \/>\n00:08:45,620 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:50,060<br \/>\nmistake of associating directly inbox<\/p>\n<p>182<br \/>\n00:08:47,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:53,330<br \/>\nwith email and that&#8217;s not the case in<\/p>\n<p>183<br \/>\n00:08:50,060 &#8211;&gt; 00:08:56,149<br \/>\nthis context inboxes incoming<\/p>\n<p>184<br \/>\n00:08:53,330 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:00,080<br \/>\nwork requests incoming information<\/p>\n<p>185<br \/>\n00:08:56,149 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:02,029<br \/>\nwhether it&#8217;s in an email whether it&#8217;s an<\/p>\n<p>186<br \/>\n00:09:00,080 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:04,670<br \/>\ninstant message whether it&#8217;s a paper<\/p>\n<p>187<br \/>\n00:09:02,029 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:07,250<br \/>\nmail you get whether it&#8217;s a note for<\/p>\n<p>188<br \/>\n00:09:04,670 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:11,540<br \/>\nyourself you leave in the desk if you<\/p>\n<p>189<br \/>\n00:09:07,250 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:14,329<br \/>\nlook at how GTD works you have Alan lays<\/p>\n<p>190<br \/>\n00:09:11,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:15,350<br \/>\nout have a box and if you have something<\/p>\n<p>191<br \/>\n00:09:14,329 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:17,180<br \/>\nto do you write a note on it and you<\/p>\n<p>192<br \/>\n00:09:15,350 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:19,910<br \/>\nstick it in the box and you process that<\/p>\n<p>193<br \/>\n00:09:17,180 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:21,860<br \/>\nbox down so the exercise is really<\/p>\n<p>194<br \/>\n00:09:19,910 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:25,279<br \/>\naround the processing of incoming<\/p>\n<p>195<br \/>\n00:09:21,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:28,310<br \/>\ninformation that capture meant mechanism<\/p>\n<p>196<br \/>\n00:09:25,279 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:30,920<br \/>\nit does not directly have to associate<\/p>\n<p>197<br \/>\n00:09:28,310 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:32,630<br \/>\nwith inbox with an email inbox nice it<\/p>\n<p>198<br \/>\n00:09:30,920 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:35,240<br \/>\nwhen I was thinking about this this<\/p>\n<p>199<br \/>\n00:09:32,630 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:36,800<br \/>\nmorning and last night that&#8217;s where I<\/p>\n<p>200<br \/>\n00:09:35,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:39,529<br \/>\nwas getting a little hung up because we<\/p>\n<p>201<br \/>\n00:09:36,800 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:41,269<br \/>\nget so wrapped up in this I&#8217;ve got to<\/p>\n<p>202<br \/>\n00:09:39,529 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:45,130<br \/>\nget my inbox<\/p>\n<p>203<br \/>\n00:09:41,269 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:48,740<br \/>\nergo email inbox down to nothing in it<\/p>\n<p>204<br \/>\n00:09:45,130 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:50,000<br \/>\nthere is no correlation between that and<\/p>\n<p>205<br \/>\n00:09:48,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:53,680<br \/>\nbeing productive<\/p>\n<p>206<br \/>\n00:09:50,000 &#8211;&gt; 00:09:57,920<br \/>\nthere is no causality there whatsoever<\/p>\n<p>207<br \/>\n00:09:53,680 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:00,980<br \/>\nbeing able to handle everything that&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>208<br \/>\n00:09:57,920 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:03,589<br \/>\ncoming in and whatever mechanism it&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>209<br \/>\n00:10:00,980 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:07,760<br \/>\ncoming in and process it into your<\/p>\n<p>210<br \/>\n00:10:03,589 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:10,610<br \/>\ntrusted system is my understanding the<\/p>\n<p>211<br \/>\n00:10:07,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:13,190<br \/>\ncore of what inbox zero truly is it&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>212<br \/>\n00:10:10,610 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:16,430<br \/>\nclosing those loops out and not letting<\/p>\n<p>213<br \/>\n00:10:13,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:20,750<br \/>\nstuff just sit out there in the capture<\/p>\n<p>214<br \/>\n00:10:16,430 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:25,760<br \/>\nstage of your process now with that<\/p>\n<p>215<br \/>\n00:10:20,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:29,000<br \/>\nbeing said inbox associated with in<\/p>\n<p>216<br \/>\n00:10:25,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:32,660<br \/>\nemail is probably the biggest culprit of<\/p>\n<p>217<br \/>\n00:10:29,000 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:35,149<br \/>\nstuff coming to us but when Merlin man<\/p>\n<p>218<br \/>\n00:10:32,660 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:36,949<br \/>\noriginally set this up that would be a<\/p>\n<p>219<br \/>\n00:10:35,149 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:39,440<br \/>\ndirect association that would be true<\/p>\n<p>220<br \/>\n00:10:36,949 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:42,589<br \/>\nbut that&#8217;s not the case anymore we&#8217;ve<\/p>\n<p>221<br \/>\n00:10:39,440 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:45,320<br \/>\ngot so many inputs now whether it&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>222<br \/>\n00:10:42,589 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:47,899<br \/>\nemail whether it&#8217;s social media whatever<\/p>\n<p>223<br \/>\n00:10:45,320 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:51,110<br \/>\nwe&#8217;ve got to have systems that allow us<\/p>\n<p>224<br \/>\n00:10:47,899 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:54,260<br \/>\nto pull in multiple things and put it<\/p>\n<p>225<br \/>\n00:10:51,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:57,560<br \/>\ninto a conceptual inbox and I think what<\/p>\n<p>226<br \/>\n00:10:54,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:10:59,779<br \/>\ntriggered it for me is I used to do it<\/p>\n<p>227<br \/>\n00:10:57,560 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:02,390<br \/>\nfor all my tasks tracking and the<\/p>\n<p>228<br \/>\n00:10:59,779 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:04,970<br \/>\ndefault box that they use the default<\/p>\n<p>229<br \/>\n00:11:02,390 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:07,470<br \/>\nplace for new tasks to go in is called<\/p>\n<p>230<br \/>\n00:11:04,970 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:12,270<br \/>\nthe Inbox<\/p>\n<p>231<br \/>\n00:11:07,470 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:15,870<br \/>\nI agree with you and and that&#8217;s one of<\/p>\n<p>232<br \/>\n00:11:12,270 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:19,140<br \/>\nthe things that was starting to change<\/p>\n<p>233<br \/>\n00:11:15,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:23,550<br \/>\nat that time you know before before that<\/p>\n<p>234<br \/>\n00:11:19,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:25,500<br \/>\ntalk you know we as much of some of the<\/p>\n<p>235<br \/>\n00:11:23,550 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:28,080<br \/>\ntechnologies like text message and those<\/p>\n<p>236<br \/>\n00:11:25,500 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:29,010<br \/>\nthings are now seems like oh we have<\/p>\n<p>237<br \/>\n00:11:28,080 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:32,100<br \/>\nhave them forever<\/p>\n<p>238<br \/>\n00:11:29,010 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:36,120<br \/>\nthere were technologies that were not<\/p>\n<p>239<br \/>\n00:11:32,100 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:40,020<br \/>\nnecessarily must adopted yet when when<\/p>\n<p>240<br \/>\n00:11:36,120 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:43,650<br \/>\nthat talk came out and and there was<\/p>\n<p>241<br \/>\n00:11:40,020 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:45,870<br \/>\nother on there and there was the other<\/p>\n<p>242<br \/>\n00:11:43,650 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:49,290<br \/>\nin books and I agree he referred inbox<\/p>\n<p>243<br \/>\n00:11:45,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:52,710<br \/>\nzero us every inbox you have the problem<\/p>\n<p>244<br \/>\n00:11:49,290 &#8211;&gt; 00:11:57,090<br \/>\nis for most people you know a lot of<\/p>\n<p>245<br \/>\n00:11:52,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:01,020<br \/>\nthat inbox zero thing happened to be on<\/p>\n<p>246<br \/>\n00:11:57,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:03,870<br \/>\nthe email that&#8217;s and emails and text<\/p>\n<p>247<br \/>\n00:12:01,020 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:06,780<br \/>\nmessages even more than voicemails these<\/p>\n<p>248<br \/>\n00:12:03,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:10,050<br \/>\ndays I don&#8217;t you know I don&#8217;t get at<\/p>\n<p>249<br \/>\n00:12:06,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:15,930<br \/>\nleast for me I don&#8217;t get as many voice<\/p>\n<p>250<br \/>\n00:12:10,050 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:18,090<br \/>\nmails as I get texts and emails but if<\/p>\n<p>251<br \/>\n00:12:15,930 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:20,850<br \/>\nyou don&#8217;t know how to process all those<\/p>\n<p>252<br \/>\n00:12:18,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:25,020<br \/>\nwhat you leave is a bunch of stuff<\/p>\n<p>253<br \/>\n00:12:20,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:28,020<br \/>\nhanging around that it will make<\/p>\n<p>254<br \/>\n00:12:25,020 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:30,270<br \/>\nimpossible that it will make impossible<\/p>\n<p>255<br \/>\n00:12:28,020 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:32,010<br \/>\nto accomplish that inbox here that at<\/p>\n<p>256<br \/>\n00:12:30,270 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:34,650<br \/>\nthe same time make impossible to<\/p>\n<p>257<br \/>\n00:12:32,010 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:38,040<br \/>\naccomplish having any kind of control<\/p>\n<p>258<br \/>\n00:12:34,650 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:40,680<br \/>\nover anything so I think there are<\/p>\n<p>259<br \/>\n00:12:38,040 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:44,430<br \/>\narguments on both sides of the of the<\/p>\n<p>260<br \/>\n00:12:40,680 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:46,800<br \/>\naisle for inbox zero I I&#8217;m gonna place a<\/p>\n<p>261<br \/>\n00:12:44,430 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:49,770<br \/>\nlink to an interesting article from The<\/p>\n<p>262<br \/>\n00:12:46,800 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:53,250<br \/>\nNext Web that talks about the kind of<\/p>\n<p>263<br \/>\n00:12:49,770 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:55,890<br \/>\nanti inbox zero sentiment that has kind<\/p>\n<p>264<br \/>\n00:12:53,250 &#8211;&gt; 00:12:59,490<br \/>\nof grown up over time you know even Elon<\/p>\n<p>265<br \/>\n00:12:55,890 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:03,810<br \/>\nMusk has has said inbox zero is is is a<\/p>\n<p>266<br \/>\n00:12:59,490 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:06,000<br \/>\nfad is that this kind of trend akin to I<\/p>\n<p>267<br \/>\n00:13:03,810 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:07,860<br \/>\nforget what he what he likened it to but<\/p>\n<p>268<br \/>\n00:13:06,000 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:11,370<br \/>\nhe&#8217;s couldn&#8217;t kind of likened it to some<\/p>\n<p>269<br \/>\n00:13:07,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:13,710<br \/>\nsomething you know of a contemporary<\/p>\n<p>270<br \/>\n00:13:11,370 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:16,350<br \/>\nsort of fad that we have today and and I<\/p>\n<p>271<br \/>\n00:13:13,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:19,350<br \/>\nagain I go back to this idea that inbox<\/p>\n<p>272<br \/>\n00:13:16,350 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:21,030<br \/>\nzero has value in the sense that you<\/p>\n<p>273<br \/>\n00:13:19,350 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:21,310<br \/>\nknow this we should be understanding<\/p>\n<p>274<br \/>\n00:13:21,030 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:25,000<br \/>\nthat<\/p>\n<p>275<br \/>\n00:13:21,310 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:28,900<br \/>\ninputs are not where we maintain and<\/p>\n<p>276<br \/>\n00:13:25,000 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:31,750<br \/>\nmanage actions and therefore we should<\/p>\n<p>277<br \/>\n00:13:28,900 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:36,100<br \/>\nbe we should be moving things along a<\/p>\n<p>278<br \/>\n00:13:31,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:38,890<br \/>\nroute to get to a functional managed<\/p>\n<p>279<br \/>\n00:13:36,100 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:42,490<br \/>\nspace and I think that&#8217;s important again<\/p>\n<p>280<br \/>\n00:13:38,890 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:46,080<br \/>\nI&#8217;m gonna I&#8217;m gonna always lay waste to<\/p>\n<p>281<br \/>\n00:13:42,490 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:51,670<br \/>\nthe idea that inbox zero applies to<\/p>\n<p>282<br \/>\n00:13:46,080 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:54,220<br \/>\nanything more important than your task<\/p>\n<p>283<br \/>\n00:13:51,670 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:56,290<br \/>\ninbox as art was talking about you know<\/p>\n<p>284<br \/>\n00:13:54,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:57,640<br \/>\nwhere mate maybe to do a store other<\/p>\n<p>285<br \/>\n00:13:56,290 &#8211;&gt; 00:13:59,860<br \/>\ntools like remember the milk or<\/p>\n<p>286<br \/>\n00:13:57,640 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:02,589<br \/>\nOmniFocus or otherwise they provide an<\/p>\n<p>287<br \/>\n00:13:59,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:06,100<br \/>\ninbox for your tasks that are that are<\/p>\n<p>288<br \/>\n00:14:02,589 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:08,320<br \/>\nincoming potential commitments those<\/p>\n<p>289<br \/>\n00:14:06,100 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:11,050<br \/>\nthings that are coming in that&#8217;s way<\/p>\n<p>290<br \/>\n00:14:08,320 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:14,500<br \/>\nmore important to process than email<\/p>\n<p>291<br \/>\n00:14:11,050 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:18,100<br \/>\nhowever in the context of inbox zero for<\/p>\n<p>292<br \/>\n00:14:14,500 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:19,930<br \/>\nemail I think it&#8217;s this this is a good<\/p>\n<p>293<br \/>\n00:14:18,100 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:21,790<br \/>\ntime for me to sort of flush out this<\/p>\n<p>294<br \/>\n00:14:19,930 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:23,529<br \/>\nidea that I&#8217;ve I&#8217;ve been I&#8217;ve been<\/p>\n<p>295<br \/>\n00:14:21,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:25,630<br \/>\ntalking about and thinking about for<\/p>\n<p>296<br \/>\n00:14:23,529 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:28,060<br \/>\nquite some time which is which I just<\/p>\n<p>297<br \/>\n00:14:25,630 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:29,740<br \/>\nhave casually coined in box one I&#8217;m not<\/p>\n<p>298<br \/>\n00:14:28,060 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:33,220<br \/>\nI&#8217;m not particularly particularly wedded<\/p>\n<p>299<br \/>\n00:14:29,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:38,710<br \/>\nto the name but the idea here is that<\/p>\n<p>300<br \/>\n00:14:33,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:42,430<br \/>\nyou have a as few inboxes as possible<\/p>\n<p>301<br \/>\n00:14:38,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:44,860<br \/>\nfor input from many different sources<\/p>\n<p>302<br \/>\n00:14:42,430 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:47,380<br \/>\nand because technology allows for that<\/p>\n<p>303<br \/>\n00:14:44,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:51,480<br \/>\nto be the case we can do that so for<\/p>\n<p>304<br \/>\n00:14:47,380 &#8211;&gt; 00:14:55,710<br \/>\nexample I have you know signed up with a<\/p>\n<p>305<br \/>\n00:14:51,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:00,070<br \/>\nan online service that takes my mail and<\/p>\n<p>306<br \/>\n00:14:55,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:03,730<br \/>\ndigitizes that and sends me the mail you<\/p>\n<p>307<br \/>\n00:15:00,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:07,480<br \/>\nknow via email and just shows up in my<\/p>\n<p>308<br \/>\n00:15:03,730 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:11,320<br \/>\ninbox all of my email messages all come<\/p>\n<p>309<br \/>\n00:15:07,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:13,120<br \/>\ninto my my inbox right from many<\/p>\n<p>310<br \/>\n00:15:11,320 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:14,980<br \/>\ndifferent sources so that I can see that<\/p>\n<p>311<br \/>\n00:15:13,120 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:18,040<br \/>\nI&#8217;ve even gone to the effective of<\/p>\n<p>312<br \/>\n00:15:14,980 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:20,130<br \/>\nhaving all of my text messages and<\/p>\n<p>313<br \/>\n00:15:18,040 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:22,720<br \/>\nvoicemail messages through Google Voice<\/p>\n<p>314<br \/>\n00:15:20,130 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:26,740<br \/>\nforward it into my email inbox now<\/p>\n<p>315<br \/>\n00:15:22,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:29,800<br \/>\nremember if I&#8217;m using my phone I&#8217;m going<\/p>\n<p>316<br \/>\n00:15:26,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:32,890<br \/>\nto see those messages there so in in my<\/p>\n<p>317<br \/>\n00:15:29,800 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:35,070<br \/>\nsystem I&#8217;ve filtered them to folders so<\/p>\n<p>318<br \/>\n00:15:32,890 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:37,500<br \/>\nthey&#8217;re not showing up all and<\/p>\n<p>319<br \/>\n00:15:35,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:39,449<br \/>\nin my inbox I don&#8217;t need to see those in<\/p>\n<p>320<br \/>\n00:15:37,500 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:41,490<br \/>\nmy inbox but if I&#8217;m sitting at my<\/p>\n<p>321<br \/>\n00:15:39,449 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:43,079<br \/>\ncomputer and I&#8217;m not looking at my phone<\/p>\n<p>322<br \/>\n00:15:41,490 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:46,800<br \/>\nthen that&#8217;s where I&#8217;m going to be able<\/p>\n<p>323<br \/>\n00:15:43,079 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:48,930<br \/>\nto take inputs process them respond and<\/p>\n<p>324<br \/>\n00:15:46,800 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:51,060<br \/>\nget rid of them almost instantaneously<\/p>\n<p>325<br \/>\n00:15:48,930 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:52,079<br \/>\nand I&#8217;m sitting at a full keyboard and I<\/p>\n<p>326<br \/>\n00:15:51,060 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:54,990<br \/>\ndon&#8217;t know about the rest of you<\/p>\n<p>327<br \/>\n00:15:52,079 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:56,430<br \/>\ngentlemen but I tend to process much<\/p>\n<p>328<br \/>\n00:15:54,990 &#8211;&gt; 00:15:58,620<br \/>\nbetter when I have a full keyboard in<\/p>\n<p>329<br \/>\n00:15:56,430 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:00,870<br \/>\nfront of me and and that doesn&#8217;t matter<\/p>\n<p>330<br \/>\n00:15:58,620 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:02,519<br \/>\nwhat screen it is I just really like<\/p>\n<p>331<br \/>\n00:16:00,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:07,050<br \/>\nhaving a full keyboard in front of me so<\/p>\n<p>332<br \/>\n00:16:02,519 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:09,089<br \/>\nthe idea of inbox one is to to you know<\/p>\n<p>333<br \/>\n00:16:07,050 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:13,259<br \/>\nhave as many inboxes as you need but<\/p>\n<p>334<br \/>\n00:16:09,089 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:16,980<br \/>\nknow no more and to have as few inboxes<\/p>\n<p>335<br \/>\n00:16:13,259 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:18,839<br \/>\nas possible and no fewer and and if<\/p>\n<p>336<br \/>\n00:16:16,980 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:21,029<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s if that&#8217;s one inbox that&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>337<br \/>\n00:16:18,839 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:22,949<br \/>\nfantastic because then you have this one<\/p>\n<p>338<br \/>\n00:16:21,029 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:26,819<br \/>\nplace where everything is coming into<\/p>\n<p>339<br \/>\n00:16:22,949 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:30,899<br \/>\nand if it&#8217;s not like for me I have a<\/p>\n<p>340<br \/>\n00:16:26,819 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:33,529<br \/>\nwork you know inbox and a personal inbox<\/p>\n<p>341<br \/>\n00:16:30,899 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:37,290<br \/>\nand I filter those separately because of<\/p>\n<p>342<br \/>\n00:16:33,529 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:39,360<br \/>\ncontext I don&#8217;t think many people would<\/p>\n<p>343<br \/>\n00:16:37,290 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:41,069<br \/>\ndo very well and I&#8217;m curious to hear<\/p>\n<p>344<br \/>\n00:16:39,360 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:42,930<br \/>\nyour thoughts on this as to whether many<\/p>\n<p>345<br \/>\n00:16:41,069 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:45,690<br \/>\npeople would do well to have an inbox<\/p>\n<p>346<br \/>\n00:16:42,930 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:48,540<br \/>\none for their entire life both words<\/p>\n<p>347<br \/>\n00:16:45,690 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:50,790<br \/>\nwork and personal but perhaps there are<\/p>\n<p>348<br \/>\n00:16:48,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:52,079<br \/>\npeople out there who can do that it&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>349<br \/>\n00:16:50,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:54,990<br \/>\nkind of like people who like to manage<\/p>\n<p>350<br \/>\n00:16:52,079 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:57,029<br \/>\nall of their productivity system in one<\/p>\n<p>351<br \/>\n00:16:54,990 &#8211;&gt; 00:16:59,190<br \/>\ntool like an like a Microsoft Outlook<\/p>\n<p>352<br \/>\n00:16:57,029 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:02,670<br \/>\nwhere they they actually manage tasks<\/p>\n<p>353<br \/>\n00:16:59,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:05,309<br \/>\ncalendar email and notes and zones of<\/p>\n<p>354<br \/>\n00:17:02,670 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:07,439<br \/>\nworth all within outlook versus having<\/p>\n<p>355<br \/>\n00:17:05,309 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:09,959<br \/>\nmultiple applications for it you know I<\/p>\n<p>356<br \/>\n00:17:07,439 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:12,449<br \/>\ncan see definitely doing that I&#8217;ve seen<\/p>\n<p>357<br \/>\n00:17:09,959 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:14,850<br \/>\nand I&#8217;ve considered it myself where I<\/p>\n<p>358<br \/>\n00:17:12,449 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:17,220<br \/>\npersonally run into a hang-up is on the<\/p>\n<p>359<br \/>\n00:17:14,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:19,530<br \/>\nprocessing of the physical materials<\/p>\n<p>360<br \/>\n00:17:17,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:21,689<br \/>\ninto the digital system by a third party<\/p>\n<p>361<br \/>\n00:17:19,530 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:23,130<br \/>\nlike having my email forwarded and<\/p>\n<p>362<br \/>\n00:17:21,689 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:24,600<br \/>\nskinned dead that just gives me the<\/p>\n<p>363<br \/>\n00:17:23,130 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:27,360<br \/>\nheebie-jeebies so that&#8217;s not gonna<\/p>\n<p>364<br \/>\n00:17:24,600 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:29,760<br \/>\nhappen on on my watch for me<\/p>\n<p>365<br \/>\n00:17:27,360 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:33,780<br \/>\nbut those are things that I can manually<\/p>\n<p>366<br \/>\n00:17:29,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:35,880<br \/>\nprocess into my system being able to I<\/p>\n<p>367<br \/>\n00:17:33,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:37,980<br \/>\nthink where you run into the challenge<\/p>\n<p>368<br \/>\n00:17:35,880 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:40,500<br \/>\nwith that idea though is not the idea<\/p>\n<p>369<br \/>\n00:17:37,980 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:42,750<br \/>\nit&#8217;s the fact then you wind up with a<\/p>\n<p>370<br \/>\n00:17:40,500 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:45,570<br \/>\ntool that you&#8217;re trying to manage<\/p>\n<p>371<br \/>\n00:17:42,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:48,330<br \/>\neverything with and then we have then we<\/p>\n<p>372<br \/>\n00:17:45,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:48,990<br \/>\nget into that death spiral of trying to<\/p>\n<p>373<br \/>\n00:17:48,330 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:51,330<br \/>\nfind<\/p>\n<p>374<br \/>\n00:17:48,990 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:54,570<br \/>\nthe perfect tool that will do everything<\/p>\n<p>375<br \/>\n00:17:51,330 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:57,299<br \/>\nthat we need for that everything that&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>376<br \/>\n00:17:54,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:17:59,369<br \/>\ncoming into that box and I have yet to<\/p>\n<p>377<br \/>\n00:17:57,299 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:01,860<br \/>\nfind something like that I found things<\/p>\n<p>378<br \/>\n00:17:59,369 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:03,990<br \/>\nclose to it but nothing ever is a<\/p>\n<p>379<br \/>\n00:18:01,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:06,389<br \/>\nhundred percent so you constantly are<\/p>\n<p>380<br \/>\n00:18:03,990 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:08,220<br \/>\nhaving to tune in and check out the next<\/p>\n<p>381<br \/>\n00:18:06,389 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:08,909<br \/>\nlatest and greatest tool that&#8217;s coming<\/p>\n<p>382<br \/>\n00:18:08,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:12,480<br \/>\ndown the path<\/p>\n<p>383<br \/>\n00:18:08,909 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:16,230<br \/>\nI like the idea I use it primarily for<\/p>\n<p>384<br \/>\n00:18:12,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:19,619<br \/>\nas I said before for incoming emails but<\/p>\n<p>385<br \/>\n00:18:16,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:21,869<br \/>\neven then I don&#8217;t know that it&#8217;s a great<\/p>\n<p>386<br \/>\n00:18:19,619 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:25,080<br \/>\nidea but it just seems really hard to<\/p>\n<p>387<br \/>\n00:18:21,869 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:26,789<br \/>\nimplement I can understand that I can<\/p>\n<p>388<br \/>\n00:18:25,080 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:29,549<br \/>\nunderstand how how one would think that<\/p>\n<p>389<br \/>\n00:18:26,789 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:32,190<br \/>\nit would be difficult and I guess I did<\/p>\n<p>390<br \/>\n00:18:29,549 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:34,759<br \/>\nspend a considerable amount of time over<\/p>\n<p>391<br \/>\n00:18:32,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:37,169<br \/>\nthe years perfecting this you know I<\/p>\n<p>392<br \/>\n00:18:34,759 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:40,830<br \/>\ndidn&#8217;t just start out with a fujitsu<\/p>\n<p>393<br \/>\n00:18:37,169 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:42,480<br \/>\nscansnap ix500 you know and and<\/p>\n<p>394<br \/>\n00:18:40,830 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:44,399<br \/>\ncertainly many of the things that are<\/p>\n<p>395<br \/>\n00:18:42,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:47,999<br \/>\navailable today weren&#8217;t available when I<\/p>\n<p>396<br \/>\n00:18:44,399 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:50,220<br \/>\nfirst came up with this idea but today I<\/p>\n<p>397<br \/>\n00:18:47,999 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:52,139<br \/>\npretty much don&#8217;t have a problem I mean<\/p>\n<p>398<br \/>\n00:18:50,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:55,619<br \/>\nyou know like when if I want to scan<\/p>\n<p>399<br \/>\n00:18:52,139 &#8211;&gt; 00:18:58,700<br \/>\nsomething all of my my scanners and and<\/p>\n<p>400<br \/>\n00:18:55,619 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:01,919<br \/>\ndevices now have the ability to send a<\/p>\n<p>401<br \/>\n00:18:58,700 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:04,289<br \/>\nscan to a particular place and I just<\/p>\n<p>402<br \/>\n00:19:01,919 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:07,499<br \/>\nhave it auto set up to email it directly<\/p>\n<p>403<br \/>\n00:19:04,289 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:11,279<br \/>\nin to where it needs to go to or I email<\/p>\n<p>404<br \/>\n00:19:07,499 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:13,649<br \/>\nit to myself so if I scan up one of my<\/p>\n<p>405<br \/>\n00:19:11,279 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:15,869<br \/>\nmultifunction you know printers copy<\/p>\n<p>406<br \/>\n00:19:13,649 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:19,559<br \/>\ncopier scanner devices that&#8217;s that&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>407<br \/>\n00:19:15,869 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:23,249<br \/>\nalready kind of an easy one the the<\/p>\n<p>408<br \/>\n00:19:19,559 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:26,549<br \/>\nscanner I use is is designed to be able<\/p>\n<p>409<br \/>\n00:19:23,249 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:28,350<br \/>\nto direct things all automatically to<\/p>\n<p>410<br \/>\n00:19:26,549 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:30,600<br \/>\nwhere I want them to go so if it&#8217;s a<\/p>\n<p>411<br \/>\n00:19:28,350 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:32,940<br \/>\nreceipt it&#8217;s gonna go into my receipts<\/p>\n<p>412<br \/>\n00:19:30,600 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:35,869<br \/>\nnotebook within Evernote and sones<\/p>\n<p>413<br \/>\n00:19:32,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:38,840<br \/>\nafford so that&#8217;s kind of a non-issue<\/p>\n<p>414<br \/>\n00:19:35,869 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:42,090<br \/>\nregarding the the mail scanning I<\/p>\n<p>415<br \/>\n00:19:38,840 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:44,309<br \/>\ntotally hear you art however the US<\/p>\n<p>416<br \/>\n00:19:42,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:45,950<br \/>\nPostal Service scans everything anyway I<\/p>\n<p>417<br \/>\n00:19:44,309 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:48,570<br \/>\nmean they&#8217;re looking at everything<\/p>\n<p>418<br \/>\n00:19:45,950 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:50,070<br \/>\npurely for security purposes making sure<\/p>\n<p>419<br \/>\n00:19:48,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:52,379<br \/>\nthat you know there is an anthrax in<\/p>\n<p>420<br \/>\n00:19:50,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:54,330<br \/>\nyour mail and so and so forth so that&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>421<br \/>\n00:19:52,379 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:57,600<br \/>\nkind of computerized so I you know not<\/p>\n<p>422<br \/>\n00:19:54,330 &#8211;&gt; 00:19:59,190<br \/>\nparticularly a bad thing but the but the<\/p>\n<p>423<br \/>\n00:19:57,600 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:02,540<br \/>\nservice that I&#8217;ve been using earth class<\/p>\n<p>424<br \/>\n00:19:59,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:03,920<br \/>\nmail I trust them I haven&#8217;t you know<\/p>\n<p>425<br \/>\n00:20:02,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:07,630<br \/>\nit&#8217;s not like I&#8217;m reading I&#8217;m getting<\/p>\n<p>426<br \/>\n00:20:03,920 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:10,220<br \/>\nanything in my mail that I feel like is<\/p>\n<p>427<br \/>\n00:20:07,630 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:12,850<br \/>\nultimately to private and again it&#8217;s you<\/p>\n<p>428<br \/>\n00:20:10,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:15,860<br \/>\nknow most of what&#8217;s being done is<\/p>\n<p>429<br \/>\n00:20:12,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:17,870<br \/>\nautomated so it&#8217;s not like I&#8217;m someone&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>430<br \/>\n00:20:15,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:22,100<br \/>\nsitting around reading my Christmas<\/p>\n<p>431<br \/>\n00:20:17,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:25,640<br \/>\nletters one of the things I also think<\/p>\n<p>432<br \/>\n00:20:22,100 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:31,730<br \/>\ntrips this up is the segmentation and<\/p>\n<p>433<br \/>\n00:20:25,640 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:33,680<br \/>\nthe separation between work and personal<\/p>\n<p>434<br \/>\n00:20:31,730 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:35,540<br \/>\nespecially if you&#8217;re working in a<\/p>\n<p>435<br \/>\n00:20:33,680 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:37,810<br \/>\ncorporate environment because then you<\/p>\n<p>436<br \/>\n00:20:35,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:43,540<br \/>\ndon&#8217;t really have the latitude to<\/p>\n<p>437<br \/>\n00:20:37,810 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:47,140<br \/>\nintegrate the two systems together no I<\/p>\n<p>438<br \/>\n00:20:43,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:50,240<br \/>\ndon&#8217;t want to necessarily bring the gear<\/p>\n<p>439<br \/>\n00:20:47,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:53,840<br \/>\nconversation but I think the gear need<\/p>\n<p>440<br \/>\n00:20:50,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:20:56,540<br \/>\nto be mentioned too because one of the<\/p>\n<p>441<br \/>\n00:20:53,840 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:00,860<br \/>\nthings that used to be different when<\/p>\n<p>442<br \/>\n00:20:56,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:05,690<br \/>\nall this inbox zero conversation came is<\/p>\n<p>443<br \/>\n00:21:00,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:12,050<br \/>\nfor most people email at work happen at<\/p>\n<p>444<br \/>\n00:21:05,690 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:14,750<br \/>\nwork you know it&#8217;s there was no you know<\/p>\n<p>445<br \/>\n00:21:12,050 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:16,760<br \/>\nthat that thing that we seen today that<\/p>\n<p>446<br \/>\n00:21:14,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:20,240<br \/>\nconnectivity or that level of<\/p>\n<p>447<br \/>\n00:21:16,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:23,500<br \/>\nconnectivity that we have where most<\/p>\n<p>448<br \/>\n00:21:20,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:26,810<br \/>\npeople has access to their email<\/p>\n<p>449<br \/>\n00:21:23,500 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:28,820<br \/>\neverywhere and their computers are going<\/p>\n<p>450<br \/>\n00:21:26,810 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:31,940<br \/>\nwith they&#8217;re everywhere<\/p>\n<p>451<br \/>\n00:21:28,820 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:35,630<br \/>\nit wasn&#8217;t necessarily true at that time<\/p>\n<p>452<br \/>\n00:21:31,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:38,180<br \/>\nokay and and even that inbox here oh<\/p>\n<p>453<br \/>\n00:21:35,630 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:39,560<br \/>\nit&#8217;s not all about email email it&#8217;s a<\/p>\n<p>454<br \/>\n00:21:38,180 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:41,840<br \/>\nbig factor in here<\/p>\n<p>455<br \/>\n00:21:39,560 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:44,840<br \/>\nmostly because it&#8217;s the biggest host<\/p>\n<p>456<br \/>\n00:21:41,840 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:46,760<br \/>\nmost people have their actual bigger one<\/p>\n<p>457<br \/>\n00:21:44,840 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:49,160<br \/>\nthat people don&#8217;t notice is text<\/p>\n<p>458<br \/>\n00:21:46,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:52,580<br \/>\nmessages okay<\/p>\n<p>459<br \/>\n00:21:49,160 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:54,950<br \/>\nused to be email I think now people get<\/p>\n<p>460<br \/>\n00:21:52,580 &#8211;&gt; 00:21:57,380<br \/>\nmore input via text message and it&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>461<br \/>\n00:21:54,950 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:01,460<br \/>\neven more ignored than what email was<\/p>\n<p>462<br \/>\n00:21:57,380 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:04,370<br \/>\nbut then comes the hardware issue it<\/p>\n<p>463<br \/>\n00:22:01,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:07,610<br \/>\nused to be that you know you may get<\/p>\n<p>464<br \/>\n00:22:04,370 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:11,140<br \/>\nemail on a home computer and you may get<\/p>\n<p>465<br \/>\n00:22:07,610 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:13,600<br \/>\nemail on a work computer and they never<\/p>\n<p>466<br \/>\n00:22:11,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:17,020<br \/>\nnecessarily mix and match<\/p>\n<p>467<br \/>\n00:22:13,600 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:20,560<br \/>\nfor most people these days their main<\/p>\n<p>468<br \/>\n00:22:17,020 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:24,790<br \/>\nmachine is their iPhone or Android phone<\/p>\n<p>469<br \/>\n00:22:20,560 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:27,490<br \/>\nor mobile phone okay and on there for<\/p>\n<p>470<br \/>\n00:22:24,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:30,070<br \/>\nmost people do you get personal do you<\/p>\n<p>471<br \/>\n00:22:27,490 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:34,360<br \/>\nget text messages you get work and you<\/p>\n<p>472<br \/>\n00:22:30,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:37,210<br \/>\nget everything else and that comes to<\/p>\n<p>473<br \/>\n00:22:34,360 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:41,260<br \/>\nthe problem of how good can you manage<\/p>\n<p>474<br \/>\n00:22:37,210 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:44,080<br \/>\nand process all that in that device I&#8217;ve<\/p>\n<p>475<br \/>\n00:22:41,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:46,990<br \/>\nbeen arguing over the years that people<\/p>\n<p>476<br \/>\n00:22:44,080 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:49,240<br \/>\nshould have stopped checking email on<\/p>\n<p>477<br \/>\n00:22:46,990 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:52,330<br \/>\ntheir iPhone and or their phone mobile<\/p>\n<p>478<br \/>\n00:22:49,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:55,300<br \/>\nphone okay and mostly because people do<\/p>\n<p>479<br \/>\n00:22:52,330 &#8211;&gt; 00:22:58,750<br \/>\nnot have the ability the knowledge or<\/p>\n<p>480<br \/>\n00:22:55,300 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:00,640<br \/>\nthe technique to process in the same way<\/p>\n<p>481<br \/>\n00:22:58,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:03,610<br \/>\nthey will do it on their own machine so<\/p>\n<p>482<br \/>\n00:23:00,640 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:08,110<br \/>\nwhat that does is you look at email on<\/p>\n<p>483<br \/>\n00:23:03,610 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:11,020<br \/>\nyour phone okay you try to move fires<\/p>\n<p>484<br \/>\n00:23:08,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:13,690<br \/>\naway and then get back to your computer<\/p>\n<p>485<br \/>\n00:23:11,020 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:15,580<br \/>\nand then reprocess email by the way if<\/p>\n<p>486<br \/>\n00:23:13,690 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:17,560<br \/>\nyour main machine is not a tablet and<\/p>\n<p>487<br \/>\n00:23:15,580 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:20,580<br \/>\nyou are not processing email on the<\/p>\n<p>488<br \/>\n00:23:17,560 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:23,680<br \/>\ntablet that works exactly the same way<\/p>\n<p>489<br \/>\n00:23:20,580 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:25,750<br \/>\nin conjunction to that people is getting<\/p>\n<p>490<br \/>\n00:23:23,680 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:27,970<br \/>\non their phones you know now they&#8217;re<\/p>\n<p>491<br \/>\n00:23:25,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:31,570<br \/>\nusing them as a scanners taking pictures<\/p>\n<p>492<br \/>\n00:23:27,970 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:34,030<br \/>\nof stuff they want to remember and they<\/p>\n<p>493<br \/>\n00:23:31,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:37,800<br \/>\nare getting a bunch of text messages<\/p>\n<p>494<br \/>\n00:23:34,030 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:41,940<br \/>\nthat it is input is part of that inbox<\/p>\n<p>495<br \/>\n00:23:37,800 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:48,910<br \/>\nbut in many many many cases is simply<\/p>\n<p>496<br \/>\n00:23:41,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:51,040<br \/>\nsuper poorly processed so again I did<\/p>\n<p>497<br \/>\n00:23:48,910 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:53,440<br \/>\nnot wanted to bring the hard word into<\/p>\n<p>498<br \/>\n00:23:51,040 &#8211;&gt; 00:23:56,470<br \/>\ninto this but I think one of the things<\/p>\n<p>499<br \/>\n00:23:53,440 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:01,780<br \/>\nthat was not a reality when inbox hero<\/p>\n<p>500<br \/>\n00:23:56,470 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:05,710<br \/>\ntalk came out is how much hard word has<\/p>\n<p>501<br \/>\n00:24:01,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:08,830<br \/>\nchanged and the new hardware the new<\/p>\n<p>502<br \/>\n00:24:05,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:12,400<br \/>\naccessibility of hardware has made for<\/p>\n<p>503<br \/>\n00:24:08,830 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:18,640<br \/>\npeople even harder to reach this inbox<\/p>\n<p>504<br \/>\n00:24:12,400 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:22,270<br \/>\nhero to really process because a lot of<\/p>\n<p>505<br \/>\n00:24:18,640 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:27,960<br \/>\nthat input now is hiding is invisible<\/p>\n<p>506<br \/>\n00:24:22,270 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:27,960<br \/>\nand it is on most people&#8217;s mobile phone<\/p>\n<p>507<br \/>\n00:24:28,049 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:33,269<br \/>\njust to give context to what you&#8217;re<\/p>\n<p>508<br \/>\n00:24:30,279 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:36,070<br \/>\ntalking about it gusto is that the<\/p>\n<p>509<br \/>\n00:24:33,269 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:40,539<br \/>\nconcept of inbox zero came out a month<\/p>\n<p>510<br \/>\n00:24:36,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:43,690<br \/>\nor at least Merlin man&#8217;s talk at Google<\/p>\n<p>511<br \/>\n00:24:40,539 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:45,999<br \/>\ncame out a month after the iPhone was<\/p>\n<p>512<br \/>\n00:24:43,690 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:48,609<br \/>\nreleased so up until that point people<\/p>\n<p>513<br \/>\n00:24:45,999 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:51,460<br \/>\ndid have access to email on their on<\/p>\n<p>514<br \/>\n00:24:48,609 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:55,330<br \/>\ntheir mobile devices but those are very<\/p>\n<p>515<br \/>\n00:24:51,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:57,129<br \/>\nvery few people you know it was IIIi<\/p>\n<p>516<br \/>\n00:24:55,330 &#8211;&gt; 00:24:59,320<br \/>\nthink you might agree with me maybe you<\/p>\n<p>517<br \/>\n00:24:57,129 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:02,649<br \/>\ndon&#8217;t agree with me but this was a<\/p>\n<p>518<br \/>\n00:24:59,320 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:04,419<br \/>\nprobably small population of of people<\/p>\n<p>519<br \/>\n00:25:02,649 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:07,929<br \/>\nwho have access to email on their phones<\/p>\n<p>520<br \/>\n00:25:04,419 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:09,820<br \/>\nand now today almost everybody accesses<\/p>\n<p>521<br \/>\n00:25:07,929 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:13,359<br \/>\nemail from their phones so that&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>522<br \/>\n00:25:09,820 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:17,049<br \/>\nexactly my point yes before I before<\/p>\n<p>523<br \/>\n00:25:13,359 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:19,629<br \/>\nthat point okay email I mean the trio&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>524<br \/>\n00:25:17,049 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:21,999<br \/>\nwere able to get some emails but it<\/p>\n<p>525<br \/>\n00:25:19,629 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:24,100<br \/>\nwasn&#8217;t really effective okay people were<\/p>\n<p>526<br \/>\n00:25:21,999 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:25,869<br \/>\nreally doing email on their phone were<\/p>\n<p>527<br \/>\n00:25:24,100 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:28,210<br \/>\nthey blackberry or the crack barriers<\/p>\n<p>528<br \/>\n00:25:25,869 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:30,489<br \/>\nwas what&#8217;s called at that time they<\/p>\n<p>529<br \/>\n00:25:28,210 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:33,820<br \/>\ncracked bury people guilty as charged<\/p>\n<p>530<br \/>\n00:25:30,489 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:37,330<br \/>\nyeah it was the CrackBerry people but<\/p>\n<p>531<br \/>\n00:25:33,820 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:41,139<br \/>\nbut if you think about it also at that<\/p>\n<p>532<br \/>\n00:25:37,330 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:43,869<br \/>\ntime the amount of text messages that<\/p>\n<p>533<br \/>\n00:25:41,139 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:46,450<br \/>\npeople were receiving were really really<\/p>\n<p>534<br \/>\n00:25:43,869 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:48,549<br \/>\nlow the cameras on some of those phones<\/p>\n<p>535<br \/>\n00:25:46,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:51,249<br \/>\non even most blackberries did not have a<\/p>\n<p>536<br \/>\n00:25:48,549 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:54,999<br \/>\ncamera because they were aim off on a<\/p>\n<p>537<br \/>\n00:25:51,249 &#8211;&gt; 00:25:56,850<br \/>\ntime where IT control a lot of the<\/p>\n<p>538<br \/>\n00:25:54,999 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:00,549<br \/>\nthings and the cameras were I know No<\/p>\n<p>539<br \/>\n00:25:56,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:02,889<br \/>\nokay so you even the people on the<\/p>\n<p>540<br \/>\n00:26:00,549 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:04,450<br \/>\nblackberries they could read the email<\/p>\n<p>541<br \/>\n00:26:02,889 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:06,190<br \/>\nthey could reply they even maybe<\/p>\n<p>542<br \/>\n00:26:04,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:09,700<br \/>\norganized the email but that was the<\/p>\n<p>543<br \/>\n00:26:06,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:12,070<br \/>\nonly input or the principal domain input<\/p>\n<p>544<br \/>\n00:26:09,700 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:14,590<br \/>\nthey were getting at that time even when<\/p>\n<p>545<br \/>\n00:26:12,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:18,450<br \/>\nthis talk came out when the iPhone came<\/p>\n<p>546<br \/>\n00:26:14,590 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:22,570<br \/>\nout took a little bit time to get into<\/p>\n<p>547<br \/>\n00:26:18,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:24,940<br \/>\nthat crazy world of texting back and<\/p>\n<p>548<br \/>\n00:26:22,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:27,480<br \/>\nforward it was really limited to a group<\/p>\n<p>549<br \/>\n00:26:24,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:29,980<br \/>\nof people so it was not a mainstream<\/p>\n<p>550<br \/>\n00:26:27,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:32,379<br \/>\nproblem you know and let me remind you<\/p>\n<p>551<br \/>\n00:26:29,980 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:36,399<br \/>\nthat at that time is you want to say you<\/p>\n<p>552<br \/>\n00:26:32,379 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:38,799<br \/>\nknow take a hike you need to hit the<\/p>\n<p>553<br \/>\n00:26:36,399 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:39,940<br \/>\nnumber seven four times so you get to<\/p>\n<p>554<br \/>\n00:26:38,799 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:43,649<br \/>\nthe letter T<\/p>\n<p>555<br \/>\n00:26:39,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:47,080<br \/>\nit wasn&#8217;t simple to send a text message<\/p>\n<p>556<br \/>\n00:26:43,649 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:49,149<br \/>\nokay I remember those days you know<\/p>\n<p>557<br \/>\n00:26:47,080 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:51,220<br \/>\nwhere do these seven seventy seven one<\/p>\n<p>558<br \/>\n00:26:49,149 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:54,279<br \/>\nseven seven seven oh I made a mistake<\/p>\n<p>559<br \/>\n00:26:51,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:56,529<br \/>\ndelete it wasn&#8217;t simple it was not what<\/p>\n<p>560<br \/>\n00:26:54,279 &#8211;&gt; 00:26:59,679<br \/>\nit is right now even the same thing was<\/p>\n<p>561<br \/>\n00:26:56,529 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:01,750<br \/>\nan email yeah you know even the<\/p>\n<p>562<br \/>\n00:26:59,679 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:05,909<br \/>\nBlackBerry people that was hurt the<\/p>\n<p>563<br \/>\n00:27:01,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:08,980<br \/>\ninput I understand but you had one<\/p>\n<p>564<br \/>\n00:27:05,909 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:15,330<br \/>\nelement coming into that blackberry thin<\/p>\n<p>565<br \/>\n00:27:08,980 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:19,330<br \/>\nnow crap smartphone for most people and<\/p>\n<p>566<br \/>\n00:27:15,330 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:21,850<br \/>\nyou know this everything is in there you<\/p>\n<p>567<br \/>\n00:27:19,330 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:26,200<br \/>\nknow that is scary proposition how<\/p>\n<p>568<br \/>\n00:27:21,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:29,639<br \/>\nlittle people understand how much is on<\/p>\n<p>569<br \/>\n00:27:26,200 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:34,600<br \/>\ntheir mobile phones and how little<\/p>\n<p>570<br \/>\n00:27:29,639 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:37,139<br \/>\nsecurity they have around it but I think<\/p>\n<p>571<br \/>\n00:27:34,600 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:39,730<br \/>\nthat the there&#8217;s a first there&#8217;s a basic<\/p>\n<p>572<br \/>\n00:27:37,139 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:41,409<br \/>\nsort of first principle at play here<\/p>\n<p>573<br \/>\n00:27:39,730 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:45,789<br \/>\nwhich we can a touchdown in the last<\/p>\n<p>574<br \/>\n00:27:41,409 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:48,129<br \/>\ncall on on having multiple inboxes I<\/p>\n<p>575<br \/>\n00:27:45,789 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:50,850<br \/>\nthink that when you set an inbox up<\/p>\n<p>576<br \/>\n00:27:48,129 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:55,899<br \/>\nyou&#8217;re inviting the world to send you<\/p>\n<p>577<br \/>\n00:27:50,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:27:59,679<br \/>\ndata and so that data involves triggers<\/p>\n<p>578<br \/>\n00:27:55,899 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:01,389<br \/>\nthat then lead you to create tasks so<\/p>\n<p>579<br \/>\n00:27:59,679 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:04,870<br \/>\njust from a tasks point of view all<\/p>\n<p>580<br \/>\n00:28:01,389 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:07,200<br \/>\nthese different call them in boxes or<\/p>\n<p>581<br \/>\n00:28:04,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:09,360<br \/>\ndirect messages please as you collect<\/p>\n<p>582<br \/>\n00:28:07,200 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:12,279<br \/>\nfeedback on your wall on Facebook<\/p>\n<p>583<br \/>\n00:28:09,360 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:13,690<br \/>\nthey&#8217;re all from a task point of view<\/p>\n<p>584<br \/>\n00:28:12,279 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:15,759<br \/>\nthey&#8217;re all performing the same function<\/p>\n<p>585<br \/>\n00:28:13,690 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:18,370<br \/>\nwhich is that they&#8217;re your interface to<\/p>\n<p>586<br \/>\n00:28:15,759 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:19,210<br \/>\nthe outside world or people can send you<\/p>\n<p>587<br \/>\n00:28:18,370 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:21,759<br \/>\nanything they want<\/p>\n<p>588<br \/>\n00:28:19,210 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:24,549<br \/>\nand although the stuff that they send<\/p>\n<p>589<br \/>\n00:28:21,759 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:27,190<br \/>\nyou some of it triggers tasks so the<\/p>\n<p>590<br \/>\n00:28:24,549 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:30,789<br \/>\nquestion is how do you effectively pull<\/p>\n<p>591<br \/>\n00:28:27,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:32,740<br \/>\nall of these locations so that you can<\/p>\n<p>592<br \/>\n00:28:30,789 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:34,570<br \/>\nfigure out the triggers from the non<\/p>\n<p>593<br \/>\n00:28:32,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:37,509<br \/>\ntriggers or the signals from the noise<\/p>\n<p>594<br \/>\n00:28:34,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:41,259<br \/>\nand I think your concept of in inbox one<\/p>\n<p>595<br \/>\n00:28:37,509 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:43,149<br \/>\nis right on the money in that we&#8217;ve we<\/p>\n<p>596<br \/>\n00:28:41,259 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:45,669<br \/>\nhave all these different places now on<\/p>\n<p>597<br \/>\n00:28:43,149 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:48,129<br \/>\nthe internet and inboxes that some apps<\/p>\n<p>598<br \/>\n00:28:45,669 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:50,019<br \/>\ngive us that we don&#8217;t even want we have<\/p>\n<p>599<br \/>\n00:28:48,129 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:53,289<br \/>\nsocial networking and of course we have<\/p>\n<p>600<br \/>\n00:28:50,019 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:53,920<br \/>\nregular traditional email but they all<\/p>\n<p>601<br \/>\n00:28:53,289 &#8211;&gt; 00:28:56,560<br \/>\nare function<\/p>\n<p>602<br \/>\n00:28:53,920 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:00,700<br \/>\nin the same way and if we can bring them<\/p>\n<p>603<br \/>\n00:28:56,560 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:05,760<br \/>\ninto a single location so when I first<\/p>\n<p>604<br \/>\n00:29:00,700 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:07,750<br \/>\nstarted using Android and Android<\/p>\n<p>605<br \/>\n00:29:05,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:10,020<br \/>\nsmartphone I was really happy because I<\/p>\n<p>606<br \/>\n00:29:07,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:13,420<br \/>\ncould bring out bring in many of these<\/p>\n<p>607<br \/>\n00:29:10,020 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:14,920<br \/>\ninboxes or locations into one and it<\/p>\n<p>608<br \/>\n00:29:13,420 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:16,990<br \/>\nalthough it couldn&#8217;t I couldn&#8217;t bring it<\/p>\n<p>609<br \/>\n00:29:14,920 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:19,180<br \/>\ninto one software which I really wanted<\/p>\n<p>610<br \/>\n00:29:16,990 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:21,340<br \/>\nI at least had it in one physical<\/p>\n<p>611<br \/>\n00:29:19,180 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:23,230<br \/>\nlocation which was my smartphone and<\/p>\n<p>612<br \/>\n00:29:21,340 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:26,110<br \/>\nthat could travel with me that was a<\/p>\n<p>613<br \/>\n00:29:23,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:27,610<br \/>\nhuge huge huge difference a huge benefit<\/p>\n<p>614<br \/>\n00:29:26,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:30,250<br \/>\ncompared to what I had before which was<\/p>\n<p>615<br \/>\n00:29:27,610 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:31,780<br \/>\nstuff scattered on different devices so<\/p>\n<p>616<br \/>\n00:29:30,250 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:33,670<br \/>\nI think you&#8217;re right on the money and<\/p>\n<p>617<br \/>\n00:29:31,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:35,830<br \/>\nthe the reason you&#8217;re on the money I<\/p>\n<p>618<br \/>\n00:29:33,670 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:39,340<br \/>\nthink is because you want to bring as<\/p>\n<p>619<br \/>\n00:29:35,830 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:41,710<br \/>\nmany potential triggers for tasks into a<\/p>\n<p>620<br \/>\n00:29:39,340 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:44,830<br \/>\nsingle location so that you can process<\/p>\n<p>621<br \/>\n00:29:41,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:48,040<br \/>\nall of them in one go because the worst<\/p>\n<p>622<br \/>\n00:29:44,830 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:49,750<br \/>\nthing to have is to have some location<\/p>\n<p>623<br \/>\n00:29:48,040 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:52,960<br \/>\nsome inbox hanging out there somewhere<\/p>\n<p>624<br \/>\n00:29:49,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:55,480<br \/>\nwhich is collecting triggers which<\/p>\n<p>625<br \/>\n00:29:52,960 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:56,650<br \/>\nshould be turned into tasks but because<\/p>\n<p>626<br \/>\n00:29:55,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:29:58,780<br \/>\nthey&#8217;re remote<\/p>\n<p>627<br \/>\n00:29:56,650 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:02,230<br \/>\nyou&#8217;re not checking them as religiously<\/p>\n<p>628<br \/>\n00:29:58,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:04,000<br \/>\nor as discipline the fashion or whatever<\/p>\n<p>629<br \/>\n00:30:02,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:05,650<br \/>\nit might be which could lead to a<\/p>\n<p>630<br \/>\n00:30:04,000 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:07,750<br \/>\ntragedy which means that there&#8217;s some<\/p>\n<p>631<br \/>\n00:30:05,650 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:10,210<br \/>\nsome measures coming in that should<\/p>\n<p>632<br \/>\n00:30:07,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:13,570<br \/>\ntrigger a task that you&#8217;re not actually<\/p>\n<p>633<br \/>\n00:30:10,210 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:17,320<br \/>\ncatching so there&#8217;s a discipline to so<\/p>\n<p>634<br \/>\n00:30:13,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:20,260<br \/>\nso bringing all of these different<\/p>\n<p>635<br \/>\n00:30:17,320 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:22,000<br \/>\nlocations into one I think I&#8217;m sort of<\/p>\n<p>636<br \/>\n00:30:20,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:24,250<br \/>\ngusto was talking about which is if you<\/p>\n<p>637<br \/>\n00:30:22,000 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:27,070<br \/>\ncan be disciplined and check all of them<\/p>\n<p>638<br \/>\n00:30:24,250 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:29,230<br \/>\nthen you&#8217;re fine however most of us have<\/p>\n<p>639<br \/>\n00:30:27,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:31,420<br \/>\na very difficult time given that they&#8217;re<\/p>\n<p>640<br \/>\n00:30:29,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:34,840<br \/>\nscattered around or or ecosystems so we<\/p>\n<p>641<br \/>\n00:30:31,420 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:38,110<br \/>\nend up failing and then the last piece I<\/p>\n<p>642<br \/>\n00:30:34,840 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:40,060<br \/>\nthink is that some people get the idea<\/p>\n<p>643<br \/>\n00:30:38,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:42,700<br \/>\nof inbox zero all mixed up and<\/p>\n<p>644<br \/>\n00:30:40,060 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:44,740<br \/>\nespecially true today based on what a<\/p>\n<p>645<br \/>\n00:30:42,700 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:47,140<br \/>\nbooster just said which is they think<\/p>\n<p>646<br \/>\n00:30:44,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:50,380<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s skimming their inbox and leaving<\/p>\n<p>647<br \/>\n00:30:47,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:52,630<br \/>\nsome stuff behind is the way to go and<\/p>\n<p>648<br \/>\n00:30:50,380 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:55,450<br \/>\nwhen people inbox zero inbox they think<\/p>\n<p>649<br \/>\n00:30:52,630 &#8211;&gt; 00:30:58,390<br \/>\nit means as soon as a message comes in I<\/p>\n<p>650<br \/>\n00:30:55,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:01,390<br \/>\nneed to handle it immediately so they<\/p>\n<p>651<br \/>\n00:30:58,390 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:03,670<br \/>\nthey they they turn they&#8217;re all these<\/p>\n<p>652<br \/>\n00:31:01,390 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:05,530<br \/>\ndifferent inputs into places that they<\/p>\n<p>653<br \/>\n00:31:03,670 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:06,760<br \/>\nneed to keep checking and checking on<\/p>\n<p>654<br \/>\n00:31:05,530 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:07,990<br \/>\ncheck in and check in and check in and<\/p>\n<p>655<br \/>\n00:31:06,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:10,540<br \/>\nthe truth<\/p>\n<p>656<br \/>\n00:31:07,990 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:12,280<br \/>\nthey can never check enough so their<\/p>\n<p>657<br \/>\n00:31:10,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:14,980<br \/>\ntheir concept of inbox interior is<\/p>\n<p>658<br \/>\n00:31:12,280 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:17,800<br \/>\nincorrect the the proper concept if they<\/p>\n<p>659<br \/>\n00:31:14,980 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:21,340<br \/>\ncould follow inbox one is that they<\/p>\n<p>660<br \/>\n00:31:17,800 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:24,400<br \/>\ncould check all of them at one time<\/p>\n<p>661<br \/>\n00:31:21,340 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:26,260<br \/>\nempty them all down to zero and then<\/p>\n<p>662<br \/>\n00:31:24,400 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:29,140<br \/>\nmove on to actually do the work that&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>663<br \/>\n00:31:26,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:32,170<br \/>\nthe ultimate principle it&#8217;s just that we<\/p>\n<p>664<br \/>\n00:31:29,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:34,450<br \/>\ndon&#8217;t quite have the software or maybe<\/p>\n<p>665<br \/>\n00:31:32,170 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:37,540<br \/>\nthe hardware to allow us to do that<\/p>\n<p>666<br \/>\n00:31:34,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:39,250<br \/>\ndiscipline effectively I think if some<\/p>\n<p>667<br \/>\n00:31:37,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:41,320<br \/>\nreally salient points there Francis and<\/p>\n<p>668<br \/>\n00:31:39,250 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:43,420<br \/>\nI and I wanted to just add on one one<\/p>\n<p>669<br \/>\n00:31:41,320 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:46,120<br \/>\nmore thought that I had before we move<\/p>\n<p>670<br \/>\n00:31:43,420 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:49,780<br \/>\non to processing and clarifying email<\/p>\n<p>671<br \/>\n00:31:46,120 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:54,160<br \/>\nmessages which is that for those who who<\/p>\n<p>672<br \/>\n00:31:49,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:31:57,970<br \/>\nare part of your job is to respond to<\/p>\n<p>673<br \/>\n00:31:54,160 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:01,750<br \/>\nemail messages do not take what we&#8217;re<\/p>\n<p>674<br \/>\n00:31:57,970 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:05,170<br \/>\nsaying as one an opportunity to shirk<\/p>\n<p>675<br \/>\n00:32:01,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:08,770<br \/>\nyour role and responsibilities the other<\/p>\n<p>676<br \/>\n00:32:05,170 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:13,450<br \/>\nis that this may not work for you right<\/p>\n<p>677<br \/>\n00:32:08,770 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:16,690<br \/>\nbecause your concept of of how you<\/p>\n<p>678<br \/>\n00:32:13,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:18,490<br \/>\ntransit communications is different than<\/p>\n<p>679<br \/>\n00:32:16,690 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:20,860<br \/>\nother people you know when I when I was<\/p>\n<p>680<br \/>\n00:32:18,490 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:25,870<br \/>\nI was in I used to own a title agency<\/p>\n<p>681<br \/>\n00:32:20,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:30,820<br \/>\nand in that timeframe I had email coming<\/p>\n<p>682<br \/>\n00:32:25,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:33,100<br \/>\nin literally 24 hours a day and so there<\/p>\n<p>683<br \/>\n00:32:30,820 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:34,870<br \/>\nwas there was no concept of inbox zero<\/p>\n<p>684<br \/>\n00:32:33,100 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:36,130<br \/>\nfor me because there you know I could<\/p>\n<p>685<br \/>\n00:32:34,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:38,559<br \/>\nget it to zero but then immediately<\/p>\n<p>686<br \/>\n00:32:36,130 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:39,760<br \/>\nthereafter there were new email messages<\/p>\n<p>687<br \/>\n00:32:38,559 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:42,490<br \/>\ncoming in and I actually went to the<\/p>\n<p>688<br \/>\n00:32:39,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:45,280<br \/>\neffect of you know turning off my email<\/p>\n<p>689<br \/>\n00:32:42,490 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:48,429<br \/>\naccount my I&#8217;m sorry I turned off my<\/p>\n<p>690<br \/>\n00:32:45,280 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:52,360<br \/>\ninternet services at one point so that I<\/p>\n<p>691<br \/>\n00:32:48,429 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:55,059<br \/>\ncould get to zero get some stuff done<\/p>\n<p>692<br \/>\n00:32:52,360 &#8211;&gt; 00:32:56,890<br \/>\nand then turn my email back on at<\/p>\n<p>693<br \/>\n00:32:55,059 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:00,010<br \/>\ndifferent points in the day because it<\/p>\n<p>694<br \/>\n00:32:56,890 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:02,650<br \/>\nwas that kind of flow of email plus it<\/p>\n<p>695<br \/>\n00:33:00,010 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:05,650<br \/>\nwas my responsibility at that time to be<\/p>\n<p>696<br \/>\n00:33:02,650 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:07,179<br \/>\nhighly responsive to clients you know we<\/p>\n<p>697<br \/>\n00:33:05,650 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:09,850<br \/>\nhad real estate transactions happening<\/p>\n<p>698<br \/>\n00:33:07,179 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:12,370<br \/>\nall throughout the day and people were<\/p>\n<p>699<br \/>\n00:33:09,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:14,260<br \/>\ndepending upon us to be highly<\/p>\n<p>700<br \/>\n00:33:12,370 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:16,410<br \/>\nresponsive so if you need that in your<\/p>\n<p>701<br \/>\n00:33:14,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:19,590<br \/>\nwork world I totally get it<\/p>\n<p>702<br \/>\n00:33:16,410 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:21,470<br \/>\ntoday I do not have that it&#8217;s a very<\/p>\n<p>703<br \/>\n00:33:19,590 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:24,860<br \/>\ninfrequent I have a client<\/p>\n<p>704<br \/>\n00:33:21,470 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:27,440<br \/>\nthat needs me to drop everything and do<\/p>\n<p>705<br \/>\n00:33:24,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:29,510<br \/>\nsomething because of an email if that is<\/p>\n<p>706<br \/>\n00:33:27,440 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:31,630<br \/>\nthe case they should have called me<\/p>\n<p>707<br \/>\n00:33:29,510 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:34,460<br \/>\nright so there&#8217;s a there&#8217;s a real<\/p>\n<p>708<br \/>\n00:33:31,630 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:35,299<br \/>\nunderstanding in my world today that<\/p>\n<p>709<br \/>\n00:33:34,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:38,750<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s not quite the case<\/p>\n<p>710<br \/>\n00:33:35,299 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:42,260<br \/>\nI can sit down process email on really<\/p>\n<p>711<br \/>\n00:33:38,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:42,890<br \/>\nmy schedule and make that happen but if<\/p>\n<p>712<br \/>\n00:33:42,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:44,630<br \/>\nyour world<\/p>\n<p>713<br \/>\n00:33:42,890 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:47,270<br \/>\ndoes not allow for that understand you<\/p>\n<p>714<br \/>\n00:33:44,630 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:49,789<br \/>\nmust do what you need to do for your job<\/p>\n<p>715<br \/>\n00:33:47,270 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:52,429<br \/>\nfirst and foremost I had a client once<\/p>\n<p>716<br \/>\n00:33:49,789 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:54,470<br \/>\nwho they were in a similar situation so<\/p>\n<p>717<br \/>\n00:33:52,429 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:55,940<br \/>\nthe one you just described they had<\/p>\n<p>718<br \/>\n00:33:54,470 &#8211;&gt; 00:33:59,419<br \/>\nabout five people and they were getting<\/p>\n<p>719<br \/>\n00:33:55,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:01,640<br \/>\nemail from their clients and the emails<\/p>\n<p>720<br \/>\n00:33:59,419 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:04,549<br \/>\nwere coming in all day long and they<\/p>\n<p>721<br \/>\n00:34:01,640 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:06,530<br \/>\nwere being copied to all of them and as<\/p>\n<p>722<br \/>\n00:34:04,549 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:09,710<br \/>\nyou can imagine no one could afford to<\/p>\n<p>723<br \/>\n00:34:06,530 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:11,750<br \/>\nleave their inbox for unattended for<\/p>\n<p>724<br \/>\n00:34:09,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:14,090<br \/>\nmore than a few minutes so they all had<\/p>\n<p>725<br \/>\n00:34:11,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:15,260<br \/>\nall the alerts and pop-ups and you know<\/p>\n<p>726<br \/>\n00:34:14,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:16,790<br \/>\nall the things that you would expect<\/p>\n<p>727<br \/>\n00:34:15,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:19,520<br \/>\nthat would tell you that you have an<\/p>\n<p>728<br \/>\n00:34:16,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:20,810<br \/>\nemail coming in and that that the answer<\/p>\n<p>729<br \/>\n00:34:19,520 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:24,619<br \/>\nturned out to be pretty simple which is<\/p>\n<p>730<br \/>\n00:34:20,810 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:26,929<br \/>\nto put in a helpdesk form at triage with<\/p>\n<p>731<br \/>\n00:34:24,619 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:30,169<br \/>\nsome will have someone have someon or<\/p>\n<p>732<br \/>\n00:34:26,929 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:33,159<br \/>\nsome function manage all of the incoming<\/p>\n<p>733<br \/>\n00:34:30,169 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:36,980<br \/>\nemail whether it&#8217;s 24\/7 or whatever and<\/p>\n<p>734<br \/>\n00:34:33,159 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:41,540<br \/>\nthat person&#8217;s only job is to answer<\/p>\n<p>735<br \/>\n00:34:36,980 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:42,919<br \/>\nemail put them in order of preference<\/p>\n<p>736<br \/>\n00:34:41,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:45,349<br \/>\nnot preference but putting them some<\/p>\n<p>737<br \/>\n00:34:42,919 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:47,570<br \/>\nkind of priority and then transmit that<\/p>\n<p>738<br \/>\n00:34:45,349 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:50,540<br \/>\none who&#8217;s someone who can do something<\/p>\n<p>739<br \/>\n00:34:47,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:52,460<br \/>\nabout the problem of course I said it&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>740<br \/>\n00:34:50,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:55,220<br \/>\nalso it&#8217;s not a brand new solution by<\/p>\n<p>741<br \/>\n00:34:52,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:34:58,430<br \/>\nany means IT IT companies that be using<\/p>\n<p>742<br \/>\n00:34:55,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:00,349<br \/>\nit forever but it needs aptly it needs<\/p>\n<p>743<br \/>\n00:34:58,430 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:02,810<br \/>\nto the principal needs to be applied to<\/p>\n<p>744<br \/>\n00:35:00,349 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:04,760<br \/>\nother jobs where people are receiving<\/p>\n<p>745<br \/>\n00:35:02,810 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:07,640<br \/>\nemail in the way that you just described<\/p>\n<p>746<br \/>\n00:35:04,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:11,540<br \/>\nand that ultimately the experts be tied<\/p>\n<p>747<br \/>\n00:35:07,640 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:13,310<br \/>\nup answering every email unless they are<\/p>\n<p>748<br \/>\n00:35:11,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:14,930<br \/>\nthe helpdesk instead you need to put<\/p>\n<p>749<br \/>\n00:35:13,310 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:17,780<br \/>\nthis help their skin so that you can<\/p>\n<p>750<br \/>\n00:35:14,930 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:20,420<br \/>\nperform triage I would agree I would<\/p>\n<p>751<br \/>\n00:35:17,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:23,300<br \/>\nagree and so I&#8217;m gonna turn the<\/p>\n<p>752<br \/>\n00:35:20,420 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:25,160<br \/>\nconversation over now to processing<\/p>\n<p>753<br \/>\n00:35:23,300 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:27,200<br \/>\nemail messages and I&#8217;ll and I&#8217;ll start<\/p>\n<p>754<br \/>\n00:35:25,160 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:29,240<br \/>\noff and and then we can and then you all<\/p>\n<p>755<br \/>\n00:35:27,200 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:31,880<br \/>\ncan join in and give your thoughts here<\/p>\n<p>756<br \/>\n00:35:29,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:33,500<br \/>\nso when when it comes to processing<\/p>\n<p>757<br \/>\n00:35:31,880 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:35,090<br \/>\nemail messages I think there&#8217;s a there<\/p>\n<p>758<br \/>\n00:35:33,500 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:37,040<br \/>\nis something very<\/p>\n<p>759<br \/>\n00:35:35,090 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:39,950<br \/>\npowerful happening and it&#8217;s not<\/p>\n<p>760<br \/>\n00:35:37,040 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:43,610<br \/>\nnecessarily a good thing which is that<\/p>\n<p>761<br \/>\n00:35:39,950 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:48,410<br \/>\npeople have this innate need for novelty<\/p>\n<p>762<br \/>\n00:35:43,610 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:50,330<br \/>\nand and that has caused email to become<\/p>\n<p>763<br \/>\n00:35:48,410 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:52,850<br \/>\nthat little dopamine kick that we all<\/p>\n<p>764<br \/>\n00:35:50,330 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:55,400<br \/>\nget and we have this sense of what&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>765<br \/>\n00:35:52,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:35:58,010<br \/>\nbeen coined FOMO right fear of missing<\/p>\n<p>766<br \/>\n00:35:55,400 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:00,050<br \/>\nout and so we consistently keep checking<\/p>\n<p>767<br \/>\n00:35:58,010 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:03,710<br \/>\nour email messages in the hope of<\/p>\n<p>768<br \/>\n00:36:00,050 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:06,410<br \/>\nsomething new and novel and so what what<\/p>\n<p>769<br \/>\n00:36:03,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:07,910<br \/>\nI&#8217;ve done and and I think many others in<\/p>\n<p>770<br \/>\n00:36:06,410 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:09,830<br \/>\nthe productivity community have talked<\/p>\n<p>771<br \/>\n00:36:07,910 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:12,350<br \/>\nabout this before but a really powerful<\/p>\n<p>772<br \/>\n00:36:09,830 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:15,890<br \/>\nprocessing tool I&#8217;ve used is that I&#8217;ve<\/p>\n<p>773<br \/>\n00:36:12,350 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:19,730<br \/>\nactually inverted I&#8217;ve properly sorted<\/p>\n<p>774<br \/>\n00:36:15,890 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:22,910<br \/>\nmy email so that it shows up last at<\/p>\n<p>775<br \/>\n00:36:19,730 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:26,000<br \/>\nthough the oldest at the top of the of<\/p>\n<p>776<br \/>\n00:36:22,910 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:29,030<br \/>\nthe inbox but that makes sense so when a<\/p>\n<p>777<br \/>\n00:36:26,000 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:32,540<br \/>\nnew email comes in it shows up at the<\/p>\n<p>778<br \/>\n00:36:29,030 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:35,870<br \/>\nbottom of my email list so that I&#8217;m<\/p>\n<p>779<br \/>\n00:36:32,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:38,450<br \/>\nprocessing the oldest email first and<\/p>\n<p>780<br \/>\n00:36:35,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:42,520<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s really helped me because as I get<\/p>\n<p>781<br \/>\n00:36:38,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:47,030<br \/>\nto inbox zero you know throughout my day<\/p>\n<p>782<br \/>\n00:36:42,520 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:48,740<br \/>\nI&#8217;m or at least you know inbox less you<\/p>\n<p>783<br \/>\n00:36:47,030 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:51,530<br \/>\nknow and again I don&#8217;t get to inbox zero<\/p>\n<p>784<br \/>\n00:36:48,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:53,540<br \/>\nevery single day I try to I try to<\/p>\n<p>785<br \/>\n00:36:51,530 &#8211;&gt; 00:36:57,110<br \/>\nfollow David Allen&#8217;s principle of every<\/p>\n<p>786<br \/>\n00:36:53,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:00,890<br \/>\n24 to 48 hours and the idea is is that<\/p>\n<p>787<br \/>\n00:36:57,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:03,140<br \/>\nas that email comes in I&#8217;m not getting<\/p>\n<p>788<br \/>\n00:37:00,890 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:04,520<br \/>\nthat sense of oh that new thing just<\/p>\n<p>789<br \/>\n00:37:03,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:05,720<br \/>\npopped up at the top of the list I<\/p>\n<p>790<br \/>\n00:37:04,520 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:08,150<br \/>\nshould deal with that first<\/p>\n<p>791<br \/>\n00:37:05,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:09,830<br \/>\nit&#8217;s what&#8217;s what&#8217;s the stuff that&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>792<br \/>\n00:37:08,150 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:11,870<br \/>\nalready there that needs to be processed<\/p>\n<p>793<br \/>\n00:37:09,830 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:13,880<br \/>\nin the order it was received and to be<\/p>\n<p>794<br \/>\n00:37:11,870 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:16,940<br \/>\nquite honest that&#8217;s the most equitable<\/p>\n<p>795<br \/>\n00:37:13,880 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:17,510<br \/>\nright the the person who came to me<\/p>\n<p>796<br \/>\n00:37:16,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:19,640<br \/>\nfirst<\/p>\n<p>797<br \/>\n00:37:17,510 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:22,820<br \/>\nshould should should get first priority<\/p>\n<p>798<br \/>\n00:37:19,640 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:25,580<br \/>\nif it truly is first priority that&#8217;s a<\/p>\n<p>799<br \/>\n00:37:22,820 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:28,130<br \/>\nchoice I get to make but I shouldn&#8217;t I<\/p>\n<p>800<br \/>\n00:37:25,580 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:30,890<br \/>\nshouldn&#8217;t demote something just because<\/p>\n<p>801<br \/>\n00:37:28,130 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:35,360<br \/>\nit came in just now right the the<\/p>\n<p>802<br \/>\n00:37:30,890 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:37,730<br \/>\nimmediacy of it is not its priority how<\/p>\n<p>803<br \/>\n00:37:35,360 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:39,970<br \/>\nwould it with an emergency though they<\/p>\n<p>804<br \/>\n00:37:37,730 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:42,110<br \/>\nshould pick up the phone and call me<\/p>\n<p>805<br \/>\n00:37:39,970 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:44,960<br \/>\nI&#8217;m sorry that&#8217;s just not where an<\/p>\n<p>806<br \/>\n00:37:42,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:46,860<br \/>\nemergency you know communications happen<\/p>\n<p>807<br \/>\n00:37:44,960 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:49,170<br \/>\nright<\/p>\n<p>808<br \/>\n00:37:46,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:50,640<br \/>\nnow all right let me jump in here real<\/p>\n<p>809<br \/>\n00:37:49,170 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:53,240<br \/>\nquick because there&#8217;s something like I<\/p>\n<p>810<br \/>\n00:37:50,640 &#8211;&gt; 00:37:57,330<br \/>\nneed to make sure is clear when we say<\/p>\n<p>811<br \/>\n00:37:53,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:01,290<br \/>\nprocess correct me if I&#8217;m wrong we are<\/p>\n<p>812<br \/>\n00:37:57,330 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:03,450<br \/>\nnot saying that you take the email and<\/p>\n<p>813<br \/>\n00:38:01,290 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:05,040<br \/>\nyou do everything in it and it&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>814<br \/>\n00:38:03,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:06,410<br \/>\ncompletely finished and put away and<\/p>\n<p>815<br \/>\n00:38:05,040 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:09,210<br \/>\nnever touched again<\/p>\n<p>816<br \/>\n00:38:06,410 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:11,220<br \/>\ncorrect correct okay because we are on<\/p>\n<p>817<br \/>\n00:38:09,210 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:12,660<br \/>\nan agreement okay and I think that&#8217;s one<\/p>\n<p>818<br \/>\n00:38:11,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:14,900<br \/>\nof the things that causes some confusion<\/p>\n<p>819<br \/>\n00:38:12,660 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:19,380<br \/>\nwith people when when they think about<\/p>\n<p>820<br \/>\n00:38:14,900 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:21,180<br \/>\nprocessing emails what is the process I<\/p>\n<p>821<br \/>\n00:38:19,380 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:24,780<br \/>\nmean I build ticketing systems like<\/p>\n<p>822<br \/>\n00:38:21,180 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:28,290<br \/>\nFrances was talking about and the<\/p>\n<p>823<br \/>\n00:38:24,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:31,260<br \/>\nprocess of that first step that capture<\/p>\n<p>824<br \/>\n00:38:28,290 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:32,760<br \/>\nstep is probably the most important<\/p>\n<p>825<br \/>\n00:38:31,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:36,030<br \/>\nthing that you have to define for<\/p>\n<p>826<br \/>\n00:38:32,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:39,570<br \/>\nyourself what is the success state of<\/p>\n<p>827<br \/>\n00:38:36,030 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:41,940<br \/>\nsomething being processed is it done is<\/p>\n<p>828<br \/>\n00:38:39,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:44,580<br \/>\nit logged in another system is it put<\/p>\n<p>829<br \/>\n00:38:41,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:46,380<br \/>\ninto a folder you got to write those<\/p>\n<p>830<br \/>\n00:38:44,580 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:50,040<br \/>\nthings down someplace so that you can<\/p>\n<p>831<br \/>\n00:38:46,380 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:51,840<br \/>\nfollow that consistently because and I<\/p>\n<p>832<br \/>\n00:38:50,040 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:53,310<br \/>\nlike your idea this the sort and all it<\/p>\n<p>833<br \/>\n00:38:51,840 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:57,210<br \/>\nwouldn&#8217;t work in my inbox because mine&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>834<br \/>\n00:38:53,310 &#8211;&gt; 00:38:59,550<br \/>\na mess but if you have that process<\/p>\n<p>835<br \/>\n00:38:57,210 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:01,980<br \/>\nmechanism and you&#8217;ve defined it this is<\/p>\n<p>836<br \/>\n00:38:59,550 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:05,430<br \/>\nhow I&#8217;m going to handle these things as<\/p>\n<p>837<br \/>\n00:39:01,980 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:09,000<br \/>\nthey come through my process channel my<\/p>\n<p>838<br \/>\n00:39:05,430 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:10,680<br \/>\nflow then you can actually make sure<\/p>\n<p>839<br \/>\n00:39:09,000 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:13,110<br \/>\nthis is going to work but if you don&#8217;t<\/p>\n<p>840<br \/>\n00:39:10,680 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:15,810<br \/>\nsit down and write that down and and<\/p>\n<p>841<br \/>\n00:39:13,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:17,850<br \/>\nidentify each type of thing that&#8217;s going<\/p>\n<p>842<br \/>\n00:39:15,810 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:19,130<br \/>\nto be captured and how it&#8217;s going to be<\/p>\n<p>843<br \/>\n00:39:17,850 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:22,550<br \/>\nprocessed<\/p>\n<p>844<br \/>\n00:39:19,130 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:26,040<br \/>\nthis becomes a train wreck in a hurry<\/p>\n<p>845<br \/>\n00:39:22,550 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:28,740<br \/>\nyeah one time I was so complex at one<\/p>\n<p>846<br \/>\n00:39:26,040 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:31,890<br \/>\npoint that I needed to actually map out<\/p>\n<p>847<br \/>\n00:39:28,740 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:33,810<br \/>\na workflow diagram for how email was to<\/p>\n<p>848<br \/>\n00:39:31,890 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:36,180<br \/>\nbe processed for me you know what was<\/p>\n<p>849<br \/>\n00:39:33,810 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:38,280<br \/>\ngoing to be responded to immediately and<\/p>\n<p>850<br \/>\n00:39:36,180 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:41,760<br \/>\nwhat was going to be deferred to a next<\/p>\n<p>851<br \/>\n00:39:38,280 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:43,710<br \/>\nactions list for later processing right<\/p>\n<p>852<br \/>\n00:39:41,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:45,630<br \/>\nand I and I think everybody has to take<\/p>\n<p>853<br \/>\n00:39:43,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:46,530<br \/>\nthat and take that to heart so I think<\/p>\n<p>854<br \/>\n00:39:45,630 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:48,510<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s a good point<\/p>\n<p>855<br \/>\n00:39:46,530 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:51,930<br \/>\nyeah when I when I define things around<\/p>\n<p>856<br \/>\n00:39:48,510 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:55,200<br \/>\nthe CPR process that I use I think about<\/p>\n<p>857<br \/>\n00:39:51,930 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:57,120<br \/>\neach stage in this in this little game<\/p>\n<p>858<br \/>\n00:39:55,200 &#8211;&gt; 00:39:58,920<br \/>\nthat the email is going to run through<\/p>\n<p>859<br \/>\n00:39:57,120 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:00,780<br \/>\nlike the Plinko machines on the price is<\/p>\n<p>860<br \/>\n00:39:58,920 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:03,840<br \/>\nright it&#8217;s going to be captured<\/p>\n<p>861<br \/>\n00:40:00,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:06,990<br \/>\nwhat immediately I have to identify what<\/p>\n<p>862<br \/>\n00:40:03,840 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:09,690<br \/>\nthat thing is that came in is it act is<\/p>\n<p>863<br \/>\n00:40:06,990 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:11,400<br \/>\nit a task is it information is it<\/p>\n<p>864<br \/>\n00:40:09,690 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:14,190<br \/>\nsomething needing a response is it a<\/p>\n<p>865<br \/>\n00:40:11,400 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:16,860<br \/>\ncombination of those things then what&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>866<br \/>\n00:40:14,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:19,440<br \/>\nthe process that has to happen right<\/p>\n<p>867<br \/>\n00:40:16,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:21,540<br \/>\naway not to fully complete it but just<\/p>\n<p>868<br \/>\n00:40:19,440 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:23,790<br \/>\nto get at the heck out of the way of the<\/p>\n<p>869<br \/>\n00:40:21,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:27,060<br \/>\npriority work that has to be done and<\/p>\n<p>870<br \/>\n00:40:23,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:29,280<br \/>\nthen finally and this is again again one<\/p>\n<p>871<br \/>\n00:40:27,060 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:31,860<br \/>\nof those key things how is it going to<\/p>\n<p>872<br \/>\n00:40:29,280 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:33,840<br \/>\nbe reported back to me how am I going to<\/p>\n<p>873<br \/>\n00:40:31,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:36,450<br \/>\nbe able to go find that again when I<\/p>\n<p>874<br \/>\n00:40:33,840 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:37,110<br \/>\nneed it I mean when we think about the<\/p>\n<p>875<br \/>\n00:40:36,450 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:40,110<br \/>\nInbox<\/p>\n<p>876<br \/>\n00:40:37,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:41,550<br \/>\nif you&#8217;ve got 2,000 items in your inbox<\/p>\n<p>877<br \/>\n00:40:40,110 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:42,300<br \/>\nand they&#8217;ve all been read but they&#8217;re<\/p>\n<p>878<br \/>\n00:40:41,550 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:44,640<br \/>\nstill in there<\/p>\n<p>879<br \/>\n00:40:42,300 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:47,190<br \/>\nit isn&#8217;t any different than if you&#8217;ve<\/p>\n<p>880<br \/>\n00:40:44,640 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:49,350<br \/>\ngot 2,000 items spread across 40<\/p>\n<p>881<br \/>\n00:40:47,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:51,570<br \/>\ndifferent folders in subfolders under<\/p>\n<p>882<br \/>\n00:40:49,350 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:54,780<br \/>\nyour inbox if you don&#8217;t have a<\/p>\n<p>883<br \/>\n00:40:51,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:56,370<br \/>\ncomprehensive and cohesive way to look<\/p>\n<p>884<br \/>\n00:40:54,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:40:58,380<br \/>\nat what&#8217;s there and know that you can<\/p>\n<p>885<br \/>\n00:40:56,370 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:01,050<br \/>\nget the information back when you need<\/p>\n<p>886<br \/>\n00:40:58,380 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:02,940<br \/>\nit you might as well have not processed<\/p>\n<p>887<br \/>\n00:41:01,050 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:04,560<br \/>\nit in the first place because all you<\/p>\n<p>888<br \/>\n00:41:02,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:06,960<br \/>\ndid is you moved it to someplace else<\/p>\n<p>889<br \/>\n00:41:04,560 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:10,830<br \/>\nyou&#8217;re shuffling deck chairs on the<\/p>\n<p>890<br \/>\n00:41:06,960 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:13,260<br \/>\nTitanic at that point I think art brings<\/p>\n<p>891<br \/>\n00:41:10,830 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:15,840<br \/>\nup a good point which is that when you<\/p>\n<p>892<br \/>\n00:41:13,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:18,480<br \/>\nwhen you have the all of your messages<\/p>\n<p>893<br \/>\n00:41:15,840 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:20,460<br \/>\nin one inbox you&#8217;re able to have the<\/p>\n<p>894<br \/>\n00:41:18,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:22,650<br \/>\ninformation and the trigger in the same<\/p>\n<p>895<br \/>\n00:41:20,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:25,170<br \/>\nplace the trigger being the remainder or<\/p>\n<p>896<br \/>\n00:41:22,650 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:27,540<br \/>\nthey tracking mechanism when you like<\/p>\n<p>897<br \/>\n00:41:25,170 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:29,940<br \/>\nwhen you like when you when you start to<\/p>\n<p>898<br \/>\n00:41:27,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:32,400<br \/>\nshare the information out or put it all<\/p>\n<p>899<br \/>\n00:41:29,940 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:34,890<br \/>\ninto folders or in your desktop or in a<\/p>\n<p>900<br \/>\n00:41:32,400 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:37,320<br \/>\ndatabase somewhere you no need to learn<\/p>\n<p>901<br \/>\n00:41:34,890 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:39,240<br \/>\nhow to manage the trigger separately<\/p>\n<p>902<br \/>\n00:41:37,320 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:42,300<br \/>\nfrom the information because you&#8217;re<\/p>\n<p>903<br \/>\n00:41:39,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:45,240<br \/>\nyou&#8217;re not using the fact that you have<\/p>\n<p>904<br \/>\n00:41:42,300 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:47,250<br \/>\nthis line item in your inbox as the<\/p>\n<p>905<br \/>\n00:41:45,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:52,170<br \/>\nremain I think and I think and I think<\/p>\n<p>906<br \/>\n00:41:47,250 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:55,410<br \/>\npeople people people are afraid put it<\/p>\n<p>907<br \/>\n00:41:52,170 &#8211;&gt; 00:41:57,710<br \/>\nfrankly to follow sophisticated systems<\/p>\n<p>908<br \/>\n00:41:55,410 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:01,530<br \/>\nwhere they do zero inbox or inbox zero<\/p>\n<p>909<br \/>\n00:41:57,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:04,200<br \/>\nbecause they see that if I hide away<\/p>\n<p>910<br \/>\n00:42:01,530 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:07,200<br \/>\nthis information away from my inbox I<\/p>\n<p>911<br \/>\n00:42:04,200 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:10,010<br \/>\nalso lose the trigger in other words<\/p>\n<p>912<br \/>\n00:42:07,200 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:13,920<br \/>\nI&#8217;ll forget to go back and do the task<\/p>\n<p>913<br \/>\n00:42:10,010 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:14,490<br \/>\nso they they they they reject the<\/p>\n<p>914<br \/>\n00:42:13,920 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:16,560<br \/>\nrejected<\/p>\n<p>915<br \/>\n00:42:14,490 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:18,390<br \/>\nthey&#8217;re unable to do it or they try and<\/p>\n<p>916<br \/>\n00:42:16,560 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:21,359<br \/>\nthey fail or they argue that it won&#8217;t<\/p>\n<p>917<br \/>\n00:42:18,390 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:22,680<br \/>\nwork or whatever it is but all it is<\/p>\n<p>918<br \/>\n00:42:21,359 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:26,310<br \/>\nreally is that they need to train<\/p>\n<p>919<br \/>\n00:42:22,680 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:29,520<br \/>\nhimself to manage the task separate from<\/p>\n<p>920<br \/>\n00:42:26,310 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:32,130<br \/>\nthe data and not and and and allow<\/p>\n<p>921<br \/>\n00:42:29,520 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:36,270<br \/>\nthemselves to separate the two because<\/p>\n<p>922<br \/>\n00:42:32,130 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:39,140<br \/>\nas I was implying when you separate the<\/p>\n<p>923<br \/>\n00:42:36,270 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:40,609<br \/>\ntwo it increases your productivity<\/p>\n<p>924<br \/>\n00:42:39,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:44,220<br \/>\nTremaine<\/p>\n<p>925<br \/>\n00:42:40,609 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:47,580<br \/>\nTremaine tremendously it goes up by a<\/p>\n<p>926<br \/>\n00:42:44,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:49,290<br \/>\nfactor of ten a hundred a thousand but<\/p>\n<p>927<br \/>\n00:42:47,580 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:51,240<br \/>\nit&#8217;s a huge huge difference and if you<\/p>\n<p>928<br \/>\n00:42:49,290 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:54,210<br \/>\ncan have a trusted system for managing<\/p>\n<p>929<br \/>\n00:42:51,240 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:56,460<br \/>\nthe tasks and a trusted system for<\/p>\n<p>930<br \/>\n00:42:54,210 &#8211;&gt; 00:42:58,589<br \/>\nmanaging the information then you&#8217;re<\/p>\n<p>931<br \/>\n00:42:56,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:01,650<br \/>\ngood to go your your may be infinitely<\/p>\n<p>932<br \/>\n00:42:58,589 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:05,780<br \/>\nscalable who knows pay attention where<\/p>\n<p>933<br \/>\n00:43:01,650 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:05,780<br \/>\nthat information is coming and<\/p>\n<p>934<br \/>\n00:43:06,589 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:14,010<br \/>\nunderstand that process that doesn&#8217;t<\/p>\n<p>935<br \/>\n00:43:10,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:17,040<br \/>\nmean do that means receive it mean<\/p>\n<p>936<br \/>\n00:43:14,010 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:19,770<br \/>\nunderstand what is what you need to do<\/p>\n<p>937<br \/>\n00:43:17,040 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:21,900<br \/>\nabout it and then capture that somewhere<\/p>\n<p>938<br \/>\n00:43:19,770 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:24,930<br \/>\nthat you are actually going to come back<\/p>\n<p>939<br \/>\n00:43:21,900 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:33,030<br \/>\nand do it unfinish it and get it done<\/p>\n<p>940<br \/>\n00:43:24,930 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:36,180<br \/>\nokay um but also block time to do that<\/p>\n<p>941<br \/>\n00:43:33,030 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:39,920<br \/>\nyou know one of the problems a lot of<\/p>\n<p>942<br \/>\n00:43:36,180 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:42,780<br \/>\npeople have it&#8217;s not the amount of<\/p>\n<p>943<br \/>\n00:43:39,920 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:45,210<br \/>\ninputs they have the amount of input is<\/p>\n<p>944<br \/>\n00:43:42,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:47,780<br \/>\nnot going to change actually it&#8217;s going<\/p>\n<p>945<br \/>\n00:43:45,210 &#8211;&gt; 00:43:54,089<br \/>\nto be increasing okay<\/p>\n<p>946<br \/>\n00:43:47,780 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:00,150<br \/>\nbut most people have not built time into<\/p>\n<p>947<br \/>\n00:43:54,089 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:02,670<br \/>\ntheir daily responsibilities to process<\/p>\n<p>948<br \/>\n00:44:00,150 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:04,230<br \/>\nthat and I understand the time change<\/p>\n<p>949<br \/>\n00:44:02,670 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:06,630<br \/>\nand I understand there are days you need<\/p>\n<p>950<br \/>\n00:44:04,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:10,680<br \/>\nmore or less but you need to at least<\/p>\n<p>951<br \/>\n00:44:06,630 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:12,990<br \/>\nhave a set block time every day to<\/p>\n<p>952<br \/>\n00:44:10,680 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:15,119<br \/>\nprocess those that&#8217;s the only way you<\/p>\n<p>953<br \/>\n00:44:12,990 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:17,730<br \/>\nare going to get some kind of control<\/p>\n<p>954<br \/>\n00:44:15,119 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:22,770<br \/>\nand some hope to get close to zero as<\/p>\n<p>955<br \/>\n00:44:17,730 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:25,349<br \/>\nyou said do I get to see every day no do<\/p>\n<p>956<br \/>\n00:44:22,770 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:30,109<br \/>\nI wish yes but the reality is I have<\/p>\n<p>957<br \/>\n00:44:25,349 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:30,109<br \/>\ntime every day in my<\/p>\n<p>958<br \/>\n00:44:30,700 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:37,820<br \/>\ncalendar blocked just to process email<\/p>\n<p>959<br \/>\n00:44:34,369 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:41,000<br \/>\njust to process input just to process my<\/p>\n<p>960<br \/>\n00:44:37,820 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:44,599<br \/>\ninboxes why because if I don&#8217;t make that<\/p>\n<p>961<br \/>\n00:44:41,000 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:46,310<br \/>\ntime I will never had that is a priority<\/p>\n<p>962<br \/>\n00:44:44,599 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:50,420<br \/>\nand will never happen so it will not be<\/p>\n<p>963<br \/>\n00:44:46,310 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:52,730<br \/>\nevery 48 24 48 hours it will be never so<\/p>\n<p>964<br \/>\n00:44:50,420 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:56,119<br \/>\nmake sure that you have a time where<\/p>\n<p>965<br \/>\n00:44:52,730 &#8211;&gt; 00:44:58,760<br \/>\nthat happened so for example I tend to<\/p>\n<p>966<br \/>\n00:44:56,119 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:01,330<br \/>\nadvise people to take time Friday<\/p>\n<p>967<br \/>\n00:44:58,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:05,030<br \/>\nafternoon Friday afternoon tend to be a<\/p>\n<p>968<br \/>\n00:45:01,330 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:08,150<br \/>\nslow business time for most companies<\/p>\n<p>969<br \/>\n00:45:05,030 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:10,070<br \/>\nand most people then block at 3 p.m. to<\/p>\n<p>970<br \/>\n00:45:08,150 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:13,520<br \/>\nclean your inbox make it a calendar<\/p>\n<p>971<br \/>\n00:45:10,070 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:16,460<br \/>\nevent so you remember that you&#8217;re going<\/p>\n<p>972<br \/>\n00:45:13,520 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:20,119<br \/>\nto do that and sit at 3 p.m. and with<\/p>\n<p>973<br \/>\n00:45:16,460 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:23,570<br \/>\nthe goal to process to get as close as 0<\/p>\n<p>974<br \/>\n00:45:20,119 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:26,180<br \/>\nor at 0 if possible and make it a tree<\/p>\n<p>975<br \/>\n00:45:23,570 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:29,000<br \/>\nso that way hey if you are done by 4:00<\/p>\n<p>976<br \/>\n00:45:26,180 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:31,160<br \/>\nor 4:30 then now you can celebrate the<\/p>\n<p>977<br \/>\n00:45:29,000 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:33,710<br \/>\nother half an hour instead of put it at<\/p>\n<p>978<br \/>\n00:45:31,160 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:36,140<br \/>\n4:00 where you are going to be on the<\/p>\n<p>979<br \/>\n00:45:33,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:37,790<br \/>\ntime you&#8217;re ready to go home you know in<\/p>\n<p>980<br \/>\n00:45:36,140 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:41,420<br \/>\nthe middle of that process so buy<\/p>\n<p>981<br \/>\n00:45:37,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:44,060<br \/>\nyourself enough time to do that if you<\/p>\n<p>982<br \/>\n00:45:41,420 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:46,040<br \/>\nare going to do it that way if that<\/p>\n<p>983<br \/>\n00:45:44,060 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:49,220<br \/>\ndoesn&#8217;t work then at least try to find<\/p>\n<p>984<br \/>\n00:45:46,040 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:53,510<br \/>\ntime every day that you blog on your<\/p>\n<p>985<br \/>\n00:45:49,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:55,160<br \/>\ncalendar to do that and my advice is do<\/p>\n<p>986<br \/>\n00:45:53,510 &#8211;&gt; 00:45:57,530<br \/>\nnot do it the first thing in the morning<\/p>\n<p>987<br \/>\n00:45:55,160 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:00,920<br \/>\nit tend to work much better towards the<\/p>\n<p>988<br \/>\n00:45:57,530 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:03,230<br \/>\nend of the day as you are unwinding that<\/p>\n<p>989<br \/>\n00:46:00,920 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:05,210<br \/>\ntest towards the beginning of the day<\/p>\n<p>990<br \/>\n00:46:03,230 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:06,890<br \/>\nand the reason for that is you&#8217;re going<\/p>\n<p>991<br \/>\n00:46:05,210 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:10,010<br \/>\nto find an emergency and that is going<\/p>\n<p>992<br \/>\n00:46:06,890 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:13,910<br \/>\nto throw everything off for me I<\/p>\n<p>993<br \/>\n00:46:10,010 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:16,190<br \/>\nactually have four distinct times in my<\/p>\n<p>994<br \/>\n00:46:13,910 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:21,290<br \/>\nday that I&#8217;ve blocked out for processing<\/p>\n<p>995<br \/>\n00:46:16,190 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:24,349<br \/>\nemail and the tangent to that is that<\/p>\n<p>996<br \/>\n00:46:21,290 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:28,280<br \/>\nright next to that is time to actually<\/p>\n<p>997<br \/>\n00:46:24,349 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:32,030<br \/>\nprocess the task involves my task inbox<\/p>\n<p>998<br \/>\n00:46:28,280 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:34,099<br \/>\nfor email messages that are not just a<\/p>\n<p>999<br \/>\n00:46:32,030 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:35,990<br \/>\nread and reply<\/p>\n<p>1000<br \/>\n00:46:34,099 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:39,710<br \/>\nstyle email message right it needs<\/p>\n<p>1001<br \/>\n00:46:35,990 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:41,540<br \/>\nfurther than just I read it I processed<\/p>\n<p>1002<br \/>\n00:46:39,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:42,290<br \/>\nit I&#8217;ve made a decision or I have the<\/p>\n<p>1003<br \/>\n00:46:41,540 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:44,360<br \/>\ninformation<\/p>\n<p>1004<br \/>\n00:46:42,290 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:46,220<br \/>\nat the tip of my tongue to be able to<\/p>\n<p>1005<br \/>\n00:46:44,360 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:48,260<br \/>\nthen type and respond to that person I<\/p>\n<p>1006<br \/>\n00:46:46,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:50,330<br \/>\nnow need to put that into the task inbox<\/p>\n<p>1007<br \/>\n00:46:48,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:53,480<br \/>\nbecause it requires further processing I<\/p>\n<p>1008<br \/>\n00:46:50,330 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:55,610<br \/>\nalways leave more time to go to my task<\/p>\n<p>1009<br \/>\n00:46:53,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:46:57,860<br \/>\ninbox and make sure that&#8217;s processed<\/p>\n<p>1010<br \/>\n00:46:55,610 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:00,080<br \/>\nbecause again like I said at the top of<\/p>\n<p>1011<br \/>\n00:46:57,860 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:03,010<br \/>\nthe show it&#8217;s that&#8217;s more important to<\/p>\n<p>1012<br \/>\n00:47:00,080 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:05,000<br \/>\nme than the email the email is is<\/p>\n<p>1013<br \/>\n00:47:03,010 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:07,790<br \/>\ncommunication it&#8217;s like a conversation<\/p>\n<p>1014<br \/>\n00:47:05,000 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:10,760<br \/>\nwe&#8217;re having it&#8217;s not it&#8217;s not the stuff<\/p>\n<p>1015<br \/>\n00:47:07,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:13,430<br \/>\nI need to do right and so I need to make<\/p>\n<p>1016<br \/>\n00:47:10,760 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:15,710<br \/>\nsure that task inbox is actually that<\/p>\n<p>1017<br \/>\n00:47:13,430 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:17,630<br \/>\none being zeroed out is actually way<\/p>\n<p>1018<br \/>\n00:47:15,710 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:20,150<br \/>\nmore important to me so I actually pair<\/p>\n<p>1019<br \/>\n00:47:17,630 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:23,030<br \/>\nthose two together and and so I hope<\/p>\n<p>1020<br \/>\n00:47:20,150 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:24,830<br \/>\nthat helps folks I thank you gentlemen<\/p>\n<p>1021<br \/>\n00:47:23,030 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:26,900<br \/>\nfor this conversation this has been a<\/p>\n<p>1022<br \/>\n00:47:24,830 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:29,120<br \/>\nreally great topic and I think a really<\/p>\n<p>1023<br \/>\n00:47:26,900 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:32,300<br \/>\ngood show and I think that we&#8217;ll have<\/p>\n<p>1024<br \/>\n00:47:29,120 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:36,800<br \/>\nmore conversations about this concept of<\/p>\n<p>1025<br \/>\n00:47:32,300 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:39,770<br \/>\nof working with email in the future so<\/p>\n<p>1026<br \/>\n00:47:36,800 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:41,750<br \/>\nwith that do you have a question or<\/p>\n<p>1027<br \/>\n00:47:39,770 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:43,970<br \/>\ncomment about this episode something<\/p>\n<p>1028<br \/>\n00:47:41,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:46,010<br \/>\nthat we discussed in this episode or<\/p>\n<p>1029<br \/>\n00:47:43,970 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:48,950<br \/>\notherwise about personal productivity<\/p>\n<p>1030<br \/>\n00:47:46,010 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:50,720<br \/>\nplease visit productivity cast dotnet<\/p>\n<p>1031<br \/>\n00:47:48,950 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:53,720<br \/>\nforward slash contact and let us know<\/p>\n<p>1032<br \/>\n00:47:50,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:47:55,960<br \/>\nyou can find this episode&#8217;s show notes<\/p>\n<p>1033<br \/>\n00:47:53,720 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:00,260<br \/>\nand how to subscribe at productivity<\/p>\n<p>1034<br \/>\n00:47:55,960 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:02,600<br \/>\ncastanet forward slash 0 to 9 and if you<\/p>\n<p>1035<br \/>\n00:48:00,260 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:04,520<br \/>\ncould please add a rating or review in<\/p>\n<p>1036<br \/>\n00:48:02,600 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:06,050<br \/>\niTunes to help us grow our personal<\/p>\n<p>1037<br \/>\n00:48:04,520 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:08,480<br \/>\nproductivity community of listeners<\/p>\n<p>1038<br \/>\n00:48:06,050 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:10,220<br \/>\nthank you that brings us to the close of<\/p>\n<p>1039<br \/>\n00:48:08,480 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:12,980<br \/>\nproductivity cast the weekly show about<\/p>\n<p>1040<br \/>\n00:48:10,220 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:14,750<br \/>\nall things productivity here&#8217;s to your<\/p>\n<p>1041<br \/>\n00:48:12,980 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:16,790<br \/>\nproductive life that&#8217;s it for this<\/p>\n<p>1042<br \/>\n00:48:14,750 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:19,430<br \/>\nproductivity cast the weekly show about<\/p>\n<p>1043<br \/>\n00:48:16,790 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:21,500<br \/>\nall things productivity with your hosts<\/p>\n<p>1044<br \/>\n00:48:19,430 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:25,660<br \/>\nray Sydney Smith and Augusto pan out<\/p>\n<p>1045<br \/>\n00:48:21,500 &#8211;&gt; 00:48:25,660<br \/>\nwith Francis Wade and art Galax<\/p>\n<p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As we discussed email in the last episode, email management of multiple accounts has its positives and negatives. All of<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":289,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[128,76,129,3,127],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>029 Inbox Zero, Inbox One, and Processing Email Messages - ProductivityCast - ProductivityCast<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In this cast, we discuss the history of Inbox Zero (with the pros and cons), some related concepts that I\u2019ve theorized over the years (namely my Inbox One and Tab Zero methods, the former of which I hinted at in the last cast), and get feedback and permutations from the ProductivityCast team.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"029 Inbox Zero, Inbox One, and Processing Email Messages - ProductivityCast - ProductivityCast\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In this cast, we discuss the history of Inbox Zero (with the pros and cons), some related concepts that I\u2019ve theorized over the years (namely my Inbox One and Tab Zero methods, the former of which I hinted at in the last cast), and get feedback and permutations from the ProductivityCast team.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"ProductivityCast\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/productivitycast\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-05-10T12:30:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-05-06T14:17:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/05\/029-Inbox-Zero-Inbox-One-and-Processing-Email-Messages-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ray Sidney-Smith\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@rsidneysmith\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@prodcastshow\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ray Sidney-Smith\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"50 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ray Sidney-Smith\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/person\/226872a6bbe4c89226050740b276da08\"},\"headline\":\"029 Inbox Zero, Inbox One, and Processing Email Messages &#8211; ProductivityCast\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-05-10T12:30:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-06T14:17:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/\"},\"wordCount\":10304,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/05\/029-Inbox-Zero-Inbox-One-and-Processing-Email-Messages-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png\",\"keywords\":[\"inbox one\",\"Inbox Zero\",\"processing email messages\",\"productivity\",\"zero inbox\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Casts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/\",\"name\":\"029 Inbox Zero, Inbox One, and Processing Email Messages - ProductivityCast - ProductivityCast\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/05\/029-Inbox-Zero-Inbox-One-and-Processing-Email-Messages-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-05-10T12:30:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-06T14:17:32+00:00\",\"description\":\"In this cast, we discuss the history of Inbox Zero (with the pros and cons), some related concepts that I\u2019ve theorized over the years (namely my Inbox One and Tab Zero methods, the former of which I hinted at in the last cast), and get feedback and permutations from the ProductivityCast team.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/05\/029-Inbox-Zero-Inbox-One-and-Processing-Email-Messages-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/05\/029-Inbox-Zero-Inbox-One-and-Processing-Email-Messages-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png\",\"width\":1400,\"height\":1400,\"caption\":\"029 - Inbox Zero, Inbox One, and Processing Email Messages - ProductivityCast\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"029 Inbox Zero, Inbox One, and Processing Email Messages &#8211; ProductivityCast\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/\",\"name\":\"ProductivityCast\",\"description\":\"The weekly show about all things productivity\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#organization\",\"name\":\"ProductivityCast\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2022\/03\/ProductivityCast-Logo-with-tagline.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2022\/03\/ProductivityCast-Logo-with-tagline.png\",\"width\":2800,\"height\":2800,\"caption\":\"ProductivityCast\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/productivitycast\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/prodcastshow\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/person\/226872a6bbe4c89226050740b276da08\",\"name\":\"Ray Sidney-Smith\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e78862bcd2eacbab8c97b6703db853f6?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e78862bcd2eacbab8c97b6703db853f6?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ray Sidney-Smith\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/rsidneysmith.com\",\"https:\/\/instagram.com\/focusatworkco\",\"https:\/\/linkedin.com\/in\/raymond\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/rsidneysmith\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"029 Inbox Zero, Inbox One, and Processing Email Messages - ProductivityCast - ProductivityCast","description":"In this cast, we discuss the history of Inbox Zero (with the pros and cons), some related concepts that I\u2019ve theorized over the years (namely my Inbox One and Tab Zero methods, the former of which I hinted at in the last cast), and get feedback and permutations from the ProductivityCast team.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"029 Inbox Zero, Inbox One, and Processing Email Messages - ProductivityCast - ProductivityCast","og_description":"In this cast, we discuss the history of Inbox Zero (with the pros and cons), some related concepts that I\u2019ve theorized over the years (namely my Inbox One and Tab Zero methods, the former of which I hinted at in the last cast), and get feedback and permutations from the ProductivityCast team.","og_url":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/","og_site_name":"ProductivityCast","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/productivitycast","article_published_time":"2018-05-10T12:30:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-05-06T14:17:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1400,"height":1400,"url":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/05\/029-Inbox-Zero-Inbox-One-and-Processing-Email-Messages-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Ray Sidney-Smith","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@rsidneysmith","twitter_site":"@prodcastshow","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ray Sidney-Smith","Est. reading time":"50 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/"},"author":{"name":"Ray Sidney-Smith","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/person\/226872a6bbe4c89226050740b276da08"},"headline":"029 Inbox Zero, Inbox One, and Processing Email Messages &#8211; ProductivityCast","datePublished":"2018-05-10T12:30:14+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-06T14:17:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/"},"wordCount":10304,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/05\/029-Inbox-Zero-Inbox-One-and-Processing-Email-Messages-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png","keywords":["inbox one","Inbox Zero","processing email messages","productivity","zero inbox"],"articleSection":["Casts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/","url":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/","name":"029 Inbox Zero, Inbox One, and Processing Email Messages - ProductivityCast - ProductivityCast","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/05\/029-Inbox-Zero-Inbox-One-and-Processing-Email-Messages-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png","datePublished":"2018-05-10T12:30:14+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-06T14:17:32+00:00","description":"In this cast, we discuss the history of Inbox Zero (with the pros and cons), some related concepts that I\u2019ve theorized over the years (namely my Inbox One and Tab Zero methods, the former of which I hinted at in the last cast), and get feedback and permutations from the ProductivityCast team.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/05\/029-Inbox-Zero-Inbox-One-and-Processing-Email-Messages-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/05\/029-Inbox-Zero-Inbox-One-and-Processing-Email-Messages-ProductivityCast-sq-min.png","width":1400,"height":1400,"caption":"029 - Inbox Zero, Inbox One, and Processing Email Messages - ProductivityCast"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/029-inbox-zero-inbox-one-and-processing-email-messages-productivitycast\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"029 Inbox Zero, Inbox One, and Processing Email Messages &#8211; ProductivityCast"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#website","url":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/","name":"ProductivityCast","description":"The weekly show about all things productivity","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#organization","name":"ProductivityCast","url":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2022\/03\/ProductivityCast-Logo-with-tagline.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2022\/03\/ProductivityCast-Logo-with-tagline.png","width":2800,"height":2800,"caption":"ProductivityCast"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/productivitycast","https:\/\/x.com\/prodcastshow"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/person\/226872a6bbe4c89226050740b276da08","name":"Ray Sidney-Smith","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e78862bcd2eacbab8c97b6703db853f6?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e78862bcd2eacbab8c97b6703db853f6?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ray Sidney-Smith"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/rsidneysmith.com","https:\/\/instagram.com\/focusatworkco","https:\/\/linkedin.com\/in\/raymond","https:\/\/x.com\/rsidneysmith"],"url":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/288"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=288"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/288\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/289"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=288"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=288"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/productivitycast.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=288"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}